After Dark with Rob & Andrew, ‘Don’t Believe The Liberal Media Spin on Inflation’ at 9 PM ET on the iHeart Radio Network.   More on the Omicron Variant and the 10th COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough today at 10 PM ET on The Voice of a Nation.   Our free APPS on Apple, Android, or Alexa give you 24/7 access to the best talk radio in America.

November 29, 2021

November 29, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Are There Exceptions to the Constitution?

by | Apr 26, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A case recently argued before the Supreme Court asked whether the community caretaker exception” allows police officers to enter a home without a warrant to seize property. Let’s examine how constitutional law, which is nothing more than the opinion of judges, is being used to circumvent the Constitution of the United States.

Oral arguments were given before the Supreme Court in the case Caniglia v. Strom. The petitioner, Edward A. Caniglia, has sued Robert F. Strom and several other officials of the city of Cranston, RI, after police officers entered his home without a warrant and confiscated Mr. Stroms property, specifically two handguns, then refused to return them. Specifically, Mr. Strom claimed that the city of Cranston had violated his rights protected by the Second and Fourth Amendments and that the city violated the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. From the complaint:

At issue here is Petitioners claim that the entry into his home and resulting seizures—effected without a warrant or civil order—violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The officersonly justification for the entry and seizures was the community caretaking” exception.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

The argument made by Mr. Stroms attorney was quite simple:

The Fourth Amendment recognizes the sanctity of the home by drawing a firm line at the door. The government cannot cross that line without a warrant unless there is consent or exigent circumstances. Here, there was neither. Respondentswarrantless seizure of Petitioner from his home and their subsequent seizures of his lawfully possessed guns from his bedroom and garage violated the Fourth Amendment.

Caniglia v. Strom Oral Arguments

As one would expect, the attorney for the city of Cranston argued differently:

The question presented is whether caretaking by police officers and first responders may, under certain circumstances, take place in the home without a warrant. It should. The Petitioner has an absolute position: Under no circumstances should a warrantless caretaking occur inside a home, except upon consent or exigent circumstances. This absolute all-or-nothing approach is contrary to the reasonableness standard of the Fourth Amendment, the very touchstone of the Fourth Amendment. There may be circumstances that allow for caretaking in the home absent a warrant when the advent of the potential harm is not so clear, but the need to respond could be immediate. Time could be of the essence.

Caniglia v. Strom Oral Arguments

So which argument is correct?

Community Caretaking

If I understand the arguments made correctly, the community caretaking exception” was something the courts came up with based on hypothetical arguments made in cases like Cady v Dombrowski, which involved a search of a vehicle in police custody. There is just one problem. There is no exception to the Constitution, period. In order for a search to be legal, it must be reasonable. While the definition of reasonable is not as specific as we would like, that is the standard.

Having the faculty of reason, endued with reason, as a reasonable being.

Reasonable – Websters 1828 Dictionary

A faculty of the mind by which it distinguishes truth from falsehood, and good from evil, and which enables the possessor to deduce inferences from facts or from propositions.

Reason – Websters 1828 Dictionary

When the term reasonable” is used in the Constitution, it is most often referred to as what a reasonable person would find reasonable. I know, circular logic, but that tends to be the standard most often used. The idea of the community caretaker exception” seems to be distinguishing between the investigative functions of law enforcement and its merely caretaker functions. However, this brings to light another fallacy about the Constitution.

The limitations the Constitution places are upon government, not simply law enforcement. It is just as illegal for a public school official, a census taker, or a city dog catcher to search or seize you or your property as it is for law enforcement to do so. For any government official to search you or your property, it must be reasonable. That generally means that either there must be an imminent threat to someone or that the official has gone to court to get a legitimate warrant. Should a government official with legitimate concern for the welfare of someone enter a home, they should not be allowed to search t; that would be unreasonable. Weve all seen the crime drama where the law enforcement officer, knowing” that there is evidence in someones home, pretends to hear a call for help, then uses that as justification for entering and searching. I know of no reasonable person that would consider that a reasonable search. In the same vein, should law enforcement be dispatched to someones home for a wellness check,” they are there to check on a person’s health and should not be allowed to use that as an excuse to search or seize items, even if they are in plain view.

