I have been muzzled for the last two months. I have been instructed not to speak freely and not to speak my mind to friends, verbally or in writing, on the internet, in media, or in personal correspondence. I have been told to preserve all my papers, my emails, my letters, and records of phone calls, as well as all internet transactions. I have been instructed to await legal service — the action of being officially informed of this legal suit. The lawsuit is already formally filed with the US District Court in the Western Region of the State of Virginia.1
Although I have done nothing wrong, and my husband Peter R. Breggin, M.D. has done nothing wrong, we have had a lawsuit filed against us, falsely accusing us of defamation and demanding $25,350,000.
That is 25 million dollars.
Remaining silent as this suit works its way through the legal process is generally the conservative and expected advice from legal counsel. Getting a resolution can take years. I have complied to this point with our attorneys’ advice because I respect their opinions and experience. But there are larger issues here than what is best for us.
I have also been afraid. I have been deeply fearful and have tried my best to comply while I struggled with my fear, my confusion, and my anger over being muzzled, my heartbreak about the manipulations and fear I have seen around me. I have wrestled with my burning desire, to tell the truth about what is happening to me, because it affects us all, especially those of us who are speaking out about issues of freedom, of good health, free speech, the dangers of the COVID catastrophe, and of the traditional rights and responsibilities of free Americans and citizens from all countries seeking freedom.
I have finally concluded that I would rather be afraid as I exercise my God-given rights and responsibilities as a free American than to be muzzled, afraid to speak the truth.
The experience of being muzzled has given me a renewed appreciation of America, traditional American values, and the freedoms we all have traditionally enjoyed. I have always had every respect for American jurisprudence and the Rule of Law.
Author’s note: The Breggins have established a GiveSendGo Fund to help deter costs of the legal suit: GiveSendGo – Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin Legal Defense: The #1 Free Christian Fundraising Site.
Be Quiet, Do Not Disagree, Do Not Speak Out
The result of silencing us by bringing this lawsuit against us mirrors the attempts of government authorities to silence critics of COVID policies and mandates. Be quiet, do not disagree, do not speak out. Comply. Noncompliance will result in the worst consequences imaginable…..
Who brought this suit? Was it the US Justice Department or the Centers for Disease Control, or was it, Klaus Schwab or Tony Fauci?
No…. A 25 million dollar defamation lawsuit has been brought against my husband and me by Robert W. Malone, MD.
The suit has been brought against my husband and me, who have between us more than 110 years of public reform work.2 Three other entities are named in the suit.
What were we doing? What in the world have the Breggins done to deserve a lawsuit demanding $25,350,000?
The Danger of the Diagnosis of Mass Formation Psychosis
We sounded the alarm about the danger of creating a new diagnosis labeling “masses” of humans as psychotic — the informal diagnosis created by Dr. Robert Malone called “Mass Formation Psychosis.3,4,5,6,7 That phrase is Dr. Malone’s creation and is based on the work of his friend Mattias Desmet, author of the book The Psychology of Totalitarianism. While Desmet’s term of Mass Formation attempts to describe what he believes is a sociological phenomenon, Dr. Malone’s term of Mass Formation Psychosis (the psychosis term added by Dr. Malone) is a diagnosis building upon already formalized diagnoses of psychosis.8 The fact that a medical doctor is creating a diagnostic term lends gravitas and further potential for abuse against COVID resisters and other reformers, and any other groups the authorities want to further control.
The term diagnosis is defined as (a) the art or act of identifying a disease from its signs and symptoms and (b) the decision reached by diagnosis. Physicians making a diagnostic pronouncement have a special authority based upon their training and certification.
Because psychiatry as a profession has been used in many countries and during many decades as the “enforcer” of compliance and because we have the documentation and knowledge of this psychiatric abuse in greater detail than perhaps any other person and certainly any other reformer, we felt duty-bound to sound the alarm about this dangerous diagnostic trend of psychiatrically labeling groups of people as psychotic.
To this day, psychiatry is continuing to be used as a weapon to silence those who are trying to exercise their own free autonomy and protect the autonomy and sovereignty of others. We continue to wonder why Dr. Malone is promoting this concept of mass formation psychosis with such fervor.9 It appears that our criticism of this concept is why he is going to such extremes to put an end to our speaking out.
Ironically, our act of raising the alarm on a new psychiatric weapon to silence dissent has resulted in another kind of weapon being used to silence us.
Corona Insanity
One of the first uses of a diagnosis of insanity or psychosis being made about a person resisting the COVID narrative occurred in February of 2020. Dr. Thomas Binder, a respected cardiologist, practicing for 24 years in Switzerland, spoke out against the unscientific lockdowns, mandates, the PCR testing, and more. After posting a blog on his website on the Coronavirus topic, he was reported to the police as a threat to himself and the government.
Citizen Free Press reports, “Two days later, the day before Easter, Dr. Binder was brutally confronted by a total of 60 armed police officers including 20 officers with the…anti-terrorism unit, ARGUS. After examining Dr. Binder’s blog posts, social media posts, and emails, police realized Dr. Binder was not a threat and had no history of mental illness. As a result, police did not issue an arrest warrant. Instead, officers sent an emergency doctor to evaluate Dr. Binder’s mental health status, and he was diagnosed with “Corona Insanity” and then placed in a psychiatric unit.”
