Two important regulatory developments are converging in the United States and the United Kingdom at the same time for the ill-fated COVID-19 investigational vaccines.
In America, the Centers for Disease Control has logged more grim milestones as of June 4, 2021, with 329,021 certified serious safety reports including 5,888 deaths and 19,597 hospitalizations. While the CDC has stated twice on their website that none of the deaths were caused by the vaccine, without external unbiased safety mechanisms including critical event committee, data safety monitoring board, and human ethics board, interpretation of the CDC causality claim can only be made in the context of semantics.
Since the majority of the deaths occur within a few days of the vaccine administration, if the vaccine did not directly “cause” the death, it was undoubtedly in the causal pathway of these temporally related fatalities.
Common narratives include vaccine-induced fatal heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and blood disorders. So, one could diagnose such a scenario as follows: the patient died of myocarditis, and the myocarditis was caused by the vaccine. So the CDC can say the vaccine did not cause the death, but it was obviously in the causal pathway to death.
Another way to argue the case is that if the patient would have declined the vaccine, then he or she would be alive today. Sadly, this is probably the case in 5,888 Americans that have died and confirmed by the CDC, and possibly tens of thousands not reported or still backlogged at the CDC.
In this issue of The McCullough Report, we have Dr. Hamid Merchant, an academic pharmacologist in the UK gives us the rationale why the COVID-19 vaccines are not sufficiently safe for full FDA approval. This is both good and bad. If the vaccines are not fully approved, this would be a blow to the propagandized mass vaccination program.
However, if the vaccines win approval, the full prescribing information and the televised advertisements must contain fair balanced information on safety which is not good for these products. An unfair package insert can be the basis for a lawsuit and removal of the product(s) from the market. Under the current, EUA, no such mechanism exists.
We also have Dr. Tess Lawrie, who is also based in the UK and is a well-recognized contract analyst to the WHO. She has submitted a report this week to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency with the conclusion that the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe for human use. Her analyses are unassailable and the MHRA has a problem on its hands. So strap in, headphones on, and let’s cycle our way through this next edition of The McCullough Report.
The McCullough Report: Sat/Sun 2 PM ET Encore 7 PM – Internationally recognized Dr. Peter A. McCullough, known for his iconic views on the state of medical truth in America and around the globe pierces through the thin veil of mainstream media stories that skirt the major issues and provide no tractable basis for durable insight. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa.
References:
– https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data (accessed June 15, 2021)
– https://www.authorea.com/users/414448/articles/522499-sars-cov-2-mass-vaccination-urgent-questions-on-vaccine-safety-that-demand-answers-from-international-health-agencies-regulatory-authorities-governments-and-vaccine-developers
– https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00315-w
– https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/08/why-we-petitioned-the-fda-to-refrain-from-fully-approving-any-covid-19-vaccine-this-year/
– https://freedomalliance.co.uk/2021/06/10/open-letter-from-dr-tess-lawrie-to-chief-exec-mhra-dr-raine-urgent-report-covid-19-vaccines-unsafe-for-use-in-humans/