WATCH THE VIDEO ON RUMBLE

Was the Seizure Reasonable?

Before we go on, let us look at the question of reasonableness in this case. After a heated argument between Mr. Caniglia and his wife, Mrs. Caniglia spent the night at a motel. The next day, concerned about her husband, Mrs. Caniglia contacted Cranston police and asked them to escort her home and do a wellness check on her husband.

When multiple officers arrived to meet her, Mrs. Caniglia told them what had happened and that she was concerned about her husbands safety—including the possibility that he could be suicidal.

After calling Petitioner, who sounded fine,” the officers escorted Mrs. Caniglia back to the home, where they instructed her to stay in the car while they spoke with Petitioner on the back deck. Petitioner told the officers about what had happened and that he had said just shoot me” because he couldnt take it anymore.” “He was calm for the most part,” “seemed normal,” and said, that he would never commit suicide.” Mrs. Caniglia then entered the home.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

Say what you will about the wisdom of Mr. Caniglias words, uttered in the heat of the moment when interviewed outside his home; the officers found him calm and normal but were not convinced.

Based on their conversations with Petitioner and Mrs. Caniglia, the officers believed there was a risk that Petitioner would harm himself. As a result, they summoned a rescue lieutenant from the Cranston Fire Department to the Canigliashome. That officer told Petitioner that he was taking him to a local hospital. Petitioner went along after the police told him they would not take his two handguns if he did so. At the hospital, a nurse and a social worker examined Petitioner. He was discharged the very same day but had to pay about $1000 for the visit.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

The police officers convinced Mr. Strom to go to the hospital for an examination, a trip which cost him $1,000. Mr. Strom would only go after the police told him they would not take his firearms, but that was not the case:

Meanwhile, the officers entered the Canigliashome to seize Petitioners guns. The officers believed it was reasonable to do so based on [Petitioners] state of mind” and feared that [Petitioner] and others could be in danger” if guns remained in the home. After the officers falsely represented to Mrs. Caniglia that Petitioner had consented, she led the officers to the guns. The officers then seized them.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

And law enforcement wonders why people dont trust them? First, they lied to Mr. Caniglia about them confiscating his property. Then they lied to his wife about Mr. Caniglias consent. If the officers thought they had probable cause to seize the weapons, why did they not get a warrant? Police noted that Mr. Caniglia seemed normal and, for the most part, calm. Yet they thought it reasonable to not only confiscate this mans property without any probable cause? If the police officers thought it was reasonable, why did they wait until after Mr. Caniglia had left the premises? And why did they lie to him about their intentions? Yes, the wife stated that she was concerned, but if she thought it was reasonable for the officers to confiscate her husbands firearms, why did they have to lie to her about his consent? To add insult to injury, this saga was not finished.

A few days later, Mrs. Caniglia went to the police station to retrieve the guns. Officers refused her request. A month later, Petitioner went to the police station with the same request. Again, the officers refused. When Petitioners attorney made the same request, he fared no better.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

So we have an illegal seizure of private property, deprivation of rights under color of law, and law enforcement was allowed to lie during the commission of a crime while acting under their oath of office. Yet, it does not seem they have been charged. Instead, we have innocent citizens having to fight for the return of their illegally seized property, property that was not returned until after Mr. Caniglia sued the city.

We should not be surprised when those in government attempt to find exceptions to the Constitution, especially when it restricts their actions. And Im not surprised when government actors, in the form of judges, either invent these exceptions or use those created by their predecessors.

There is no exception to the Fourth Amendments protections, or for that matter, any other constitutional rules. A search or seizure is either reasonable or not. If government actors could not, or do not, get a warrant, they need a really good reason to search and seize. It is not reasonable to use the excuse of checking on someones well-being to circumvent the supreme law of the land. It is also unreasonable and should be illegal for government actors to lie to those they are supposed to serve. If we allow members of courts to continue to violate their oaths to support the Constitution, then we are just as much to blame as they are. I do know that those in the district court who found it reasonable for law enforcement to seize property without probable cause and lied to make that happen should be investigated for judicial misconduct.

