LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

March 28, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The USFDA as well as the vaccine manufacturers excluded pregnant women and those of childbearing potential who could not guarantee contraception from the registrational trials of the COVID-19 vaccine. This was done to protect the safety of the mother and the baby from the unknown effects of the investigational vaccine. Regulatory practice always calls for the exclusion of groups not studied from receiving new products when they are released to the public.

In a gigantic break from this safe and reasonable practice, with no proof of benefit or evidence of safety, the CDC recommends that pregnant women volunteer for the vaccine. It is known that COVID-19 is in general mild and self-limiting in pregnant women, does not cause fetal malformations, and when presenting with severe symptoms, can be treated with drug therapy including hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, steroids, and aspirin.

The only vaccines allowed in pregnant women are biologically inactive:  influenza, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis. Thus, it is up to each woman to do her research on this very important decision in pregnancy or childbearing years. As of May 7, 2021, 275 miscarriages have been reported to the CDC in women who were needlessly vaccinated. Given the strict nature of reporting including penalties for false reports, it is estimated that only 1-10% of safety reports are logged by the CDC after vaccination. 

Thus, at this time, American women have probably lost >2000 babies to the COVID-19 vaccines and that number will continue to rise until either the vaccines are pulled from the market or pregnant women are excluded. This week’s report has an excerpt from Dr. McCullough and Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson Today May 8, 2021, and expert opinions from Drs. Malthouse, Stricker, and Gilbert, giving caution about the untested vaccine in pregnant women.

There is no more urgent message from The McCullough Report, under no circumstances should a pregnant woman feel forced to comply with CDC recommendations on vaccination with the investigational COVID-19 vaccine that has no proven benefit or guarantee of safety for the mother or the fetus. Please do your own research and carefully discuss this with your doctor(s).  

References:
 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html
 https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

– McCullough PA, Alexander PE, Armstrong R, Arvinte C, Bain AF, Bartlett RP, Berkowitz RL, Berry AC, Borody TJ, Brewer JH, Brufsky AM, Clarke T, Derwand R, Eck A, Eck J, Eisner RA, Fareed GC, Farella A, Fonseca SNS, Geyer CE Jr, Gonnering RS, Graves KE, Gross KBV, Hazan S, Held KS, Hight HT, Immanuel S, Jacobs MM, Ladapo JA, Lee LH, Littell J, Lozano I, Mangat HS, Marble B, McKinnon JE, Merritt LD, Orient JM, Oskoui R, Pompan DC, Procter BC, Prodromos C, Rajter JC, Rajter JJ, Ram CVS, Rios SS, Risch HA, Robb MJA, Rutherford M, Scholz M, Singleton MM, Tumlin JA, Tyson BM, Urso RG, Victory K, Vliet EL, Wax CM, Wolkoff AG, Wooll V, Zelenko V. Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 30;21(4):517-530. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264. PMID: 33387997.

AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK
AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK

America Out Loud is the premier news network with a diverse array of talk shows that inform and inspire. A daily resource for smart people.

  • Dr. Peter McCullough

    Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist managing the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine in Dallas, TX, USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection,” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has extensively commented on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill, America Out Loud, NewsMax, One America News, Victory Channel, NTD, and FOX NEWS Channel. Dr. McCullough has testified on pandemic response multiple times in the US Senate, Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Arizona Senate, Colorado General Assembly, New Hampshire Senate, Pennsylvania Senate, and South Carolina Senate. On December 7, 2022, Dr. McCullough co-moderated a Senate Panel and concluded that all COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market for excess mortality. Dr. McCullough has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, and press releases, and has been considered among the world's top experts on COVID-19.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lauren Ayers
Lauren Ayers
2 years ago

I appreciate Dr. McCullough’s courage in speaking up. In an interview with Mike Adams he said a New England Journal of Medicine article found an 80% loss of babies in pregnant women as a result of the woman receiving the vaccine. Does anyone know the URL for that article? I couldn’t find it using Google Scholar.

Jurai
Jurai
Reply to  Lauren Ayers
2 years ago

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

Below is an excerpt of an article examining the study:

Using several registries within government which track vaccine reactions looking for safety signals, the authors concluded that their “preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.”

The NEJM’s study authors claim that out of 827 people, only 104 spontaneous abortions were observed after Covid vaccination during their observation window of twenty weeks or less. Yet fine print underneath their attached study table reads, “A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester.” 

A public letter to the editor of the NEJM quickly pointed out a concerning error and sought a correction. The letter stated, “In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%)….given the importance of these findings we feel it important to report these rates accurately.”

In short, if 700 of the 827 people received their shot in the third trimester, why are they being included in the investigation window for spontaneous abortions during the first twenty weeks?

Source: https://thehighwire.com/editorial/the-issues-surrounding-an-experimental-covid-shot-during-pregnancy/

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link