Psychiatric Drugs as a Tool to Silence Critics
Dr. Binder was forced to take a psychiatric drug — a neuroleptic (also known as an antipsychotic) that is the strongest class of psychiatric drug available as a condition of his eventual release.10,11 This was, of course, a huge violation of Dr. Binder’s human rights, civil rights, and medical autonomy, and personal safety. Antipsychotics are extremely dangerous and expose the “patient” to serious and potentially permanent disfiguring and disabling side effects.12
Likewise, psychiatry has a long a sordid history of being smack in the middle of controlling individuals and groups of people that the powers that be do not like. One of the most shocking examples of psychiatry leading the way in oppression was the role of psychiatry in Nazi Germany, which led up to the murder of more than 6 million Jews and others who were considered troublemakers or outcasts.13
Legal Actions as a Tool to Silence Critics
Now a different weapon has been drawn. A legal action threatens to bankrupt and impoverish the targeted reformers if they do not shut up. The other entities will need to speak for themselves, but in my opinion, this suit is aimed at shutting up our criticisms of Dr. Robert Malone’s theory of mass formation psychosis.
We do not know how many other people have been intimidated into silence, but we know it is happening to others. If but a few begin to go public, the power of his unfounded legal threats will evaporate. He will have to stand toe to toe in public debate.
Why Dr. Robert Malone is so intent on suppressing a debate on mass formation psychosis and other matters of public policy and Constitutional freedoms remains uncertain. Dr. Malone did publicly announce he would like to be appointed into a high government position. This announcement was made months ago to Steve Bannon during a live War Room show.14 Dr. Malone is now also bringing out his long-promised book. And Dr. Malone is just launching his next organization: The Malone Institute.15
Dr. Malone has experienced his share of criticism in the past, both from the legacy media16,17,18 and from the reformer community.19,20,21 As a result of the Washington Post coverage, Dr. Malone sued that newspaper.22 He also went after Alex Berenson in his Substack after Berenson challenged him on FOX news.23,24
Our last column before the defamation lawsuit was filed was about Dr. Malone’s attacks upon leaders in the freedom movement, such as Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Harvey Risch, and an organization of which they are a part called The Wellness Company.25
Most recently, Dr. Malone is attacking Stew Peter’s life-saving new film: Died Suddenly, and by association, the brave physicians and other professionals who provided the vital data in the film. In this attack, Dr. Malone joins the Big Tech social media censors.26,27 On his Telegram, Dr. Malone says: “Died Suddenly” Is Typical Trash from Stew Peters….”
Our world needs more discussion, conversation, argument, dissent, investigation, and increased awareness, not less. No single human being is going to dig us out of the dangerous and increasingly deadly situation we all find ourselves in. We need many leaders, many scientists, many points of view. We all wish, perhaps, that there was a single unified movement that would lead us to safety. There is no superhero, no super world council to save us. That kind of concept only works in the movies.
What we need is an alert and aware citizenry adding their voices to the cries for investigations. We all must be heard. Speaking out, speaking up, disagreeing, questioning, all of that is part of citizenship and the making of public policy and, for that matter, the evolution and development of science. Public policy and science benefit from the sunshine of transparency, examination, and exposure. Using serious legal actions such as cease and desist demands and lawsuits alleging defamation need to be reserved for genuine egregious actions, not as a tool to silence critics or any other individuals within our outside the movement for regaining health freedom and fundamental human liberties in America and in the world.
Author’s note: The Breggins have established a GiveSendGo Fund to help deter costs of the legal suit: GiveSendGo – Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin Legal Defense: The #1 Free Christian Fundraising Site.
Primary author Ginger Ross Breggin. She and her husband, Peter R. Breggin MD, are the authors of the bestselling new book COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey, with introductions by top COVID-19 scientists and physicians, Peter A. McCullough MD, MPH; Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD; and Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko MD. Over 120,000 sold.
1 https://breggin.com/Breggins-Sued-by-Dr-Robert-W-Malone-for-25-million-dollars
2 www.breggin.com
3 A Much Better Explanation than “Mass Psychosis” — One That Encourages Freedom – America Out Loud
4 Psychotherapist Mattias Desmet Failed to Report His Own Mass Murderer Patient – America Out Loud
5 Mass Formation and Mass Psychosis: A False and Dangerous Concept that Threatens Our Freedom – America Out Loud
6 The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators – America Out Loud
7 Mattias Desmet: Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse? The Full Story – America Out Loud
8 https://breggin.com/article-detail/post_detail/Desmet-credits-Malone-for-adding-psychosis-to-the-term-mass-formation
9 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/sins-of-information-warfare
10 https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/dr-thomas-binder-i-was-sent-to-psychiatric-hospital-for-speaking-out-against-covid-lockdowns/
11 This vaccine news is insane, I mean crazy, I mean… | Redacted with Clayton Morris – YouTube
12 https://breggin.com/article-detail/post_detail/toxic-psychiatry
13 https://breggin.com/article-detail/post_detail/never-again-the-real-history-of-psychiatry
14 Breggin.com | Malone Admits Political Aspirations
15 THE MALONE INSTITUTE
16 Robert Malone Spreads Falsehoods About Vaccines. He Also Says He Invented Some. – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
17 The tangled history of mRNA vaccines (nature.com)
18 How Robert Malone, vaccine scientist spreading misinformation, was embraced by Joe Rogan, anti-vaxxers – The Washington Post
19 Dr. ‘Robert Malone’ WARNS Something Strange Is Happening Worldwide, Tearing Our Movement Apart (rumble.com)
20 The Death of the Grown-Up | Diana West > Home – Dr. Robert Malone: A Risk Analysis
21 STOP Citing The Themis Report! It’s Hot Garbage! – America Out Loud
22 Malone Sues Washington Post – DocumentCloud
23 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/bushwhacked-by-alex-berenson-on-fox
24 Microsoft Word – Jill’s letter about RNA vaccination generic v5 June2021.docx (squarespace.com)
25 Dr. Robert Malone Attacks and Maligns Leading Freedom Fighters – America Out Loud
26 New ‘Died Suddenly’ Film Pushes Unfounded Depopulation Claims About Covid-19 Vaccine (forbes.com)
27 https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/anti-vax-film-e2-80-98died-suddenly-e2-80-99-is-littered-with-fake-claims-testing-boundaries-of-musk-e2-80-99s-twitter/ar-AA14qbjW
I’m horrified that pathetic Farmer/Doctor Malone is so full of horseshit he wants to crush others like Dr. Breggin just to get his 30 pieces of silver.
What he’s attacking is actually all of us by extension. His vindictive act of suing the Breggins is indefensible. Clearly Malone is an operative for the dark forces behind this bioweapon pandemic and it’s injectable counterpart, the ClotShot. The Breggins are Civil Rights activists with a long record of positive action for the oppressed. Malone? An openly malevolent opportunist who has ties to that vile mRNA poison. His fluffy, bearded, I’m on your side folks demeanor doesn’t fool us.
If anyone wondered about Malone’s sincerity and goodwill, you finally have your answer.
Agree. Anyone who’s been watching the insanity (beyond just COVID) play out for the past 6 years and bothers to research and think for themselves knows that when Dr. Malone came on the scene, it was highly suspicious. Those suspicions are raised over and over again. Though he talks a good game (can sell his heart and good intentions like a professional actor), his positions on the truth, defamatory comments toward genuine truth seekers and fighters, and professional history reveal his true nature. He is the epitome of controlled opposition. NOT someone to support, but rather someone to out. Thank you, Dr. and Mrs. Breggin, for not staying quiet. This lawsuit speaks volumes! Don’t trust Dr. Malone.
Malone peddles toxic poison to children. Watch this 2-minute excerpt from one of Malone’s videos, in which he indirectly but cunningly promotes and peddles toxic injections – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pven5dXofOc&t=14s
You are so right–controlled opposition. He has fooled many people–but, he should watch out–people are waking up.
I am genuinely confused by those who hop on the nearest soapbox yelping about the need for goodwill, sincerity, healthy public discourse etc… and then begin their diatribe with viscous attacks and destructive descriptives such as; “pathetic farmer… full of horse sh&t…dark forces…malevolent opportunist…” and then end their rattling with childish attacks on physical appearance.
Seriously??
Neither party should be airing their laundry publicly; an infantile attempt to get innocent bystanders to feel they must “choose a side”… and to include “other aggrieved parties” such as Berenson, etc, (whom I suspect did not ask to be publicly mentioned in this piece), may appear on its surface an act of “protective, shared indignation”, when in actuality it is an effort to align with other well-respected names in the hope of benefiting from the goodwill of their reputations…; an unfair manipulation of an unsuspecting audience…
Not one person reading and commenting knows ALL of the pertinent details of what lead to this case.
The vast majority of readers have supported both of these specialists and came to them seeking opinion, experience, guidance, and help during times of unprecedented global unrest… no one was concerned with choosing “sides” because we were all desperate to calm our fears… now that its obvious whats been going on globally, and we are no longer in the same kind of survival mode we were in almost three years ago, our cocky rude selves have emerged and morphed into Lord of the Flies bullies…
If this is how we treat each other after surviving the emotional and physical trauma of covid, we wont need to worry about the Globalist; we wont last long enough for them to enact their evil agenda… we will have beaten them to it. How sad…
Wise words where there is misinformation or genuine error all should feel free to critique after all this scientific method is the only way to progress. agree that psychiatry has been used as a convenient tool to suppress dissent in many regimes
Your post is as absurd as ” Hate Crimes”. As if anyone ever brutalized someone out of love, or offered laudatory comments regarding perceived traitorous fakes.
It has nothing to do with maturity, it’s fount is disgust.
“Nasus” this is a strange comment: “Not one person reading and commenting knows ALL of the pertinent details of what lead to this case.”
WHO would have the knowledge to make this comment–but, not explain it???
malone is a false front for vaccines.
Too bad MORONS like you can spew your crap. Malone is absolutely RIGHT. Hope Malone takes them to the CLEANERS.
Agreed! I have heard suspect things about him for at least a year – and remained on the fence , but open to further information. As you say, I now have my answer!
I’m a family doctor with formal training in psychiatry and I have always valued Dr. Peter Breggin’s writings on the harmful motivations an effects of psychopharmacotherapy. The Malone suit saddens me because 2 camps crucial to the repulsing of the medical tyranny juggernaut are fighting against each other. Although I disagree with the Breggins that the Desmet analysis of an obvious mass hysteria phenomenon has no utility in understanding our perilous slide towards totalitarian technocracy, I also can’t quite fathom why Malone regards the Breggins as his 25M Nemesis. If there is a back story I’d be curious to learn what it is. Otherwise, having defended myself against genuine defamation without a counter suit, I feel this personal battle is about splitting hairs and unfortunately serves no purpose other than weakening the causes of medical freedom, scientific integrity, and freedom to speak and think one’s individual ideas.
And what do I think should be done? All should recognize wisdom from wherever it may spring. Propaganda, intimidation and coercion have certainly instigated the calamitous global lockdowns and forced injections of the past 3 years. But human frailty, fear and lack of fortitude have surely enabled it. The genetic maiming of humanity by man’s own biotech research can be halted by strong principled objections among members of the scientific community. We are seeing this more and more at last. Likewise the descent of civilized society into dystopian chemical slavery can only be stopped by individuals who recognize the true meaning and value of freedom.
I agree…..both sides are in the same camp….both are fighting for medical freedom, scientific integrity, and freedom to speak and think one’s individual ideas. Retract the defamation and work towards the greater good.
Dr. Peter Breggin saved my life by sharing his wisdom, experience, insights and certainty, allowing me to feel supported in having faith in Nature and my healthy resilient body.
I was freed from horrific abuse after 30 years of violations of my freedom and true mental wellness, by evil adoptive parents who manipulated me and denied my true sanity, because they were evil.
There is no excuse for harassing The Breggins for sharing the truth that sets us free.
I am disgusted and saddened to hear of this dysfunctional and insane lawsuit and the terrorizing interference being directed towards truly heroic people who saved my life, and gave me real choices, and not drug-fueled abusive nonsense in perpetuity!
Thank you, Dr. Breggin and Ginger!
To the Breggins:
To the Breggins AND the Malones: you are all highly valuable for all the work you have done, and are among my pantheon of heroes. I have read much of your works, and I cannot find great fault with either. They are not the whole story by any means, but they are very valuabIe contributions. I am troubled that you four are now having a brawl in the public square, while those behind this Plandemic laugh up their sleeves. I don’t understand why you have failed to work this out in private.
Peter, you are not acknowledging that Robert contacted you and tried to work this out by peaceable means. Are you saying that he did not try to do so? Are you avoiding a discussion of the meat of his suit because the lawsuit is in process, that is, are you still muzzled? If so, you should say so…and perhaps reconsider going public if you are bound to leave out important details.
I have read the actual lawsuit language filed by Malone as he publicized it (it looks complete, but I have no way to tell if there may be things he did not disclose, or cannot disclose at this stage). Most important, the points that are raised in the suit as released have to do with purported slander against his good name, and he seems to feel that you have justified this by naming him as a part of the Controlled Opposition, and much more. Have you treated him with the respect you demand for yourself?
You are right to cite the abuses of psychiatry and be concerned about more, as we are seeing brilliant and innocent doctors like Meryl Nass being subjected to psych evals in order to keep their medical license. This is criminal. One writer sees a future where those who refuse the shots may be “diagnosed” with a psychiatric disorder. That is a problem as well. However, I watched the illustrated video explaining the idea of Mass Formation Psychosis twice, and there were many points which made sense to me, as a layperson. Perhaps they weren’t “medically correct,” or outside the purview of their profession, but I saw valuable insights there. We are clearly being manipulated with fear and misinformation.
Are you saying there is no value at all in what Malone and Desmet said? Is there no room for acknowledging what has value while you critique the rest, whether it is about content or the setting in which it is discussed? Do they as non-psychiatrists have the right to their own ideas, or would you censor them? Can we have a dispassionate discussion of the pros and cons, ala classical science?
In sum, when the story presented by both sides does not come close to matching up, it leaves us, in the bleachers, unable to sort things out or fully believe either of you. Not the basis for fundraising, my friends. The fact that you leave so many issues out of this article makes me wonder why that is so.
This is a very well reasoned response: Although I too, am struggling to understand the real issues here, I feel that the creeping cancour of litigation as ‘the’ way to conquour perceived ignorance, is a flawed and weak policy. Only lawyers seem to win. That these two Titans of free speech are fighting each other, is to me, a mystery and own goal. The establishment and Big Pharma will love this…
I do not think this is a reasoned response, although it sounds like it. The fact that, as a layperson, you find the mass psychosis diagnosis to contain valuable insights, is precisely the reasen the Breggins are so vehemently opposed to the idea. It is precisely that aspect that makes it so dangerous for us all. All the rest are details. Could the Breggins have framed differently? Possibly. Could they have shown more respect? Possibly. But the real question is why a public figure like Malone is going after these two elderly, outspoken professionals. There is nothing in there that even remotely looks like the ‘dispassionate discussion of pros and cons’ you aspire to.
Slander and defamation are not “free speech”. The Breggins ought to be grateful they don’t live in a Central or South American country where defamation charges are much easier to bring and to win in court!
I believe one clue as to Malone’s motivation is that while I can post here for free, Malone charges for that privilege, thereby discouraging all but the mist resolute of critics and insuring a sound proof Echo Chamber.
Am I the only one who wonders why Dr. Malone invented mRNA technology, who hired and paid him to do so, and whether he continues to make money from his “invention”?
By the way, he’s also suing Dr. Jane Ruby, I hear – also for twenty-five million.
My thoughts exactly
He didn’t “invent mRNA technology”. He developed a piece of the delivery mechanism necessary for the technology to function… and he did so decades ago at a time when it was viewed as a potential benefit to the world of science…
who is Dr. Jane Ruby
Defamation is “any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person’s reputation”.
However, a “limited-purpose public figure” (like Dr. Malone) who voluntarily places himself in the public eye consequently relinquishes some of this protection. False statements about limited-purpose public figures that relate to public controversies are not considered defamatory unless they meet the “actual malice” test.”
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/defamation
Good Morning. Yes. TOO easily has ‘Language’ been misrepresented/Altered to fit the ongoing NEO narrative. I’ve noticed this, even as a general Australian citizen, the NEW ‘Definitions’ of such things as ‘A Vaccine’, terrorism & Mis/Dis information, in the Major Dictionaries, & of course MISuse in Mainstream & Social media Platforms is a given, to fit Nonsensical Psych & No Challenge ‘pHARMa God Science’ Stratagem! Sorry! That’s suppose to say ‘CONsensus Science’. ( A small side diversion on ‘Language’ – Is that CONscience or personal conscience?) Plus, the general population HAVE been conditioned over time, to be PRO compliance of THE STATE – Whatever the ‘State’ has become these days! Most ‘State’s’ have become COMIC PETS! THE ‘State’ is NON Country specific, but a Descriptive of Politic/Technocrat illegally operating criminal cabal (Even if this represents Amoral enterprises)- Acronyms for entertainment factor;
Corporate Organised Military Industrial Complex. – Pretty Easily Trained Stupidos.
Currently, with the ‘Operations’ of CONVID # Something, including MSMs descriptions of CONVID’s ‘Grandchildren’ being a ‘Threat’ (?), & generally NON resistance from the still ‘Diverted’ Sheeple, the Ego’s & Power perversions ( This includes the ‘Newbies’, Aka New Kids on the ‘Resistance Block’- Maybe, now, formerly on their Pro State Pat Malone), of upper echelon ‘Puppets’ seems to show no limits, or programmed ‘Stoppage’ – 31 March 2025 apparent ‘End’ of CONVID 19 Strategic Preparedness & Response Program (SPRP) – GOOD NEWS, brought to us, by our ‘Friends’ @ The World Bank – Their project # P173789.- Started 02/April 2020.
Sliding Scale Egos make us what we are, But Malice is OVERRATED, & a showing of the Lack of ‘Something’! If you suffer from this ‘Disease’, the Solution has an easy remedy -Grow Up, drop the Ego in the Bucket, & ‘Help’ a Common Cause, against a Common Insult to Humanity, & by default, ALL species on OUR Planet!
Wellness to the Genuine Folk – Please keep at it Young Peter & Ginger!
Dr. Malone has shown his true colours as totalitarian dark grey. At a time of supreme crisis for freedom and free speech across the entire Free World, he has attempted to silence his critics in the most savage, callous and unethical manner. Rather than argue with integrity and sincerity through open and honest debate he has cowardly and selfishly chosen to take draconian legal measures. These are dictatorial measures of oppression, designed to silence an entire sector of genuine public criticism. It’s a traitorous attack on us all. He’s attacking the vibrant grass-roots of the Freedom Movement (whilst feigning freedom activism himself) and acting like a tyrant atuned to these Orwellian treacherous times. His actions through this obscene lawsuit are an outrageous, ugly, egotistical, shabby and shallow sabotage of free speech itself. I have the greatest respect for Dr. Breggin and Ginger Breggin and thank them most sincerely for their courageous and eloquent independent stance and shrewd interpretations of the dire globalist tyranny, plotters and conspirators we’re facing. Stay radiant and strong, ever spiritually elevated and gracefully defiant in boldly fighting off this foe of freedom. Don’t let this egotistical bully prevail! Please don’t allow yourselves to be gagged by this globalist legal variant of Communist Convid-1984. We cannot allow ourselves to be silenced by these dark totalitarian tactics. “They” don’t own us! Not now. Not ever.
The Breggins are Legends. National Treasures.
Venue and Jurisdiction is essential to establish in situations like this complaint.
Is this a criminal, civil, or equity complaint? Administrative court is part of the 1947 FDR/Congressional treason therefore is like being taken to court by Walmart for wearing the wrong colored shoes in their stores.
Slander and Libel are only a crime IF THEY ARE NOT TRUE.
The one bringing the complaint has the burden of proof to demonstrate that it is true.
In order to claim injury there has to be PROOF OF HARM. In the case of loss of money it has to be documented not an alleged feeling.
Where are the financial spreadsheets during discovery?
In the case of loss of reputation there has to be clear evidence that has occurred.
Where is the direct printed evidence and witness testimony that substantiates the claim?
A countersuit for malicious prosecution, wasting the State’s time and money, pain and suffering, and whatever else is provable might be in order as well.
Earlier this year, Jeff Witzeman of Health Freedom for Humanity (HFFH) questioned Malone’s vaccine development project, his ties to DARPA and the CIA, and the fact that he hadn’t spoken out against the childhood vaccine schedule. Two days later, Malone posted a vicious Substack attacking the organization, accusing them of defamation and slander (and “fragging,” specifically defined by Malone as “murder”). He then doxed HFFH’s members and coaxed his readers to contact them.
Witzeman’s name disappeared from the newsletters, HFFH’s voice got quieter and quieter, and a few months later, the organization dissolved.
This is how Robert Malone operates. He is an agent of chaos.
categorically incorrect…
he has spoken many times about childhood vaccines! but some people believe unless he is against ALL vaccines, he must be “aligned with the enemy”…. what kind of logic is that?
You seem very knowledgeable about Malone. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to exactly what he was saying about childhood vaccines in January of this year when Witzeman called him out.
The point of my comment was to describe yet another example of Malone’s targeted destruction of a thriving freedom movement. It is what he does, and you would be wise to take notice.
I had never heard this before about Jeff Witzeman of Health Freedom for Humanity (HFFH). This really alarms me! His connections and the fact that he would coax his readers to contact and attack this group. This sounds like an attack on free speech and is quite frightening about what he is capable of (which, of course, we see with the lawsuits). I wonder what other ‘truthers’ think of him?
The more I think on this subject, I cannot see justification for a defamation suit.
If Robert Malone really cares about the freedoms and rights of the people he claims to stand up for, he’d put his Big Boy Pants on and deal with it.
Dr. Breggin stated he offered to discuss it with him and crickets, so Malone had the opportunity to defend his stance and by default, refused.
This refusal is no better than so many in our current culture who seem to resort to avoidance rather than standing behind their words. This is avoidance and frankly a disgusting tactic in order to maintain his reputation and to fund his pursuits.
I’ve list all respect for Malone due to his inability to be civil and accept Dr. Breggin’s proposal for discussion. That’s a blow of epic proportions. It reminds me of elementary school where a child didn’t like someone so they cried to the teacher even though the other one did nothing wrong.
Malone is written off my list of those who are in this fight for freedom and truth. He cannot be trusted and it makes me wonder if he was never on the side of truth and freedom.
It’s his own undoing, Dr. Breggin has been a beacon for decades and has the history to back him up. I’ve been following him for many, many years.
My prayers are with the both of you and the others who are in Malone’s line of fire.
How can you state “you’ve lost all respect for Dr Malone” based solely on the opinions written by one of the people party to the lawsuit?? Not one of us is privy to the facts behind the drama embroiling these parties… if your respect is so easily lost, one cant help but question its legitimacy to begin with…
So well said Liz! This lawsuit is appalling from every angle I see it from. Dr. Breggin is a beacon of light to so many of us–so many who don’t even know this is happening to him and his wife. I will never trust Robert Malone after he has gone after these saintly people!!!
Malone hasn’t yet written anything on his substack regarding his lawsuit against the Breggins. I’m dismayed, and have suspicions that it’s a SLAPP or similar strategy. There presently seems to be little awareness among Malone’s subscribers and other followers about it.
Malone has posted the entire complaint on his substack. In the section “Statement of Material Facts” it’s hard to find anything quoted there which demonstrates “actual malice”, or justifies the ridiculous amount of “damages” he claims. On the contrary, it looks like an attempt to intimidate and financially harm the Breggins and America Out Loud.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/just-the-facts?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=87613609&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
The lawsuit by Malone certainly does appear to be a SLAPP lawsuit intended to harass and silence the Breggins, and to disqualify Peter Breggin as an expert witness who could testify in future investigations and hearings about whether the “diagnosis” of “mass formation psychosis” is a real “thing,” or is just a totalitarian tactic to silence dissenters. Certainly makes me question everything Malone says.
He posted the facts of the suit but has refrained from persuading his readers to take a side… something we all appreciate.
Since Malone has not tried to persuade his readers to take a side says much about his character and motives as compared to the Breggins. Malone simply is hurt by the probaganda presented against his character and wants it reconciled. These people need to wake up and realize they are different aspects on the same side.
It seems to me that both parties, the Ginger and Peter Breggin one and the Desmet and Malone one, have valuable perspectives for everyone to consider. It seems a real shame that such a disagreement has arisen between those who should be allies. Some good people are too quick to draw their law suits out of their holsters, I believe.
I think some of what you, Our Beloved Breggins, have published or spoken seems outlandish for the human or “carnal mind” to absorb. But what if share what I believe? This is going to sound outlandish to some– but is in a widely excepted belief system.
There are Fallen Angels and Watchers powerful enough to influence millions by the light in their chakras they brought to Earth when they were cast out of Heaven by Archangel Michael. There are the Nephilim. Their offspring.
A simplification of a Teaching is as follows: The “Seed of the Wicked” as mentioned in the bible are actually descendants of these Fallen Ones. Some were clones. Some were offsprings of the clones, etc. So there are many on earth that have mixed genes.- A mix of the “seed of Abraham” and The Wicked.
The current population has re-imbodied for thousands of years. They follow their creators– or have a schism between creators if they have mixed genes. That is why there is no logic behind their support for the suicide of America by feeding the enemy with our light, our money supply, and our technology.
Then we have the sympathizers with evil that have lost their way from their origin of Light. So you see I tend to have some agreement with Robert Malone about the Mass Psychosis theory. But for different reasons!
I believe there may be a certain subconscious tie– possibly through sympathy or mixed genes– that these black magicians and fallen ones can use to divide and conquer. The teaching from Jesus telling Peter, “get behind thee satan” when he suggested Jesus did not need to be crucified is a good teaching for this example.
If you, the Breggin Team, are wrong. And Malone is right. Does a healthy disagreement warrant tearing apart a discussion among peers by a lawsuit? So, Mr. and Mrs. Breggin is there any apology that can be given to Dr. Malone so everyone can politely disagree?
Finally, regarding psychosis: How in the world do people actually believe that climate change is manmade? I’ve visited the petrified forest in AZ. I have seen the rainforest that is now a desert. If evolutionists are correct, man was not in that rainforest with advanced technology. Man didn’t cause the earth to warm by breathing out carbon dioxide at the time of the petrified rain forest. Or were they?
I am a fan of both the Breggins and Dr. Malone, and am not happy with this and related internecine battles — they do nothing but distract from our COVID truth and justice movement.
The issue of whether or not mass formation constitutes a psychosis is transparent and irrelevant to most people, and it is apparent to me Dr. Malone was speaking to/dumbing down for the masses. I have seen no evidence that Dr. Malone in any way alleviated or redirected blame from those responsible for this massive deception; in fact he has been stepping up his attacks against them.
It is also apparent to me that Dr. Breggin, as much as I respect him (and his wife), felt Dr. Malone invaded his turf and chose to respond publicly. That was a mistake, and it hurt the movement. A disagreement such as that should have been handled privately.
But I don’t agree with the lawsuit — surely it is intended to send a message, and it appears that message has been received. At this point I would like to see Dr. Malone drop it, or settle for legal fees incurred. We won’t win this battle by fighting amongst ourselves.
I will continue to subscribe to Dr. Malone’s Substack and listen here to the Breggin’s excellent and very entertaining show. Can’t we all just get along?
“I would like to see Dr. Malone drop it, or settle for legal fees incurred”
Malone needs to drop the suit, apologize, and pay the defendants some modest legal fee $, showing good faith.
And we need to make this clear to the duped hosts in media who still give Malone air time.
“If it was bad, the government wouldn’t allow it.” Ever have that thought? It came into my mind in about 1959 while walking on a sidewalk in an American city with commercial and military radio transmitter towers nearby. I’ve thought about that occurrence ever since, puzzling how that thought came from out of the blue because it was a surprise. Although subliminal advertising is illegal in the UK, there’s apparently no law against it in America.
“If it was bad, the government wouldn’t allow it.”
This assumes that warnings of conspiracies are invalid and no one is giving bad advice and directives to government and no one in government is in any kind of secret society or globalist oligarchy and subject to the same. It assumes that those in government and influential NGOs and businesses are honest moral people. Do you feel lucky? History and a careful examination of it shows that the above view point is not justified and there are plenty of bad actors in charge of the world. It isn’t the satanic psychopath and pervert in society and government that is reviled and sent to the sin bin but more often than not it is the man of truth and moral principle that is held in contempt or worse by the government, MSM and the brainwashed masses. We live in a time when the devil, his children and worshippers are fighting a rear guard action as they seek ultimate power in this world. They fear that a few good people might step up to take it all away for the sake of Jesus, truth and justice. Fear leads to lying and lying leads to murder and worse.
I’m just diving into this as an admirer of Dr. Malone, and finding this situation really, really weird. You say that you’ve just engaged in fair, free speech commentary and questions about him in your high volume broadcasts. But his citations in his defamation law suit with you cite instances where you’re intensely maligning his character and reputation and circulating wild claims about him being a mass murderer, Hitler-esque, an attacker of colleagues, connected to evil military agendas, duplicitous and a liar on a grand scale, etc. Your pieces are picked up by other media keen on vilifying doctors in the health freedom movement as “quacks.” So I can see where his claims of damage by you in your wild, extreme, exaggerated claims re: him are grounded. I’ve seen him disagree, respectfully, with his close colleagues like McCullough, but not undermine those folks cruelly and baselessly like you claim he has. Honestly, the vibe I get here is that something is very fishy about how you’ve gone after him so fiercely, on such flimsy grounds, when he’s been doing such good work and his Substack commentaries are so clear, congruent, intelligent, substantive, of good will, with solid foundation laid and explained and sourced, re: his positions, history, moves in the field, statements he makes and why, etc. The fishy-west piece of all is how you, as a psychiatrist (?!) have gone after him sooo hard for his putting forward the idea, along with Desmet, of America seeming to be under a spell of what used to be (for many decades) called, in textbooks, “mass psychology.” Different name now, as this observation gets fine tuned, but, geez, honestly, as a psychiatrist, surely you must be aware of how valid and real the phenomenon is of mass hypnosis of crowds, mass unconscious conformity that happens under the spell of charismatic leaders & orchestrated messaging campaigns, etc. This really is a form of “mass psychosis,” that’s very real and literal, studied and validly cited over at least a century. It’s happening now with the influence of new technology and media messaging & pervasive influence and orchestrated media campaigns by governments, industrial giants who can buy this messaging and influence techniques, etc. Maybe sociologists understand this more than psychiatrists. Many great books have been written, over many years, on this topic, and it’s kind of self-evident as well as empirically studied & validated. The fact that you’re refuting this well known social delusion effect as Malone and Desmet cite it, is very puzzling. And your conflating the existence of it and the citing of it in operation as mutually exclusive with these guys also knowing that the perpetrators of it are the central parties to blame, pulling in and programming unconscious victims, is very odd and a blatant cognitive bias/straw man argument that I would think someone of your caliber, history, & experience would be way beyond implementing. This is a good man – no real evidence to the contrary. Why the fierce attacks and defamations, what’s the agenda? Has some entity from the real layer of social control and negative agenda gotten to you with payment or threat, to be trying to tear apart this man and sow all this un-grounded speculative doubt about him, riling people up and splitting up this great movement? Looks that way. Will be staying tuned to see if there’s something I’m missing here – but your attacks of him look ridiculous, unscholarly, strange, with very flimsy and odd attempts to justify, so far. Don’t like to see anyone be financially ruined, but it does seem like you’ve been destroying this man’s public reputation and social equity and positive effect, with great damage, on very flimsy grounds, so this is what happens when someone does that. The whole thing with the speculative attacks on him and his good work seem so unnecessary, immature, strange, and destructive to the cause you claim to represent. Hope you’ll be explaining this more, going forward, in some kind of way that’s much more grounded & reasonable – or issuing retractions & apologies to mend the damage that’s been done.
We have great, deep admiration for Dr. Peter Breggin and Ginger Breggin. We follow them, read them, love them. They will not get intimidated. They are intelligent, very human and great professionals.
malone is a controlled opposition fraud. this lawsuit is frivolous.
Mr. Malone makes no sense at any given time. He said that in autumn 2020 he was reviewing the Covid vaccines for the US government. His conclusion was that they were not safe and alternatives should be made available. A few months later he has two shots of the vaccines that he himself declared to be unsafe.
There is also an interesting co-relation. Peter Breggin announced earlier this year that in his next book, he would like to focus on on the American military. Not long afterwards he becomes very much distracted from this task by Mr. Malone’s lawsuit. Curiously, Mr. Malone used to work for DARPA… Just a thought!
long read, but Malone’s part of the story (yes, in Wuhan and yes, as part of DARPA) – https://deathship.wordpress.com/2021/08/20/darpas-man-in-wuhan/
There was some suggestions that Malone was inflitrating and already working for the Government. It all seems like a get rich scheme to me.
In the meantime the Medical Medium suggestions of Brain Shots helps with coping skills, I highly recommend you look at his information on his website (free info there an on his podcasts, vids and books from the library).
All the best.
how can you sleep at night after spreading such gossip as “there was suggestion that Malone was infiltrating/working for the government…”
where are the facts to back this up? who said it? where did they work? This is school yard nonsense piling on in a manner not seen since Jerry Springer was a hit on TV…
It’s really shameful.
Just wondering if you’re paid to defend Dr. Malone? I’ve lost count of your replies to other posters… Seems a little personal or profitable to me.
Then this is a social science dispute.IMO it would be better for these two to have a formal debate and let people decide for themselves whether Mass Formation Psychosis exists at all. Drop the lawsuit and open the debate. This does not belong in a civil court. A debate would be interesting and could generate cash enough for both parties.
“Mass Formation” seems to mean, roughly, mass hypnotism. The dispute seems to be whose “fault” it is: 1. the totalitarian scum Elite perpetrating it or 2. the weak populace allowing themselves to be hypnotized. Maybe “mass brainwashing” is a better term. Anyway, I don’t see anything important in that argument, neither “Controlled Opposition” nor “Defamation.” Certainly not $25,350,000.00 either!
I know hundreds or thousands of people in uk that died a few days after covid 19 vaccine without any previous bad medical hystory. mr peter breggins books are protecting the whole planet from its own destruction.EVERYTIME A PERSON AGREES TO HAVE A COVID 19 VACCINE THE LOCAL GP OR HEATLH SERVICE GETS 100 POUNDS OF PROFIT. SO THIS IS WHITHOUT ANY DOUBT A NEW DANGER BUSINESS.the death certificates of thouse that dye after having covid 19 vaccine are changed to another cause of death to confuse people and prevent general public from know the truth.
Mr Peter Breggins works must be protected from any blasbhemy or extremist people as his books are A full authority and must be respected everywhere at all social media.universities and public advertisement agencies.
more urgent know for everyones intereset isTo also make alcohol,street and psquiatric drugs illegal ,also any addictive harmfull habits like killing innocent animals just to put smelly food in our tables or the controversial meat industry that cause danger green gases and violence ,wars and pandemics all over the world.you never saw LORD JESUS PROMOTING MCDONALDS….
This is a danger world of explotation .action and reaction.mr peter breggin acted always in a positive informative way. his work must be respected to prevent a premature end of the world and the tendency to protect life must be always be upkeeped.
He is a genuine reformer for any evil practices inside danger mental institutions.i believe germany,belgium,Italy la florida etc etc where right in making any psquiatric institution and practice ILEGAL THIS IS A SIGN OF COMMON SENSE AND DEVELOPMENT.
This confirms my long suspicions about Dr Malone. I was never 100% sold on this guy. Now I’m writing him off. I’ve read several of the Breggins books and believe in them. My father was a victim of bad psychiatric practise all his life. Absolutely did more harm than good.
free speech does not mean you get to say whatever you want without it having any consequences.
you cross the line and you may find some people will not take it lying down….
you got away with it for a long time but now you kicked the wrong guy in the balls….
from what i have read on this site you have not succeeded in grasping what desmet is proposing.
that “obscure” psychotherapist does happen to be a professor at a reputable university…
For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
(Ephesians 6:12 NKJV)
Please watch this to understand the issue of mass formation and other psychiatric labels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JPgpasgueQ
My Lord, after reading these comments, it’s no wonder “the other side” of “globalist elites” mocks us for our lack of facts and our willingness to throw our own under the bus…
I saw this guy on War Room today and he owes Robert Malone an APOLOGY. This guy is in the wrong and he KNOWS it. MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS is something that pyschiatrists are AGAINST. Instead of doubling down on nonsense, try admitting wrong once and see if it works.
Perhaps Alan Dershowitz can assist with your defense or provide advice. Here is his view of Hannah Arendt: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/alan-dershowitz-operation-finale-exposes-the-lie-of-hannah-arendts-banality-of-evil
To be accurate Citizen Free Press didn’t report ANYTHING, they merely aggregate news from other organizations-basically a Drudge Report wannabe.
I am so disgusted at Robert Malone and this absolutely ridiculous lawsuit. He clearly does not want ANYONE TO CRITICIZE HIM AT ALL. I think he is showing his true colors with this lawsuit. To sue people like the Breggins??? Peter Breggin has spent his life trying to help people who cannot fight back or help themselves (so ironic!). I was hearing about him many years ago– when he was standing up for people who were railroaded by a huge psychiatric system. I have admired him for many years.
ROBERT MALONE: SHAME SHAME SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 👿👿👿
First!!!
Have no clue on the back story to this lawsuit. Are the breggins totally against these poison jabs and their shady rollout ?. Are they as well saying that this covid scam did come from china ?. If they are i would think off hand they would be on the same side as malone. Malone was sued himself by the parents of a person whom was on video purported to have died from covid on the stew peters movie because he shared that video . He later retracted that post when he was made aware that individual did in fact not perish from covid or during covid , but was still sued nevertheless. So what is the back story on the breggins vs malone deal here ?.
I am genuinely confused by those who hop on the nearest soapbox yelping about the need for goodwill, sincerity, healthy public discourse etc… and then begin their diatribe with viscous attacks and destructive descriptives such as; “pathetic farmer… full of horse sh&t…dark forces…malevolent opportunist…” and then end their rattling with childish attacks on physical appearance.
Seriously??
Neither party should be airing their laundry publicly; an infantile attempt to get innocent bystanders to feel they must “choose a side”… and then to include “other aggrieved parties” such as Berenson, etc, (whom I suspect did not ask to be publicly mentioned in this piece), tho it may appear on its surface an act of “protective, shared indignation”, but in actuality is an effort to align with other well-respected names in the hope of benefiting from the goodwill of their reputations…; an unfair manipulation of an unsuspecting audience…
Not one person reading and commenting knows ALL of the pertinent details of what lead to this case.
The vast majority of readers have supported both of these specialists and came to them seeking opinion, experience, guidance, and help during times of unprecedented global unrest… no one was concerned with choosing “sides” back then because we were all desperate to calm our fears… but we’re no longer in the same kind of survival mode we were in almost three years ago, so our cocky rude childish selves have emerged and morphed into Lord of the Flies bullies…
If this is how we treat each other after surviving the emotional and physical trauma of covid, we wont need to worry about the Globalist; we wont last long enough for them to enact their evil agenda… we will have beaten them to it. How sad…