Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Pandora | iHeartRadio | Podcast Index | Email | TuneIn | RSS
It’s interesting to watch the response to my work. Over time the people I fight with have tried to buy me, threaten me, smear me, and do anything else they could to shut me up, to no avail. I’m not for sale, I have no fear of these pieces of human excrement, and I don’t care what they say about me or claim to know about me. At the end of the day, the people behind COVID and the vaccines have killed 10s of millions; I’ve killed zero.
Because I’ve stayed true to the fight and have no pride, every hit piece they do on me just ends up giving me more followers and supporters. As a result, the plan has become to censor me and never mention my work. That is not going well because of this show, my Rumble Channel (@RenzLaw), Twitter opening up (@RenzTom), and other social media competitors like Truth Social (@TomRenz). This means we are succeeding in getting the truth out, and the best the other side can do is try to distract and double down on censoring.
While the censorship is a consistent, ongoing issue (see my Twitter posts grumbling about it), the response to my sharing the truth about the plan to poison the food supply with gene-altering meds (like mRNA) has been to try and distract. We constantly hear about cows from the Cattlemen’s Association. Fortunately, the Cattlemen are not very adept at their work and change their story more often than most people change their underwear. Unfortunately, some people do focus on mRNA in beef, and that is really not the issue.
The real issue is the use of these untested and unsafe medical interventions in our food supply. Are they transmitting to people, and are they altering human DNA? We simply do not know, and I, frankly, do not trust the same FDA that told me the #DiedSuddenly COVID jabs were safe and effective, to be honest about the food supply.
That’s why bills like Missouri HB1169 are so important. They don’t ban anything, but they do insist on disclosure and informed consent for products that can alter your genes.
If the food is truly not a risk for doing this, then why are the Cattlemen, Farm Bureaus, Chambers of Commerce, and others opposed to this?
While I have yet to get a legitimate answer – they typically just say the bill was poorly written and would cause farmers problems but won’t give any real specifics – I am happy to say I have a solution. The bill sponsor (Holly Jones) has worked to develop some substitute language that will ensure the concerns of the Republicans opposing the bill are handled. The new language does that very clearly, and I’ll be posting it everywhere as soon as possible. This means that unless these guys are against informed consent, there is no longer any reason for them to oppose the bill. If they do – that simply means they aren’t opposing it for any reason other than they are owned by the lobbyists.
I’m looking forward to seeing who is honest and who isn’t. BTW – I plan to publicly apologize to any of the committee members I called RINOs if it turns out I was wrong… but I’m doubling down otherwise.
The Tom Renz Show on America Out Loud Talk Radio can be heard weekdays at 6 pm ET. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. All episodes can be heard on-demand on podcast networks worldwide. Find out more and listen to previous podcast episodes here. Visit Tom Renz’s website: http://Tomrenz.com, and his substack: http://Tomrenz.substack.com.
Please support us at www.TomRenz.com and if you’ve been injured by these jabs and need disability, please go to www.Renz-Law.com & let us know or call 1-877-736-9773. If you are interested in gold or silver, go to www.bh-pm.com and tell them Renz sent you. If you give to our GiveSendGo, subscribe to this SubStack, or buy from our sponsors and tell them Renz sent you, then you are helping to fund our fight against tyranny.
Sources and much, much more:
https://twitter.com/RenzTom/status/1645938831852548096?s=20
Megan Rapinoe signs petition against protecting women’s sports – twitchy.com
Biden Bans 53% of Americans From Buying Cars | Frontpage Mag
Chart of the Day: Americans Increasingly Are Looking for a National Divorce | Right Wire Report
America Out Loud is the premier news network with a diverse array of talk shows that inform and inspire. A daily resource for smart people.
They don’t like the bill because it will stifle their sales. They don’t mind the vaccine because they are probably being paid to give it to the livestock. They want a win win. This is pure speculation on my part. Call it a gut feeling.
I have worked for biotech companies, I don’t recognize the FDA anymore. It is the revolving door between oversite and management of these companies.. Like the Bob Dylan song goes, “Who do you serve?”
These folks need to make sure that their definitions don’t just include “gene-altering” but also “gene-interacting” in any way. This is important, in order to include not only mRNA vaccines and the like (which do change genes, despite assurances that they would not, but that is another story), but which also include future “gene-blocking” agents, and other medical legalisms which will undoubtedly be used to evade public scrutiny.
As an aside, I’m frankly surprised that there has been little or no legal action against the Pfizer vaccines, based on the papers by the De Marinis and Mehedi groups, which show both gene-altering and nuclear penetration by the vaccines – two smoking guns which prove that prior assurances that the mRNA vaccines would not affect people’s genetics were a LIE.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1073789/full
Good, agree but Tom, should not have to search for this information. You should be linking to it or at least summarizing the bill in the story. https://house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills231/hlrbillspdf/2467H.01I.pdf
I am sure that a lot of major beef processors are objecting as they already have contracts with McDonalds, Burger King, and the like to sell them cheap meat products. The only way they can meet their commitments is to eliminate Mother Nature from the process as much as possible.
These same farmer groups, like 35 total IIRC, opposed Christie Noems bill to ban china buying property in South Dakota and have come out against the same anywhere it’s been proposed. It’s all about the export market for them they could care less about US consumers they are beholden to china now just like nearly every one it seems. Farmers payed for this through mandatory check off dollars when they sold their crops. I think the nations farmers need to decide whose side they are on. I already know the answer because they have their hand out waiting for money.
Join the revolution against big tech censorship the answer to 1984 is http://Social1776.com