LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

March 28, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dr. McCullough was a guest on the Joe Rogan Experience in his “man-cave” studio for a 3-hour comprehensive interview. Joe Rogan is a legendary podcaster, comedian, and ultimate fighting championship interviewer and color commentator. After this penetrating interview on COVID-19 and the pandemic response, Rogan looked like he had gone 15 rounds in the ring with the scientific truth on COVID-19. His better understanding of what is happening worldwide led to revelations for his large audience worth listening to by everyone who has been touched by the crisis. Both Dr. McCullough and Rogan are COVID-19 survivors and there are messages and key points for all to take home.

McCullough/Rogan Video:
It Was All Premeditated To Promote COVID-19 Vaccines

SUBSCRIBE ON RUMBLE

The Full Episode of
Dr. Peter McCullough on the Joe Rogan Experience

 

AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK
AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK

America Out Loud is the premier news network with a diverse array of talk shows that inform and inspire. A daily resource for smart people.

  • Dr. Peter McCullough

    Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist managing the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine in Dallas, TX, USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection,” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has extensively commented on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill, America Out Loud, NewsMax, One America News, Victory Channel, NTD, and FOX NEWS Channel. Dr. McCullough has testified on pandemic response multiple times in the US Senate, Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Arizona Senate, Colorado General Assembly, New Hampshire Senate, Pennsylvania Senate, and South Carolina Senate. On December 7, 2022, Dr. McCullough co-moderated a Senate Panel and concluded that all COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market for excess mortality. Dr. McCullough has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, and press releases, and has been considered among the world's top experts on COVID-19.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carrie Silvina Espinoza Villanueva
Carrie Silvina Espinoza Villanueva
2 years ago

Dr. Peter A. McCollough is incredible! I agree on every point. I was diagnosed as immunocomprimised by Dr. Higgenbottem (CDC Specialist) of Scripps Torrey Pines Green Hospitol 18 years ago. He is deceased but the mention of his name always brings doctors in San Diego to respectful attention. Dr. Higgenbottem told me 18 years ago that I was to NEVER subject myself to any vaccine ever again. I have not had any vaccine for 18 years until Covid. I am not an antivacciner. However my employer Palomar College sent out an email telling me I would be terminated if I didnt get the vaccine. At that time there was no doctors letter option. I had Covid twice. The first time a test had not been developed. Palomar has a very large cohort of International students. In Dec 2019 our main office was packed with Chinese students and their families visiting from China. I’m very susceptible to SARS viruses. I noticed many of the students and family members had a characteristic barking cough that indicates enflamed bronchi. I asked the building super to monitor the headcount and I was poo poo-ed. By mid Dec I had a raging 103 fever, diarrhea, a cough so severe I would cough till I vomited. I had never had diarrhea during a upper respiratory infection. I sent an email in Mar 2020 to the CDC warning of a “new” SARS virus. I also notified OSHA and the Ca. Community College Board. of the lack of microbial Stewardship. Over 87% of the staff and faculty in the Admissions building reported to me they were so sick during the 2019 Holidays that they and their sick families didnt celebrate Christmas or New Years. Faculty and staff later came to me concerned that they had indeed had Covid. Two people were hospitalized. I came close , but I’m more confident in my own self care than in being exposed to super bacteria in a hospital. Fast forward to Jan 2021. I contracted Covid and the house was quarantined. I am a workaholic, 13 hours a day. I couldnt seem to pull out of the physical problems I developed. I continued to work from home. My chronic issues seemed unrelated to Covid. Heart arrhythmia, swelling feet, chronic headaches, intermittent diarrhea, bilateral carpel tunnel, left eye pain , left ear pain, lung crackles and my back pain was worse than ever. I was working from home. Not fatigue but exhaustion. Suddenly I was ordered to get the Covid vaccine or lose my 20 year State job. I had both Phizer vaccines in May in my left arm. The 1st shot put me down 3 days. The second shot sealed my fate. I went into a viral inflammatory tsunami meltdown. I developed a left torso pain that spread to my entire left ribcage. For the first time in my life I went to the hospitol. Sept 14 2021. I had a viral tumor removed from my left eye. I have been off work with severe pain since. The hospitol did CT scans checking for a heart attack. I have an enlarged heart and a aorta aneurysm. I have had my kidneys , spleen, heart, eye, ear, spleen examined. The CT scans showed tumors in my left breast, liver , pancreas ect. I had a breast exam in April and like every year I’ve been clean. I just had a biopsy and now their saying I have developed breast cancer in record time. My doctor says he has never seen yearly breast exams clean suddenly change so fast. I’m now of the belief the gross inflammation from the vaccine brought my body to a viral inflammation hell. I’m doing research and I’m pumping the breaks on the insistent pressure to have immediate breast surgery. I told my lovely doctors in my Covid Longhaulers Team that this inflammation hell needs special consideration. I want deliberate thought, I will not submit my body to any more trauma without care. I explained that I felt that Cobid was similar to HIV and that I needed monocoloidal treatment. They are listening.

Jonathan Liles
Jonathan Liles
2 years ago

You have to look at the entire situation based on “Limits to Growth.” Starting in the 1940’s MIT was modeling complex system dynamics. This modeling type came to the conclusion that the growth model would not last 100 years (2040-2050). The modeling was used to write a report to the Club of Rome for it’s Predicament of Humankind Project in 1972. At the same time Nixon took the US off the gold standard and essentially started to “managed decline” via inflation and seemingly random crises. Nixon & Kissinger also met with Mao and told him that they both understood situation in the world had changed and that they understood that Mao’s revolution was not the same as the other socialist revolutions and that Mao had used “thought reform” (brainwashing) at a country wide level. This is documented by Robert Lifton in his book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China. An LtG follow up report was done by Gaya Herrington and released Nov. 3rd, 2020 (just before US election) and it essentially backed up the assertion that we only have two to three decades to change the economy of the globe away from a growth model and towards a sustainable model. This fact, which has been left out of much of the discourse regarding the UN’s MDGs then SDGs in the 2030 Agenda, are all based on LtG. People are looking at the pandemic, Critical Race Theory, Climate Change, DEI, etc. as all separate events. They’re not separate events.

Now that I’ve gotten all of that out of the way I think it might make more sense regarding what sort of goals there might be by building an infrastructure that has at its core detainment, injections, and thought reform. They’re not concerned about just global pandemics, they’re creating the infrastructure for a worst case scenario where we do not meet the goals needed for society to not collapse.

Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism by Robert Lifton:
https://ia902504.us.archive.org/8/items/ThoughtReformAndThePsychologyOfTotalism/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychology_of_Totalism.pdf

Limits to Growth 1972:
https://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scan-version.pdf

Limits to Growth 2020:
https://advisory.kpmg.us/content/dam/advisory/en/pdfs/2021/yale-publication.pdf

UN 2030 Agenda:
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Collegium International (Doctrine of Global Governance):
https://www.collegium-international.org/?lang=en

Thomas G
Thomas G
2 years ago

How do I find a doctor who treats covid before hospital admission? Eg monoclonal, iveemectin. Hydroxycloroquin, vitamin d. Etc.

Julius
Julius
Reply to  Thomas G
2 years ago

FLCCC Alliance-affiliated doctors

p. gutierrez
p. gutierrez
2 years ago

The vaccine of choice for any coronavirus pandemic was Remdesivir. Ralph Baric and Gilead tested GS-5374/Remdesivir against coronaviruses in 2017 and stated, 

“Here we show that a nucleotide prodrug GS-5734 (Remdesivir), currently in clinical development for treatment of Ebola virus disease, can inhibit SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV replication in multiple in vitro systems including primary human airway epithelial cell cultures with submicromolar IC50 values.”—–in the article  ‘Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses’, by Timothy Sheahan, Ralph Baric, Vineet Menachery, Joy Feng (Gilead), Iva Trantcheva (Gilead), and many others, Sci Transl Med. 2017 June 28; 9(396):
 

The Atlanta CDC and NIAID had already worked with Gilead for many years to develop Remdesivir.
 

“The research outlined below demonstrates how the ​ U.S. Army, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) either conducted or funded much of the preclinical and clinical development of remdesivir (formerly referred to as GS-5734). Preclinical Research
A collaboration between Gilead and U.S. scientists on ​ remdesivir began after the Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa in 2014, which ​ accelerated efforts to identify and develop antiviral drugs to combat the disease.
Scientists with the CDC screened possible candidates to treat the Ebola virus from a library (owned by Gilead) of ​ approximately 1,000 compounds “harnessed from over 2 decades of research across multiple antiviral programs. They identified a precursor to GS-5734, which Gilead scientists and researchers with the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) refined and further developed.” —–in the article, ‘Role of the Federal Government in the Development of Remdesivir’, KEI Briefing Note 2020:1. Kathryn Ardizzone. March 20, 2020. Updated May 28, 2020, https://www.keionline.org/wp-content/uploads/KEI-Briefing-Note-2020_1GS-5734-Remdesivir.pdf
 

When Remdesivir proved not to be the best therapeutic for Covid-19, the NIAID and Ralph Baric world extensively with Moderna in preclinical trials to develop its vaccine. Regarding Moderna vaccine clinical trial against mice 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
“Immunogenicity was assessed in six-week-old female BALB/cJ,
C57BL/6J and B6C3F1/J mice by two intramuscular immunizations
with 0.01, 0.1 or 1 μg mRNA-1273, separated by a 3-week interval.
mRNA-1273 induced dose-dependent specific S-binding antibod –
ies after prime and boost in all mouse strains”, in the article, ‘SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (moderna) design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2622-0.pdf  ,Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, Moderna Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA., Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and many others, These authors contributed equally: Kizzmekia Corbett, Darin Edwards, Sarah Leist.
                                                                                                                                             
Other Moderna preclinical trial was against Rhesus macaques, with the same government, private industry, university virologists working together. ‘Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates’, at   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449230/pdf/NEJMoa2024671.pdf 
 
 
Pfizer vaccine preclinical trials may or may not have had much NIAID assistance, but Pfizer and Moderna did use the ‘2P’ technology developed by the NIAID in 2017, in creating the spike gene used in their vaccines.

 
“vaccine candidate BNT162b2, a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA (modRNA) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, modified
by two proline mutations to lock it in the prefusion conformation.”
‘Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine’, by
Fernando Polack, Stephen Thomas, and many others,  Research and Development, Pfizer, Pearl River , Pfizer, Hurley, United Kingdom, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore,  BioNTech, and many others.  
 

Moderna likewise used the NIAID ‘2P’ technology approach creating its vaccine.

 
 
“The mRNA-1273 vaccine candidate, manufactured by Moderna, encodes the S-2P antigen, consisting of the SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein with a trans-membrane anchor and an intact S1–S2 cleavage site. S-2P is stabilized in its prefusion conformation by two consecutive proline substitutions at amino acid positions 986 and 987, at the top of the central helix in the S2 subunit.”, in the article, ‘An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report’, by Lisa Jackson, Evan Anderson, and others,   https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483?articleTools=true,   
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Moderna, Cambridge, MA, and many others. 
 
 
 
 
Without this NIAID 2017 ‘2P’ knowledge, neither the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines would have taken the shape that they  have taken. From the 2017 NIAID research, we read regarding MERS and ‘2P’, 

“in this study, we rationally designed a general strategy to retain betacoronavirus S proteins in the prefusion conformation. The prefusion-stabilized MERS-CoV S protein (MERS S-2P) retained high-affinity binding…..two consecutive proline substitutions at residues V1060 and L1061 (hereafter referred to as “2P”) resulted in a >50-fold improvement in yield….Thus, the proline-based strategy should be advantageous for the development of vaccine candidates against emerging coronaviruses for which structures have not yet been determined.”, in the article ‘Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen’, by Jesper Pallesena, Kizzmekia Corbettc, Daniel Wrapp, Mark Denison, Barney Graham, and many others, Virology Core, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, and many others,        https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/114/35/E7348.full.pdf  
 
 

The same names at the NIAID in 2017 which help create the ‘2P’ technology, helped perfect the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, and probably hold that Covid-19 originated in nature, but we never see their opinions on the matter in scientific articles. 
 
 
One last quick thought, in December 2021, University Texas Galvestion released the results of their recent study in the article, ‘QTQTN motif upstream of the furin-cleavage site plays key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis’, by Michelle  Vu, Kumari Lokugamage, and others. QTQT amino acids are close to the furin cleavage site for Covid-19, and both are being lost by Covid-19, in some laboratory cell passage experiments. Article is well worth reading.  
                                                                                                                                            
 
QTQT aa sequence is only in Covid-19, RaTG13, and Malaysian pangolin 2019 that died in Guangdong province. I ask in posting elsewhere, was CRISPr used to insert the sequence, since selective pressure in that part of Spike gene of Covid-19 differs from the selective pressure surrounding the Covid-19 RBD. Neither the 2019 pangolan nor RaTG13 have the RRAR cleavage site, which is very close to the QTQT aa. But Covid-19 does have the RRAR and the QTQT. Stay involved with the Covid-19 origin research.

                                                 
Other postings — https://americaoutloud.news/strengthening-the-biological-weapons-convention;

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link