September 16, 2021

September 16, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Court Opinions Have Turned Eminent Domain into Court Sanctioned Theft

by | Aug 23, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

You may be familiar with the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. This requires that when private property is taken for public use, that the owner receives “just compensation.” The practice of taking private property for the public, called eminent domain, is nothing new in the world. However, the case of PennEast v New Jersey is the latest in a series of court opinions that have turned the idea of the eminent domain into court-sanctioned theft.

First, we need to acknowledge that eminent domain is a legitimate power of government.

The power to take private property for public use by a state, municipality, or private person or corporation authorized to exercise functions of a public character, following the payment of just compensation to the owner of that property.

Eminent Domain – The Free Legal Dictionary:  It’s just as important to know the limitations on this power established within the Constitution of the United States. These limitations are apparently lost on both Congress and the courts.

… nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

U.S. Constitution, Amendment V

With this in mind, let’s take a look at the problems with the case Penneast Pipeline v. New Jersey.

Building a Pipeline

Congress passed the Natural Gas Act in 1938 to regulate the transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce. To build an interstate pipeline, a natural gas company must obtain from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a certificate reflecting that such construction is or will be required by the present or future public convenience and necessity.” 15 U. S. C. §717f(e).

Penneast Pipeline v. New Jersey

We start with an act of Congress, the Natural Gas Act (NGA), passed in 1938. In its very first sentence, the court has already made a mistake. Congress has the authority to regulate interstate commerce, not interstate transportation.

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3

The problem is only a tiny semantic difficulty in this case. 15 USC §717f(C) does state that:

(2) The Commission may issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity to a natural-gas company for the transportation in interstate commerce of natural gas used by any person for one or more high-priority uses, as defined, by rule, by the Commission, in the case of-

(A) natural gas sold by the producer to such person; and
(B) natural gas produced by such person.

15 USC §717f(C)

That sounds good so far, right? The commission set up by Congress may issue certificates of public convenience and necessity to those who wish to sell natural gas across state lines. That, however, is not the entire law.

As disclosed in reports of the Federal Trade Commission made pursuant to S. Res. 83 (Seventieth Congress, first session) and other reports made pursuant to the authority of Congress, it is declared that the business of transporting and selling natural gas for ultimate distribution to the public is affected with a public interest and that federal regulation in matters relating to the transportation of natural gas and the sale thereof in interstate and foreign commerce is necessary for the public interest.

15 USC §717(a)

Congress simply declared that transporting and selling natural gas to the public is a public interest, and therefore interstate and foreign commerce. In other words, Congress effectively declared that any public interest was suddenly interstate commerce, regardless if it crossed state or national borders. Suddenly Congress claimed the authority to regulate whatever they consider a public interest. While this case does involve interstate commerce, we should recognize that the law this court is using is already unconstitutional, illegal, and void.

As originally enacted, the NGA did not provide a mechanism for certificate holders to secure property rights necessary to build pipelines, often leaving certificate holders with only an illusory right to build.

Penneast Pipeline v. New Jersey

The court notes that in the original NGA, the was no mechanism for certificate holders to “secure property rights.” It appears to the court this was a mistake, an oversight, while in fact, it was not only the law; it was the supreme law. As I’ve already quoted, the Fifth Amendment allows private property to be taken only for public use. Yet Congress later claimed the authority not only to take private property for private use but to authorize private entities to do so for it. In other words, the 1938 National Gas Act did not grant the power to secure property rights because the Constitution did not delegate that power to Congress.

Congress remedied this defect in 1947 by amending the NGA to authorize certificate holders to exercise the federal eminent domain power, thereby ensuring that certificates of public convenience and necessity could be given effect.

Nowhere in the Constitution is the United States authorized to exercise eminent domain to transfer property from one private entity to another. What this court refers to as a “defect” is called the supreme law of the land. Furthermore, the Constitution does not authorize the United States to delegate its eminent domain to another. Yet Congress simply spoke into existence this terrible power.

When any holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity cannot acquire by contract, or is unable to agree with the owner of the property to the compensation to be paid for, the necessary right-of-way to construct, operate, and maintain a pipeline or pipelines for the transportation of natural gas, and the necessary land or other property, in addition to right-of-way, for the location of compressor stations, pressure apparatus, or other stations or equipment necessary to the proper operation of such pipeline or pipelines, it may acquire the same by the exercise of the right of eminent domain in the district court of the United States for the district in which such property may be located, or in the State courts.

WATCH THE VIDEO AND SUBSCRIBE ON RUMBLE

C §717f(h)

Congress simply decided that they had the power to do whatever they think is necessary. This is not only a violation of the Tenth Amendment, but the very structure of our republic.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

U.S. Constitution, Amendment X

If we had a properly functioning judicial system, one that placed the language of the Constitution as the supreme law of the land and was dedicated to opining justly in all its cases, this law would have been recognized as unconstitutional decades ago. Instead, this law has not only been allowed to stand, but multiple courts have also ignored their oaths to support the Constitution and allowed Congress to effectively rewrite it for their benefit. So much for checks and balances. In their tradition of holding previous opinions above the Constitution, this court conveniently skips right over the constitutional problems, then goes on further to destroy property rights in America.

As relevant here, PennEast sought to condemn parcels of land in which either New Jersey or the New Jersey Conservation Foundation asserts a property interest.

Notice a couple of very important points here. Two groups, both the State of New Jersey and the New Jersey Conservation Foundation, “assert a property interest.” These entities don’t simply have a property interest; they have property rights. The very same Fifth Amendment that Congress uses as their authority for eminent domain states:

No person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

U.S. Constitution, Amendment V

Some of you may say, “Wait, Paul, these aren’t people. It’s a state and an organization.” But who controls the State of New Jersey? Who ultimately owns whatever is owned by the State of New Jersey? Don’t we call it public land? Yes, the land of the State of New Jersey is public land, but does that give Congress the authority to take land from a state? No, it doesn’t. And who owns the New Jersey Conservation Foundation? Who controls it? Isn’t it the people who ultimately own these properties? And since this land is not being taken for public use, this is not a Fifth Amendment taking. What this is, is government-sanctioned theft, with the blessing of the very same judicial branch that was created to protect our rights, including our right to property.

Held: Section 717f(h) authorizes FERC certificate holders to condemn all necessary rights-of-way, whether owned by private parties or States.

Section 717f(h) of the National Gas Act is unconstitutional, and therefore illegal and void, but this court simply ignores that inconvenient fact to get to this opinion.

The Preamble to the Constitution tells us:  We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

U.S. Constitution – Preamble

It is unfortunate, but what we have here is almost the exact opposite. We have a union that is being corrupted, justice that only exists for those who can pay for it, states are being pitted against each other, those who are to defend us are being used to persecute us, and the welfare of the powerful few are placed above the general population. Worst of all, the blessings of liberty are being ground under the foot of an ever more tyrannical government. This case is just the latest example of the failure of expecting those in government to act as a check and balance against each other. And every time states allow themselves and their citizens to be treated as subjects of the federal government, freedom, and liberty in America die just that much more. This is why John Jay said:

Every member of the State ought diligently to read and to study the constitution of his country, and teach the rising generation to be free. By knowing their rights, they will sooner perceive when they are violated, and be the better prepared to defend and assert them.

John Jay, First Chief Justice of the United States

Because the American people are generally ignorant of their constitution, their rights are being violated, and they don’t even know it. Because we expected the government to teach the rising generation to be free rather than doing it ourselves, the idea of freedom and liberty has become anathema to this generation. Because of our ignorance, we don’t know how to defend and assert our rights. Also, because of this ignorance, all branches of government at all levels are well on their way to converting the United States of America from the land of the free to the land of the subjected. The fact that we are letting this happen proves that we are no longer the home of the brave, but the home of cowards. The only reason for hope is that there is still a small glowing ember of the sacred fire of liberty. The question is, will the people of New Jersey, with the help of patriots across the nation, help fan that ember of liberty, or allow it to be crushed by those who pervert the Constitution?

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Death2Bolsheviks
Death2Bolsheviks
23 days ago

And when government parasites break the law, what happens to them? Their henchmen, the ‘police’, aren’t going to do anything to their bosses, they’re corrupt and amoral.

Just ask the tyrants to loosen up the shackles and don’t rape our daughters too often, please!

Men, ask your wives for your balls back, so you can be a man, for once!

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Covid-19, Social Standing, and the New World Order

Covid-19, Social Standing, and the New World Order

A government that can force people to take medical treatments against their wishes can do whatever it wants, and the fact that Joe Biden’s order is unconstitutional will not stop tens of millions of Americans from being forced to get vaccinated against their will, in order to continue supporting their families. By the time the Supreme Court shoots this order down (assuming they do), the damage will already be done…

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough, #3

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough, #3

We have had no side effects that we are aware of from the vaccine. Does this mean we are free from future side-effects? Should we forego any boosters? Did the vaccine destroy our natural immunity? Should I be more concerned about getting the virus or future variants? How accurate is the VAERS data? Join us on the Voice of a Nation for our third COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough…

The Unholy Alliance Between Big Pharma’s Vaccines and Drugs and the FDA

The Unholy Alliance Between Big Pharma’s Vaccines and Drugs and the FDA

One MD remarked on the day of the sham approval, Do they actually think that with a stroke of the pen—like a magic wand—“approval” suddenly occurs? Nothing the FDA, pharma, or otherwise says or do is a substitute for 10-12 years of research and development of a biologic. But, sadly, most of the world will believe so. The FDA increasingly fast-tracks expensive drugs and vaccines with significant side effects and unproven health benefits. According to FDA’s own employees, drug company payments bias regulators, with “an inclination toward approval.”

Spreading Hate and Racial Division Since 2009

Spreading Hate and Racial Division Since 2009

Indeed there are extremists here in this country that we need to be concerned with. They are the career politicians who stay in office for decades, an ‘extreme’ length of time for anyone to hold political office. And Barack Obama is an extremist. After all, he wants to “fundamentally transform” the United States…

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, Around Texas SB8

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, Around Texas SB8

If there is one constant in politics today, it’s that politicians lie. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s tweet is a perfect lie… “Republicans promised to overturn Roe v Wade, and they have. Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule.”

The Tragic Human and National Security Consequences of Biden’s Withdrawal

The Tragic Human and National Security Consequences of Biden’s Withdrawal

Epic blunders: abandoning our most strategic Bagram Air Base in the middle of the night without informing the Afghan military and our NATO allies, and leaving behind more than $80 billion of weaponry that has made the Taliban one of the world’s best-equipped military forces. Taliban trophies include more than 100 helicopters, including 33 Black Hawks, four C-130 transport planes, and about 60 other fixed-wing aircraft…

Risks of Vaccines for Those Recovered from COVID-19 – Krammer, Raw & Mathioudakis

Risks of Vaccines for Those Recovered from COVID-19 – Krammer, Raw & Mathioudakis

There are no studies demonstrating the clinical benefit of COVID-19 vaccination in COVID-19 survivors, and there are three studies demonstrating harm in such individuals. It is my opinion that SARS-CoV-2 causes an infection in humans that results in robust, complete, and durable immunity, and is superior to vaccine immunity which by comparison has demonstrated massive failure…

Header

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations.

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Apple Podcasts
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap