LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

March 28, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Have you ever heard of the rule of three? I learned it in the military. The rule is that you can survive three minutes without oxygen, three days without water, and three weeks without food. After that, you die.

I had a ‘Rule of the Six’ for a few months between marriages. It was the only time in my life I ever dated multiple women. I found that I could date six women and see all of them at least once every two weeks, rotating around so I would see a couple of them in consecutive weeks, and one of them twice in a single week. If I tried to add a seventh woman to the mix, the whole thing would fall apart, and as a consequence, if I wanted to add someone new, I had to let someone else go.

On a side note, the day after I met my wife, I called all six of the girls I had been seeing and told them I could not see them anymore. 

My wife likes chairs. I don’t know how many chairs we have, but my wife is always looking for fancy, antique chairs. We eventually made a rule that for every chair that enters the house, one has to leave (otherwise, we would have no room to walk). I guess it is the ‘Rule of Not Adding More Chairs.’

A disciplined life will not only have rules, but will follow them, and in the spirit of such things, allow me to introduce you to Anthony Fauci’s rules. I call these, collectively, The Rule of Two.

And note that I no longer refer to Anthony Fauci as ‘doctor.’ I do not deny that he is a doctor, but when he is acting out of political ideology rather than medical science – he is not acting as a doctor, and we should stop referring to him as one.

The Rule of Two:

Two weeks to flatten the curve.

Two months to flatten the economy.

Two masks to flatten the truth.

Two years to flatten your expectations.

Two injections to flatten your freedoms.

Two boosters to flatten your hope.

Two mutations to flatten your future.

Two elections to flatten our Republic.

I’ll add to The Rule of Two the following two questions:

1  Have you had enough yet?
2  How much longer will you comply?

These two questions will become increasingly important as our Federal Government extends the pandemic – admitting that cloth masks were nothing but political theatre while starting to mandate medical-grade masks to enter society under the threat of spreading a virus that is less dangerous than the flu.

We are not in a pandemic anymore, but Fauci told us just the other day – and repeated the following day – that though Omicron may be mild, that does NOT mean we can relax restrictions, so like the Little Engine that Could (Not), we just keep chugging up the mountain, knowing we will never reach the top. 

The Biden Administration, in the meantime, tells us to grow up and manage our expectations – Build Back Better means empty shelves are the new normal, and the good days are never coming back.

The Biden Administration has a strange definition for the word ‘Better.’  

The Democrats are forwarding two methodologies to cheat in the next election. The first is with two Federal election laws that would radically transform how we run elections in ways that would give us – that are designed to give us – a pandemic of voter fraud. The second is that they are extending the pandemic so that they can ignore state election laws again and cheat again, should those two laws fail to pass or get shut down by the court.

The Democrats accuse the Republicans of vote suppression, and there are, in fact, two groups that Republicans really do try to suppress. These groups, incidentally, are the two most loyal voting demographics the democrats have.

The first group is the dead voter. Dead voters have been voting Democrat for as long as there have been Democrats, and the votes of dead voters have always been an important part of the Democrat base. John F. Kennedy would never have been President hadn’t large numbers of dead people voted in Chicago.

A newer demographic has become even more important to Democrats than dead voters, and that would be the non-voting voter. It is the non-voting vote that vote harvesting is designed to capture.

The Democrats are absolutely adamant that the voices of dead voters and non-voting voters will be heard. Democrats are equally adamant that they – and no one else – knows how dead people and non-voting people would vote, if dead people could vote, and if non-voters did vote, so by casting votes for these people, Democrats claim to be strengthening our democracy.

There is, of course, a distinct difference between ‘count every vote,’ and ‘count every voter.’ ‘Count every vote’ includes counting the fraudulent ones cast by dead people and non-voters, which is exactly why the Democrats focus on counting every vote, and not every voter. The truth is that fraudulent votes disenfranchise everyone by taking the choice of who will lead the country away from the people. If you have ever wondered why it is that Democrats don’t seem to care how popular their ideas are, it’s because they don’t think the public should have any choice in the matter and are happy to use whatever means they must to gain and hold power. They do not care what you think.

By mailing out ballots to every household, Democrats can then go door to door collecting ballots from people who do not want to use them. Democrats just assume these people would vote Democrat if they voted, and so Democrats fill out their ballots as a straight-line Democrat vote.

Democrats don’t need to collect the ballots from people who do not intend to vote, either. They know what the ballot number is – they can just create another ballot with the same number, and to save on postage, the Democrats even have drop-boxes where mail-in ballots can be dropped off in bulk.

It used to be that someone had to request an absentee ballot to get one, and it used to be that only the person who received an absentee ballot or an immediate family member (such as a spouse) could turn it in. This was specifically to safeguard against vote fraud through harvesting. In 2016, vote harvesting was legal in California, and even Orange County – a Republican stronghold – voted Democrat. In 2020, thanks to Covid, vote harvesting was used throughout the country – in spite of being illegal.

Do you remember Stacey Abrams in Georgia? She lost the 2018 Georgia Gubernatorial Election and then refused to concede defeat. Vote harvesting was illegal in Georgia at the time, but Democrats used it anyway. Without the harvested votes, Brian Kemp (Republican) won, but with the harvested votes, Stacey Abrams would have won. The Democrats accused Brian Kemp and the Republican Party of suppressing votes by throwing the illegally harvested votes out, but it was truly the Democrats who were trying to commit fraud. The Democrats were hoping that they could use the court system to make vote harvesting legal throughout the country. The courts did not side with them – the Democrats failed.

In 2020, Democrat Governors and Secretaries of State unilaterally imposed illegal election changes – changes that broke both state and federal law – and if the pandemic extends into the next election, they will do it again. Vote Harvesting will once again be a nationwide phenomenon, and the American People will have no reason to trust the election results.

You can break politicians up into two general groups: those who want you to be free, and those who do not. Those who have been pushing mandates do not want you free, and if we do not get them out of office, we may quickly find ourselves going from a nation with two effective choices (Democrat or Republican) to a nation with no choices.

Freedom is on the line.

I’ve said a number of times that we need to be revolutionaries in the primaries and party loyalists in the general. Governors and Secretaries of State are critical for maintaining and strengthening the integrity of our elections, but also in standing up to federal overreach.

Ryan Kelley is running in Michigan, and election integrity is an important part of his platform. On day one, Ryan Kelley will declare the pandemic over and ban electronic voting. He will strengthen the Second Amendment through Constitutional Carry. He will ban CRT in our public schools and eliminate unemployment insurance for those who refuse to work. Ryan Kelley is also the first politician to endorse my Common Sense pamphlet, and since Ryan Kelley is on the side of the American People, and our Republic, I am on the side of Ryan Kelley.

I am proud to endorse Ryan Kelley in the Michigan Governor race.

Image: Reuters

  • Wallace Garneau

    Wallace L. Garneau, political commentator and professional author, brings a unique blend of expertise to the airwaves. Raised in a family of historians, Garneau's roots in history and economics run deep, with a particular focus on Europe between the World Wars. With a background in information technology and a keen business mind, Garneau authored "The Way Forward: Lean Leadership and Systems Thinking for Large and Small Businesses." His knack for breaking down complex ideas in clear, accessible language makes him a standout author and a powerful voice in the radio and podcast sphere. Beyond the corporate world, Garneau's culinary passion shines through in his social media presence, where he shares grilling and smoking techniques. A two-service military veteran (Marine Corps and Army), family man, and father of two, Garneau embodies dedication both personally and professionally. Listeners can expect insightful commentary on politics, economics, and culture. His unique perspective, rooted in historical understanding, sets him apart. Join Wallace Garneau on the America Out Loud network—his is a voice that not only informs but resonates, helping make sense of today's complex world through a lens of experience, knowledge, and a touch of culinary flair.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack Bergeron
Jack Bergeron
2 years ago

And then there are voting machines that have been used to count the ballots with weighted vote count for the favored candidate and a diminished vote for the un-favored candidate and outside connection to the internet. But god forbid we should mention or challenge this.

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link