I listened to about fifteen minutes of the podcast, because of Internet bandwidth limitations. In April 2021, China passed a new biosecurity biosafety law.
 

“The law took effect on April 15, 2021, thus finalizing the institutionalization of China’s biosafety/biosecurity legislations and marking a major milestone for China’s biosafety/biosecurity governance. The Chinese term, ‘shengwu anquan,’ used in the name of the law, denotes the protection of humans, animals, plants, and the environment from hazards or potential risks under two circumstances.2 The first, biosafety, is about such protection from the risks and hazards caused inadvertently by working with microorganisms and toxins and the second, biosecurity, refers to such protection from the hazards that may arise in connection with deliberate theft, misuse, or diversion of biotechnology.”—in the article, “China’s evolving biosafety/biosecurity Legislations”, by Cong Cao,Nottingham University Business School (China), University of Nottingham Ningbo China

 
The law focuses on deliberate misuse of biotechnology with strong penalties. And China and American scientists have always had good working relationships.
                                                                                          

“From 2004 to 2014, Chinese National Influenza Center and USCDC collaborated on the following activities: 1) developing human technical expertise in virology and epidemiology in China; 2) developing a comprehensive influenza surveillance system by enhancing influenza-like illness (ILI) reporting and virological characterization; 3) strengthening analysis, utilization and dissemination of surveillance data; and 4) improving early response to influenza viruses with pandemic potential. Since 2004, CNIC expanded its national influenza surveillance and response system which, as of 2014, included 408 laboratories and 554 sentinel hospitals.”, — in the article, ‘A ten-year China-US laboratory collaboration: improving response to influenza threats in China and the world, 2004–2014’, by
Yuelong Shu, Ying Song, and many others
 
 
Given this fact that Jinping is trying to clean up the Chinese biosecurity environment, and has had historically good working relationships with the U.S.,  do the authors of this podcast believe they are being too Cold War attituded towards our Rising Sun brothers.  

And China has its own version of capitalism, which they are always trying to improve.  

 
“Technology and AI are communism 2.0’s largely bloodless methods for extending total control over the population, making sure that every individual toes the party’s line. This compliance is also enabled by the emerging military surveillance industrial complex, which is going to be at the core of successful communist-capitalism.
More control means more job openings in this complex, directly translating into economic growth, that in turn will go back into financing that control – totalitarianism’s perfect feedback loop, with no way out. And so repression becomes recognised as the engine of the economy; a guarantee of prosperity for most (though not all).
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is exactly the type of ambitious project that the world’s democracies acutely lack at this moment in time. The plan is to link and build a coordinated network of railway, road and maritime corridors to span all of Africa, Asia and Europe for the seamless export of products from China and the easy import of raw materials to this communist powerhouse.”, in the article, ‘How China combined authoritarianism with capitalism to create a  New communism’, by Tomasz Kamusella,  October 26, 2021    

                                                       
Is Dr. Yan’s fear of future Chinese bioweapons, consistent with China’s continually improving its capitalistic tendencies, and improving its biosecurity and biosafety laws, and it globalistic outreach tendencies, as has been practiced by Western nations for over 500 years.   Quit the fearmongering, and get on the BRI.
  
                                                         
Dr. Yan used the word propaganda and misinformation by the CCP freely throughout the podcast.   Just based own what she wrote in her Yan report 2 (‘SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon’), my own personal view is that she presents some good science most of the times, speculative conclusions in many instances, and overall there is an air of propaganda pervading her own writings.  She like many scientists thinks RaTG13 bat coronavirus is a fabrication.   But when it comes to the point of saying Shi Zhengli fabricated the RaTG13 genome, Dr. Yan states,
 

‘Evidence herein clearly indicates that the novel coronaviruses recently published by the CCP controlled laboratories are all fraudulent and do not exist in nature.

 
She issues that glittering generality, ‘the CCP made me do it’. When Dr. Yan states the pangolin coronavirus is a fabrication, she states

 
‘we believe both groups of pangolin coronaviruses represented by MP789 and P4L, respectively, are non-natural and fabricated’

 
She never names Ping Liu at the Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization as creating the fabrication, but intimates it was ‘CCP instigated’.
 
 
By Dr. Yan shifting attention away from Zhengli and RaTG13, and from Ping Liu and pangolan, and shifting attention to ‘CCP controlled laboratories’, and ZC45 coronavirus as the possible background, is this not propaganda, misdirecting one’s attention and logical focus?  Dr. Yan stated,

“A key component of the creation, the template virus ZC45/ZXC21, is owned by military research laboratories.  Importantly, as revealed here, multiple research laboratories and institutions have engaged in the fabrication and cover-up…… It is clear that this was an operation orchestrated by the CCP government”—Yan Report #2

 
“Given the CCP’s role here, it is of paramount importance that the CCP is held accountable for its actions”.—–Yan Report #2

 
What’s clear and distinct to Dr. Yan, is not clear and distinct to me (I am not a scientist, but I think logically).  Dr. Yan never directly accuses Zhengli of fraud, or being the creator of Covid-19, she shifts the blame and accuses the CCP instead. Is this is propaganda and intentional  misdirection? 
 
 
ZC45 bat coronavirus is 87.6 percent nucleotide identity to Covid-19. And 75. 2  percent   S gene nucleotide identity to Covid-19,  according to Table 2 in the article ‘Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding’, by Guizhen Wu, Weijun Chen, Weifeng Shi, Wenjie Tan, and many others.   
And only 80 percent amino acid identity to Covid-19. 

 
ZC45 is a very poor candidate for Covid-19 backbone and Dr. Yan knows that. Does offering poor candidate ZC45 as Covid-19 backbone, and ZC45 being a Nanjing military bat coronavirus from 2017, evidence enough to indict the CCP for bioweapontry use, as Dr. Yan would have as do? Or, is it just Yan propaganda? 
 
 
Even after saying all of that, the fact that General Wei from Nanjing military command was placed in charge of WIV in early 2020, indicates that some Nanjing military personnel was probably involved at Covid-19 creation time. 

 
But a  Beijing CDC connection may be more evident, as stated in my other postings. 

 
If a bioattack occurs you would expect State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, AMMS, to be in the mix, where they create ‘lethal mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2’ using CRISPr.  You would expect NHC Key laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens, Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical to be in the mix.  But up to this point in time, only Wuhan Institute of Virology and a North Carolina laboratory that specializes in chimera coronaviruses, ………..
 
 
other postings– 
 
https://www.americaoutloud.com/organized-scientific-fraud-sars-cov-2-is-an-unrestricted-bioweapon/
 
https://www.americaoutloud.com/it-is-no-great-mystery-sars-cov-2-origin-is-the-wuhan-lab-3rd-yan-report/
 
https://scitechdaily.com/wuhan-lab-leak-theory-rare-genetic-sequence-doesnt-mean-the-covid-virus-was-engineered/     points to NIAID paper where they swap bat coronavirus RBDs