Battle Over Supreme Court Seat will be Bloody and Consequential

by | Sep 20, 2020 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Few will dispute that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who passed away last Friday at age 87 following years of valiant struggles with cancer was a truly remarkable woman, legal jurist, and iconic champion of gender rights.
It is also a fact that Justice Ginsburg’s health concerns had unsuccessfully prompted the Obama administration to urge her to retire so that a replacement could be seated with certainty while Democrats controlled the White House and Senate.
The partisan battle over that seat, now open at a time of enormous partisan national pre-election turmoil, promises to be epically confrontational and historically impactful. And whereas the outcome is presently unknowable by anyone, key strategic battle issues, options and tradeoffs on both sides are highly predictable.
Just hours after Justice Ginsburg’s death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, promised to put a Trump nominee up for a vote before November. That position was soon reiterated by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-TX, who said it was “critical” that the Senate confirm a replacement for Ginsburg before the election because it was “why Donald Trump was elected.”
Cruz emphasized that it was particularly important that the Ginsburg vacancy be filled before the election to avoid a potential split decision impasse over resolving a contested election result. Speaking on Fox News, Cruz warned that a divided 4-4 Supreme Court “cannot decide anything,” and under that scenario, “I think we risk a constitutional crisis.”
Such a decisive standoff dilemma is hardly a remote prospect. On August 26, anticipating a delayed presidential election outcome, Hillary Clinton said, “Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances, because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is.”
Clinton’s statement during an interview with her former communications director Jennifer Palmieri for Showtime’s “The Circus,” comes at a time of contentious Republican versus Democrat legal battles over unsolicited mass mail-in voting.

Conservatives typically view the liberal COVID-lockdown-argument primarily as a ruse to counter their far more energized in-person voting turnout, enable widespread tabulation fraud and ballot harvesting, and intentionally and interminably delay winner results in the event Trump is reelected.

Conspicuously active lawyering up of Democrat litigants offers strong evidence that such concerns are warranted.
Seating constitutionally originalist Supreme Court vacancy replacements is a top conservative voting priority among those who have witnessed a growing trend of progressive judicial activist rulings regarding many issues they care most about. Key among these are right to life, immigration, second amendment protections, preserving the Electoral College, and now most immediately urgent, securing election integrity.
President Trump has made it clear that he intends to move quickly to nominate a Ginsburg replacement. Among the candidates, Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett is among those believed to be a frontrunner.
On Saturday, Trump tweeted,

“We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us, the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court justices.”

In another tweet, Trump thanked former Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, for in 2013, abolishing the requirement for presidential appointees to receive 60 votes for confirmation. In 2017, Senate Majority Leader McConnell extended the policy to Supreme Court nominees.
Unsurprisingly, with the election about a month and a half away, the plan to move forward on a pre-election Ginsburg seat replacement vote has triggered immediate and vociferous Democrat backlash.
Presidential candidate Biden told reporters on Friday, “Just so there is no doubt, let me be clear: The voters should pick a president and that president should pick the justices for the Senate to consider.”
Former President Obama said in a late Friday statement: “Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in.”
Referring to the Senate’s refusal to confirm his proposed replacement for the late Justice Antonin Scalia who died in February 2016, Obama added, “A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment.”
Obama continued, “The rule of law, the legitimacy of our courts, the fundamental workings of our democracy all depend on that basic principle.”
Subsequently and unexpectedly, Donald Trump was elected and nominated Neil Gorsuch who was then confirmed.
Sen. McConnell drew a distinction between the current scenario and the Merrick Garland precedent in 2016 when the Senate was controlled by Republicans and a Democrat president nominated in an election year. Now, both the Senate and the presidency, are controlled by Republicans.
Here’s a non-trick question. What would you suppose a Biden administration and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer would choose to do if the tables were turned?
Schumer told congressional Democrats on a Saturday conference call that “nothing is off the table next year” if McConnell and his Republican allies move to fill Justice Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat in the coming weeks.
As for what he is referring to as being already “on the table,” Schumer’s comments come amid calls from fellow Democrats, including Sens. Jerry Nadler and Ed Markey, to abolish the filibuster and expand the number of Supreme Court judges to counteract the appointment if they regain control of the presidency and Senate. Although that number has been locked at nine members since 1869, the U.S. Constitution doesn’t prevent changing that.
It’s also no secret that the Democrats will push statehood status for the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico to add progressive Electoral College advantages.

All of this contentious back-and forth comes with calculated but indeterminate risks on both sides, setting the stage for an incendiary war both before and in the aftermath of the November elections.

There are no current assurances either that the GOP Senate has a necessary simple majority to pass a pre-election confirmation vote, or even then, whether they can manage to pull it off before November 3. If necessary, however, Vice President Pence, as Constitutionally authorized ex efficio president of the Senate, could act as a voting tie-breaker.
Then again, if postponed by intent or delay until after the election, the unresolved issue can be expected to disproportionately amp up Republican voter turnout and balloting advantages. And even with either or both White House and Senate losses, the Republican senators still have until January 3 to confirm the Supreme Court nominee.
Democrats, on the other hand, might have good reasons to worry that vicious attacks on the nominee of the ugly sort witnessed in Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings will turn off and turn away many moderate voters. Assaults on a female nominee will be regarded as especially disgusting.
Delayed and contested election results through mail-in ballot vetting and tabulation litigation present high likelihood of inciting more episodes of street violence, looting and property destruction that have come to plague many Democrat-run cities. This would be a very misguided strategy to gain future public confidence in progressive party policies and leadership.
So yes, the outcome, the battle over Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s replacement seat will be enormously bloody and consequential to the future of our American republic. The outcome will significantly and eternally influence elections of presidents, legislatures, and fundamental Constitutional interpretations.
This is a dangerous, inevitable and incalculably unpredictable war. And it is well worth fighting.

Avatar

Larry Bell is an endowed professor of space architecture at the University of Houston. He founded the Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) and the space architecture graduate program. He is the author of several books, including "Reinventing Ourselves: How Technology is Rapidly and Radically Transforming Humanity" (2019), "Thinking Whole: Rejecting Half-Witted Left & Right Brain Limitations" (2018), "Reflections on Oceans and Puddles: One Hundred Reasons to be Enthusiastic, Grateful and Hopeful” (2017), "Cosmic Musings: Contemplating Life Beyond Self" (2016), and "Scared Witless: Prophets and Profits of Climate Doom" (2015). He is currently working on a new book with Buzz Aldrin, "Beyond Footprints and Flagpoles."

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and save 15%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Take a Look at the Positive Side of Anarchy

Take a Look at the Positive Side of Anarchy

The only way to achieve liberty and peace is to restore law and order. And the only way to restore law and order is to literally crush the forces of evil. When that begins to happen, we do actually see the positive side of tyranny and anarchy. Conflict is a bedfellow of oppression. Therefore we must end the conflict and, in doing so, end the tyranny. Here’s the positive side of this war…

It’s a LONG-HAUL with COVID-19

It’s a LONG-HAUL with COVID-19

The context is that about 50% of those hospitalized with COVID-19 develop post-COVID symptoms. Severe outpatients also are affected. Characteristic symptoms include headache, hearing loss, tinnitus, loss of olfactory function, sleep disturbance, muscle aches, weakness, fatigue, and chest or abdominal pain…

Be the One.

Be the One.

Be the one — no longer willing to huddle together in the helpless band — the one who dares to join the fight. Another will follow you and then another, and in a flash of time, that bleeding hulk of our nation — once the great light of liberty to the world, now barely flickering — will rise again to throw off the wolves like it has done before, sending them scurrying for safety…

Major Medical Mystery: Why Some People Despite Exposure Don’t Get COVID

Major Medical Mystery: Why Some People Despite Exposure Don’t Get COVID

A small fraction of Americans have escaped COVID infection. CDC uses a figure of 60% for those infected, while the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington says that 76% have been infected. The remainder may have escaped exposure or been exposed but escaped infection. The latter people are the subject of the medical mystery…

Correcting America’s Course Back to the Constitutional Rule of Law

Correcting America’s Course Back to the Constitutional Rule of Law

The US Constitution must scrupulously be followed, especially by the judiciary. It is not for judges to make laws; it is for them to observe and rule on the constitutionality of issues before them. Their oaths, taken upon their confirmations, should include the understanding that their failures to follow judicial protocols would end in their termination…

Does Joe Biden Aspire to be America’s Last President?

Does Joe Biden Aspire to be America’s Last President?

Most ominously, no American administration has ever seemed so entirely unconcerned about hemorrhaging political capital. And that lack of concern about voters’ approval can only mean that this administration no longer believes it relies on political capital (the consent of the governed) for power. We can only assume that this Marxist-aligned administration intends to authorize itself with whatever power it requires to achieve its ends…

Criminal Intimidation Led By Schumer and Pelosi are America’s Domestic Terrorists

Criminal Intimidation Led By Schumer and Pelosi are America’s Domestic Terrorists

The SCOTUS leak was explicitly designed to tip the balance back to Progressivisms demands and rally the Democrat base to intimidate conservatives, political and business leaders by threats of violence because the country is in a Biden mess, one he created in January 2021 to reflect his party’s image as one that clings to the failed philosophy of Marx and Engles…

Pennsylvania Races Plunge to Swampy Politics 

Pennsylvania Races Plunge to Swampy Politics 

The establishment has money and counts itself as power brokers. They love the status quo, the “don’t rock the boat” mentality. They pronounce, “This is our guy!” and expect the masses to get in line. However, many are standing up and deciding to vote conscience over party or affiliation – regardless. But aren’t those the same “stand up” attitude and actions that formed this great nation?

America Out Loud 6 years

Celebrating 6 incredible years fighting to restore liberty and justice to our beloved America.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP
Healthycell

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link