LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

April 16, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

New medical research finds circulating spike proteins key problem.

The best way to fight evil propaganda from the government, the health care system, and the public health system are by paying attention to new medical research. There is always more to understand as medical research keeps unfolding.

First, to summarize the ugly reality, it is important to recognize what the great Dr. Peter McCullough has noted. Roughly 15% of vaccine recipients develop a health problem after taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Compared to decades of previous vaccines, that is a huge number that previously would have caused the government to take such a vaccine off the market.

The key question is, what can cause only some people who get the shot to suffer ill impacts? Some key factors include: the lot number of the vaccine that serves as a proxy for mRNA quantity or contaminants, susceptibility based, for example, on underlying medical conditions such as obesity, diabetes, cardiac problems, and other diseases, and even inherited blood clotting disorder. Of special importance is the high incidence of myocarditis in young people in good health, especially boys and men. This has been connected to unusually high numbers of sudden deaths, especially among athletes.

Now comes a newly published medical study of extreme importance. The title is Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, had 13 young boys and 3 girls hospitalized with myocarditis and available for study. The researchers found all the subjects had large quantities of free circulating Spike protein generated from the vaccines, while control subjects without myocarditis did not. That is a huge, important medical finding.

In other words, spike proteins do not stay at the injection site. They can become mobile throughout the body.

“Immunoprofiling of vaccinated adolescents and young adults revealed that the mRNA vaccine–induced immune responses did not differ between individuals who developed myocarditis and individuals who did not. However, free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.”

The researchers prospectively collected blood samples from 16 patients who were hospitalized with myocarditis after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and compared them to 45 healthy, vaccinated control subjects of the same age. They performed extensive antibody profiling, including tests for SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral responses and assessments for autoantibodies or antibodies against other viruses. They also analyzed T-cell responses and cytokine production in the blood samples. They found that the immune responses induced by the mRNA vaccine did not differ between the patients who developed myocarditis and the control subjects. However, they did find that the patients with myocarditis had higher levels of free, unbound spike protein in their blood, which could be a potential cause of myocarditis in these individuals.

The study looked at sixty-one adolescents and young adults between the ages of 12 and 21, including 16 individuals with vaccine-associated myocarditis, who provided blood samples for analysis. The majority of individuals with myocarditis were male, and symptoms typically occurred within the first week after vaccination. Most of these individuals developed myocarditis after the second vaccine dose, but some developed it after the first or third booster dose. All patients presented with chest pain and had elevated levels of cardiac troponin T and C-reactive protein.

The researchers compared the serological responses of the individuals with myocarditis to those of asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects and found no significant differences in anti-spike or anti-RBD immunoglobulin M, IgG, or IgA levels, or in the ability of the antibodies to engage Fc receptors or activate complement. They also found no significant levels of self-antibodies or strong antibody responses to common pathogens in the myocarditis group compared to the control group. The researchers concluded that all adolescents and young adults mounted a substantial immune response after vaccination, conferring protection against SARS-CoV-2, and that there was no indication that a specific antibody response is associated with myocarditis.

The group with myocarditis also had cytokine profiles similar to those seen in a condition called MIS-C (a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children), with elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-10, interferon-γ, and IL-1β, and lower IL-4 levels compared to the control group. Additionally, total leukocyte and neutrophil counts were significantly increased in the group with myocarditis, while platelet counts were decreased. These results suggest that postvaccine myocarditis is associated with normal adaptive and T-cell immunity but modest innate activation.

Here is the key point:

The spike protein they had in their bodies had evaded the apparently sufficient library of antibodies (from the vaccine or previous infection) that were supposed to neutralize it. Thus, it is possible that some persons do not make specific neutralizing antibodies after injection, and thus, the spike protein is able to circulate and damage the body, specifically the heart muscle and possibly other organs, including the brain. Other research has found that harmful impacts can happen many weeks or months after booster shots. Scars in the heart muscle could explain serious impacts and deaths.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helen coleman
helen coleman
1 year ago

I have read the article ‘Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis’, by Lael Yonker, Zoe Swank, David Walt, Yannic Bartsch, and others, from Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School. One highlight from the article is,

“adolescents who developed myocarditis had markedly higher levels of free full length
spike protein in their plasma (33.9±22.4 pg/mL), unbound by antibodies (Figure 4A), whereas asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects had no detectable free spike protein……ultrasensitive single-molecule array antigen assays were used to measure the vaccine-stimulated production of both the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its cleaved subunit, S1, in the blood after intramuscular vaccination…….In all 4 patients, anti-N IgG was undetectable, suggesting that natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 was unlikely a contributing factor. In contrast, anti-spike, anti-S1, and anti-RBD IgG, IgA, and IgM levels increased as expected after vaccination. Patients 1 through 3 developed myocarditis after the second vaccine dose; patient 4 developed myocarditis after the first dose. …. Thus, the spike antigen itself, which evades antibody recognition rather than invoking immune hyperactivation, may contribute to myocarditis in these individuals It is important to note that the majority of circulating S1 was bound by specific anti-S1 antibodies, indicating an appropriate immune response for targeting and clearing S1.”
 
Yonker and Bartsch argument is that since the IgG antigen for the Covid-19 N gene wasn’t detectable in the plasma sampled, the spike genes in the plasma sampled came from the vaccines, and not Covid-19 virons. Yonker and Bartsch  stated that the myocarditis victims had ‘free full length spike with no bondings (to antigens)’.  Why didn’t they do a full PCR sequencing of the spike in the plasma sampled, to determine if it was wild type spike, or vaccine related spike? Was 2P technology (proline proline added at 986 and 987) present  in the S2 subunit of the spikes, indicative of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines?  Why were they so quick to rule out N genes in the blood stream, which would be indicative of Covid-19 viron origin in the bloodstreams, and not vaccine?  Did they use cryo-electron microscope to size the spikes? In a prior study Yonker  and Walt cite a leaky gut as allowing vaccine spike to enter into the blood stream. 

“An intact, functional intestinal mucosal barrier should prevent the passage of large antigens from the gut lumen into the bloodstream, including viral antigens derived from SARS-CoV-2 present in the GI tract (12). Zonulin belongs to a family of structurally and functionally related proteins that reversibly regulate intestinal permeability by modulating intercellular tight junctions (18–20).”, in the article, ‘Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is driven by zonulin-dependent loss of gut mucosal barrier’, by Lael Yonker, Tal Gilboa, David Walt, and others
 
Was wrong dosage amount given to the children? Was the dosage defective, so that mRNA spikes could not enter into and be transcribed by human cells? Yonkers show a general lack of concern for the nonhumoral results of the vaccines in the children, types of T-cells created in the children by the vaccines, except their  supplementary Figure 8S which is intended only for rocket scientists to decipher, and not for general public reading. Their inability to find Covid-19 N genes in the blood of the children, N antigenemia, has been written about by too many other good studies

(1) “nucleocapsid (N gene) is elevated in (blood) samples without evidence of anti-nucleocapsid (IgG) and anti-spike (IgG, IgM, and IgA) seroconversion”,—in the article, ‘Nucleocapsid antigenemia is a marker of acute 1 SARS-CoV-2 infection’, Hans Verkerke, Gregory Damhorst, and others

(2) Similarly in the 2020 article, ‘Ultra-Sensitive Serial Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens and Antibodies in Plasma to Understand Disease Progression in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Disease’ by Alana Ogata,  Adam Maley, David Walt, and others, found evidence of spike, subunit S1, and N gene in human plasma, probably entering the blood stream through tissue damage.    
“we present the first report of SARS-CoV-2 spike, S1, and N detection in plasma. The
presence of S1 and N in plasma suggests that fragments of virus are entering the bloodstream, potentially due to tissue damage. Although spike is undetectable in most
COVID-19 patients, possibly due to proteolytic cleavage, 6 patients showed high concentrations of spike in plasma. No evidence has been reported yet for full viral
particles in blood, though we cannot rule out this possibility”                                 

(3) ‘Highly Prevalent SARS-CoV-2 Antigenemia in COVID-19 Patients’ by Wenyan Zhang, Wei Liu, and others ‘SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NP) antigen, specific IgM/IgG antibodies, and RNA were
detected in sequential sera from three COVID-19 patients, and additional 153 COVID-19 patients by means of NP-antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, colloidal gold quick diagnosis, and real-time RT-PCR, respectively.’

Yonker, Bartsch and Walt new article should read in the context of these articles that found Covid-19 N gene in the bloodstream of myocarditis patients. Covid-19 N gene in the bloodstream, a sure sign of extreme Covid-19 according to scientists.
viremia – virus in the blood stream
antigen-emia —  antigen/vaccine in the blood stream

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link