Now comes another International Classification of Disease (ICD) billing code (Z28.310), complements of the World Health Organization, intended to inform the government and your insurer of your Covid vaccine status. The code will be required, no doubt, to receive full...
Bill Gates: Philanthropist or Maniacal Frankenstein?
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is widely credited with being one of the most generous philanthropic organizations of our time. Its global immunization programs are said to have saved millions of lives in the poorest of countries. Even if true, what risks are being taken at the expense of the very people the programs are designed to help? Given Bill Gates’ personal push to vaccinate every person on earth for the CCP virus, it’s a question worth asking.
According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense and nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy, Bill Gates is an “ego-driven maniacal Frankenstein.” “Vaccines, for Bill Gates,” he claims, “are a strategic philanthropy that feeds his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and gives him dictatorial control of global health policy.” That’s quite a charge. Could it be true?
Kennedy states that “Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.”
The official government report cited by Kennedy called the “Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India,” dated July 6, 2018, is found on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) own website. It concludes that “repeated doses of the live vaccine virus … may induce paralysis.”
The report gives a very reasonable explanation for the “beyond expected rates” of paralyzed children. It claims that the “increase in NPAFP was noticed only because of excellent surveillance methods, the meticulous recording of data, accurate pooling of the figures nationally and making it available in the public domain—the 491,000 additional cases of paralysis would not have been noticed otherwise.” In other words, record-keeping had improved. Are you buying that?
The Independent Monitoring Board, a neutral body, oversees the global effort to eradicate polio. Their 2019 “Global Polio Eradication Initiative” report delivered a scathing summation of the current worldwide status. Page 4 states that eradication efforts are now in “crisis” mode. One of the members who oversaw that report was the highly-respected Dr. Thomas Frieden, former Director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
According to the report, the polio vaccine program continues today in areas like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Africa with what overseers call “mopping up.” The term refers to administering additional live inoculations to control the widespread polio outbreaks caused by the vaccines themselves. The victims are almost all under five years of age.
There is a “widespread occurrence of vaccine-derived polioviruses … spreading uncontrolled in West Africa, bursting geographical boundaries and raising fundamental questions and challenges for the whole eradication process.”
In some districts in certain countries, per the report, polio cases have doubled since the vaccine eradication program began causing untold cases of paralysis and deaths. Yet, there remains intense international pressure and even reported bullying to force countries into compliance.
Science published an article on July 10, 2019, entitled “Surging cases have dashed all hope that polio might be eradicated in 2019”. It leaves little doubt about the devastation oral vaccines have caused since the Gates Foundation pushed them on countries that had nearly eradicated wild, naturally-occurring poliovirus.
Because of that aggressive program, according to WHO’s Michel Zaffran, who heads the global initiative, “‘an increasing number of children lack immunity to the type 2 [wild] virus, setting the stage for an explosive outbreak.’ That puts the program in a bind. ‘We have no choice but to keep using’ the monovalent vaccine. It is all we’ve got. We have to live with the risk until we have a technical solution.’”
Sadly, polio vaccines aren’t the only inoculation experiments attributed to Bill Gates.
In 2017 a paper was published in the Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law entitled, “Accountability of International NGOs: Human Rights Violations in Healthcare Provision in Developing Countries and the Effectiveness of Current Measures.” The author states that “in 2010, the Gates Foundation-funded experimental malaria and meningitis vaccine trials across Africa and HPV vaccine programs in India. These programs resulted in numerous deaths and injuries, with accounts of forced vaccinations and uninformed consent. Ultimately, these health campaigns, under the guise of saving lives, have relocated large-scale clinical trials of untested or unapproved drugs to developing markets where administering drugs is less regulated and cheaper.” (pg. 2) In other words, the poor are being used as guinea pigs.
As long ago as 1995, according to PubMed.org, the UN and affiliates were suspected of administering tetanus vaccines to women in developing countries that contained an antifertility drug without their knowledge. Kennedy claims that the practice was never stopped.
A press release from 2010 on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s website announced “[l]ate-stage trials” were underway “on a promising vaccine to protect children from malaria, and a new vaccine to prevent meningitis outbreaks in Africa.”
Results of the meningitis vaccine program in 2012 are disturbing. Fifty of the 500 children were left permanently paralyzed or disabled. That’s ten percent. The lack of accountability and compassion from the Gates Foundation and the W.H.O., as reported by many devastated family members, provides care for victims afterward with this and so many other vaccine trials are shocking.
In 2014, according to Kennedy, “Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign…. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing [and administering] the sterility vaccines for over a decade.”
Given that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second-largest donor to the W.H.O., providing 9.8% of its funds, we have an obligation to question their motives.
With the numerous credible reports of gross vaccine program mismanagement in other countries, Bill Gates’ recent advice for handling the CCP virus here at home should be taken with a hefty dose of skepticism.
In an opinion piece written for the Washington Post on March 31, 2020, Gates suggests that to “bring the disease to an end, we’ll need a safe and effective vaccine…. But creating a vaccine is only half the battle. To protect Americans and people around the world, we’ll need to manufacture billions of doses.” It seems to me, the last thing Bill Gates ought to be encouraging is another rushed vaccine.
The greatest negative outcome from the pandemic, according to Gates at the time, would happen if we didn’t shut the entire country down until there is a cure. A vaccine, preferably. Indeed.
Using Saul Alinsky’s tactic #9, “the threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself,” Gates had well-positioned himself when the pandemic hit to strike an unrealistic amount of fear in people’s minds. From that, he was able to drive behavior on a massive, global scale.
With Gates’ heavily-funded, over-exaggerated projection models and pre-COVID simulation trial, along with so many other “coincidentals,” it becomes difficult to ignore his involvement in the pandemic right down to the very last detail.
Whatever one chooses to believe about who the real Bill Gates is, the truth is emerging about the role of “Gain of Function” (GoF) research in the emergence of the CCP virus from the Wuhan lab. With Anthony Fauci’s now obvious interaction with and knowledge of GoF research finally exposed, his personal relationship with Bill Gates deserves so much more scrutiny.
Part II of this series about who the real Bill Gates is⏤will reveal the truth about what was once considered “conspiracy theories” by the “fake news” media. When you learn about Agenda 201, the ID2020 Alliance, those in bed with the W.H.O., and the Gates-Fauci connections, the “Plandemic” will begin to make a whole lot more sense. Image: Bloomberg
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.