If the people of this country cannot trust their courts to abide by the law they swore or affirmed to uphold, then we must demand our representatives in the House do their job and oversee the courts.

If we cannot trust those we hire to represent us to do their jobs, then its about time we found better people to represent us.

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

The ‘Brain Trust’ Behind Joe Biden

The ‘Brain Trust’ Behind Joe Biden

Former acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has described Susan Rice as the real Oval Office leader and “shadow president.” Ron Klain also played a key role in coordinating the Obama administration’s response to the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak. Steve Ricchetti has been a long-time lobbyist for major drugmakers, the American Hospital Association…

The End of Human Rights and the Beginning of Tyranny

The End of Human Rights and the Beginning of Tyranny

America used to be a nation of ideals and values, with laws that represented those ideals and values. While there was disagreement over what the laws should be, there was a wide degree of agreement with regard to our ideals and values. We no longer have any shared values or ideals. Much of the left views our national founding and our traditional ideals, not just as passe, but as vile and evil…

Does Freedom of Speech Include the Freedom to Swear?

Does Freedom of Speech Include the Freedom to Swear?

Public schools don’t have an interest in protecting student speech; they have a duty. Schools are institutions of instruction, not “nurseries of democracy.” Perhaps, if the schools these justices went to had spent more time instructing them and less time considering what was in the school’s interest, these men and women would realize not only that America is not a democracy, but that our Founding Fathers feared that it would become one…

Political Correctness and Science Don’t Mix

Political Correctness and Science Don’t Mix

We now see Political Correctness in the arbitrary flip-flopping of the CDC’s positions: masks aren’t effective, no – wear masks; get vaccinated, wait- vaccinations aren’t effective; those vaccinated don’t have to wear a mask, no -wait -those vaccinated do have to wear masks. These are political edicts, not scientific edicts. The CDC’s own data contradicts their mandates…

China’s Comprehensive Unrestricted Bioweapons Program Exposed

China’s Comprehensive Unrestricted Bioweapons Program Exposed

In sharing some of her findings with Dr. Poon, Dr. Yan was warned not to ‘cross the red line,’ a common reference in Chinese culture to getting into the subject matter with which one should not concern oneself. He ultimately warned her that she would be ‘disappeared,’ a reference to being imprisoned or killed, were she to continue asserting her findings of the cover-up…

Let’s Gratefully Appropriate Each Other’s American Cultures

Let’s Gratefully Appropriate Each Other’s American Cultures

We are currently witnessing a surge of neo-Marxist tribal ideologies weaponizing historical-cultural, ethnic, racial, and gender groups against one another — with anti-American divide and conquer, controlling agendas straight out of Mao’s multiple warfront playbook. According to CRT activists, falling into evils of cultural appropriation is much more than a slippery slope. It constitutes a veritable landslide, including the music we listen to, the clothes we wear, and the food we eat…

Americans Push Back Against the Cuomo Elite

Americans Push Back Against the Cuomo Elite

The elite Cuomo brothers use their vices of political and media platforms to propagate the alleged deadly vaccine agenda, while big brother Andrew Cuomo lords over New Yorkers through a worn-out government oligarchy system; little brother Chris Cuomo weaponizes and exacerbates the voices of freedom-loving Americans…

Hyperinflation of Death Certificates: Did the CDC Defraud The American People?

Hyperinflation of Death Certificates: Did the CDC Defraud The American People?

What we need is an independent full medical audit of each death certificate to correct the count now that the CDC has confirmed for at least the 3rd time that over 94% of all death certificates had on average 4.0 comorbidities. Did you know that only for COVID death certificates are comorbidities completely de-emphasized and moved to Part 2 rather than Part 1 so that COVID can be listed as THE CAUSE OF DEATH? 

The Brainwashing Has Begun in Our Military and Schools

The Brainwashing Has Begun in Our Military and Schools

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck. Teaching a child that he is bad because his skin is white is Critical Race Theory by any name. The Constitution and Bill of Rights list freedom of religion as a basic right of all Americans, including those in the military. No more. Today’s military wants only “woke” soldiers…

Header

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap