September 28, 2021

September 28, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Is Private Property Private Anymore?

by | May 3, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What is ‘a taking’ under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution? A case recently argued before the Supreme Court asks when can a state grant access to private property against the owner’s will? This is not simply eminent domain but the power of the state to take control of private property. The opinion, in this case, will most likely be used as justification for both state and federal governments to deprive you of your property rights and give them to a politically favored group.

To understand the issues of this case, we need to recognize two facts. First, while a person is free to exercise their rights, that does not include the authority to infringe on the rights. Second, property is not simply land or goods; it is anything you own and have control over.

The exclusive right of possessing, enjoying, and disposing of a thing; ownership.

Property – Websters 1828 Dictionary

The question posed to the court was when a state grants an easement, A right of use over the property of another,” is that ‘a taking’ under the Fifth Amendment?

California law forces agricultural businesses to allow labor organizers onto their property three times a day for 120 days each year. The regulation provides no mechanism for compensation. Although the regulation takes an uncompensated easement, a divided panel below held that it does not affect a per se physical taking of private property because it does not allow 24 hours a day, 365 days a year” occupation.

Cedar Point Nursery & Fowler Packing Company v. Victoria Hassid – Petition for Write of Certiorari

The law in question is the California Code of Regulations, Title 8, § 20900(e):

Accordingly, the Board will consider the rights of employees under Labor Code Section 1152 to include the right of access by union organizers to the premises of an agricultural employer for the purpose of meeting and talking with employees and soliciting their support,

Cedar Point Nursery & Fowler Packing Company v. Victoria Hassid – Petition for Write of Certiorari

Not surprisingly, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals states that the granting of this easement is not ‘a taking’ since it does not allow full-time access for the union officials. This position is patently ridiculous. I want to ask the justices who concurred with this opinion how they would react if I were to take their car three times a day, 120 days of the year, without their permission. Would that not be considered theft? Then how can the State of California grant an easement without the owners permission and not consider that the taking of their property? This case is not a Fifth Amendment taking, but not for the reason the Ninth Circuit stated.

WATCH THE VIDEO ON RUMBLE

 

Takings Clause

This case is not a Fifth Amendment Takings Clause issue because the property wasnt taken for public use.

…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

U.S. Constitution, Amendment V

This California regulation does not take property for the use of the public.

Open for general entertainment; as a public house.

Open to common use; as a public road.

Public – Websters 1828 Dictionary

What California has done is worse than eminent domain. They are not taking property for public use; they have stolen the property of agricultural businesses for private use. They have granted private organizations, in this case, unions, access to private property without the owners permission. By any just legal system, the business owners should be able to charge union organizers who come on their property against their will with trespassing like anyone else.

But if this law isnt a violation of the Takings Clause, does that mean its Constitutional? Not even close. Sadly, for all of the lawyers involved in this case, they couldn’t see this regulation as an obvious violation of the Fifth Amendment.

Property Rights

Just before the Takings Clause in the Fifth Amendment is its Due Process Clause.

nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

U.S. Constitution, Amendment V

What California is doing is not taking property for public use. They are clearly depriving the business owners the exclusive right of enjoying and disposing of their property, and they are doing so without due process:

An established course for judicial proceedings or other governmental activities designed to safeguard the legal rights of the individual.

Due Process – The Free Legal Dictionary

Since this is being done by a state, it not only violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution but violates the Fourteenth as well.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV

What saddens me is that the plaintiffs, as well as all of the agricultural businesses in California, maybe denied justice, not because their cause is not just, but because their lawyers need a remedial reading class. It seems law schools are educating their students into imbecility, and the American people are paying the price. Even if there was a justifiable case of this law being ‘a taking’ under the Fifth Amendment, it would not compensate the businesses for their damage.

If this were ‘a taking,’ what would be just compensation? Would the owner be paid the market price of the land that these union organizers are occupying? Would it be prorated based on the amount of time the union occupied it? What about the lost time of its employees, who the business owner is paying for, that is being disrupted by the union? How would someone go about calculating that? And if this were ‘a taking,’ it would not be the union who would have to pay the business owners, but the people of California through their taxes. Meaning the people of California, including these business owners who are having their property stolen, would be paying for the right of private organizations to disrupt the businesses of others. And not just for past infringements, but future ones as well. If that isnt a twisted view of ‘a public taking,’ I dont know what is.

This would not be the first time courts have used governmentstaking power to steal private property from one person to give it to a private group. The Supreme Court did exactly the same thing in 2004 with the Kelo v. City of New London case. In that case, they found that the City of New London could use eminent domain to take property from Susette Kelo for a fraction of its fair market value in order to give it to the New London Development Corporation, a private nonprofit company that planned to sell the land to Pfizer, Inc. Since the court has previously shown itself more than wiling to play a twisted Robin Hood, stealing from one to give to another simply because the government more favors them, I am not sure what this court will do.

On the other hand, if the court would consider this not a takings case but a deprivation of property, not only would the plaintiffs be on firmer legal ground, but the remedies available to the court would be more just.

Since the case is against the Chair of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, there is no way for the court to grant compensation from the unions for the damages they have done; that will have to be paid by the taxpayers of the State of California. However, since Victoria Hassid, as the Chair of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, has violated the rights of the agricultural business owners of California under the color of law, she could not only face civil but criminal charges.

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person is an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

18 USC §242

Rather than simply have the people of California pay for the damages done under this odious and tyrannical regulation, I would like to see those who created and enforced it punished personally for their dereliction of duty and violation of their oaths of office. Until elected officials and bureaucrats are held personally accountable for their actions, there is no incentive for them to obey the laws and exercise only the just powers of the consent of the governed.

Sadly, as much as I would like to see the agricultural businesses of California freed from this regulation, this case does not give the court a judicially cognizable reason to do so. I hope that one day, not only the bureaucrats in California but the people who allow them to keep working are made to pay for the damage they have done to their citizens.

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Do Not Submit, Your Kids Will Thank You For It

Do Not Submit, Your Kids Will Thank You For It

We are heading full-speed towards an economic meltdown. A recession even. We have no budget for fiscal year 2022, and do not expect one to come anytime soon. The federal government is likely headed towards a shutdown here in the next three weeks. Have you tried shopping lately? Notice how the shelves are much less stocked than usual?

Hydrocarbon Energy is the ‘Gift That Keeps On Giving’

Hydrocarbon Energy is the ‘Gift That Keeps On Giving’

The Left has this idea of better times before hydrocarbon energy. It is a ridiculous and dangerous fantasy. The number one tool of a doctor in the civil war was a saw. The number one tool of a dentist at that time was a pair of pliers. Our view of nature is distorted because of the comfort afforded us by fossil fuels. If we could live the life of the typical person of 1800 for only a week, virtually all of us would want to get back to the here and now as soon as possible…

First, They Came for the Trump Supporters, and I Did Not Speak Out…

First, They Came for the Trump Supporters, and I Did Not Speak Out…

As wishing death on anyone who disagrees with you becomes the “new normal,” the next new normal is violence. I have seen media references to “rounding up” anti-vaxers, Trump supporters, and anti-illegal immigration activists. From rounding them up to eventually killing them is a slippery slope. Just study the history of Germany in the 1930s. At the bottom of the slippery slope, we are at Dachau…

My David and Goliath Moment Against the Oregon Medical Board

My David and Goliath Moment Against the Oregon Medical Board

I challenge every doctor and nurse, and all medical staff, to stand for truth, to defy the crookedness of rogue medical boards and hospital CEOs whose testimony is rottenness to their souls. You may recall that David slew the giant. In the end, my reputation means nothing. What counts most is integrity. “For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?”

Taking The Fight to the Employer or School – COVID Questions & Exemptions

Taking The Fight to the Employer or School – COVID Questions & Exemptions

What resources exist for employees who want to politely decline to use an experimental medical vaccine without risking the loss of their job? What questions can I demand my employer answer in order to satisfy the legal requirements for informed consent? With treatment options available, can my employer mandate that I get the vaccine or threaten me with termination?

The Retro WWII Uniform Just Doesn’t Fit General Milley

The Retro WWII Uniform Just Doesn’t Fit General Milley

The CJCS has historically been more of a behind-the-scenes counselor to the president on all matters involving the U.S. military. But that’s not the case with Mark Milley. Milley sees himself as something akin to a mythical knight in shining armor mounted on his trusty steed, sword in hand as he stands alone and firm in defense of the republic…

Morocco and the Death of its Muslim Brotherhood

Morocco and the Death of its Muslim Brotherhood

The peoples of Egypt, Tunisia, and now Morocco have declared publicly and unambiguously their contempt and refusal to have Sharia imposed upon them. They want a secular (even if military) rule than the clueless theocratic scum telling them how to live and die. If this spreads to more Muslim countries, the future will be rosier for most of them because every theocratic…

It is No Great Mystery, SARS-CoV-2 Origin is the Wuhan Lab – 3rd Yan Report

It is No Great Mystery, SARS-CoV-2 Origin is the Wuhan Lab – 3rd Yan Report

To mislead the world, CCP manipulated scientific campaigns (including scientists, doctors, top medical journals like Lancet or Nature) to push propaganda. I defined it as unrestricted scientific misinformation in the 3rd Yan Report. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is an Unrestricted Bioweapon developed by the CCP regime. We believe that this realization is crucial in protecting the global community from future bioweapon attacks…

It’s Time to Take the Attack to The Marxists

It’s Time to Take the Attack to The Marxists

Biden set up America for disaster. I can’t even suppose how many years of coming terrorist attacks, internal conflicts, and a return to tribalism for self-defense we’ll face. Make no mistake, we’re in for it and if we continue to trust the Democrat (Marxists) Party to do what’s right, instead of destroying them completely, then we must readjust the parameters of our thinking and prepare for the worst…

Header

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations.

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap