No Meaningful Consensus Among Climate Scientists

by | Mar 24, 2020 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The meme of “an overwhelming consensus” of scientists favoring one particular view on climate change is very popular, despite its implausibility. In fact, the claim of 97% agreement throughout the literature that mankind is responsible for warming in the past century readily falls apart upon inspection. Here’s why.
First, polls that ostensibly support the 97% consensus idea either ask the wrong people or ask the wrong question (or both – see here). Regardless, every reader should recognize that there are essentially no groups who agree on anything at such a high level. And, of course, even if they did, it would prove nothing about nature. The validity of scientific hypotheses are not decided by a show of hands. When Albert Einstein developed his Theory of Relativity, German scientists compiled a book titled Hundert Autoren gegen Einstein (A Hundred Authors Against Einstein), published in 1931. “Why 100?” Einstein asked. “If I were wrong, one would have been enough.”

That climate change is real and happening is clearly true; Climate is always changing. To say it is due to human activities begs the questions, “how much?” and “how do we know?”

Nearly all scientists understand that some of the past century’s warming trend is due to natural causes. The issue is how much is natural variability and how much is due to man-caused greenhouse gases and land uses such as agriculture and forestry?
Some scientists believe it is difficult or meaningless to ascribe a single temperature to the globe and then to attribute changes to that statistical abstraction to human causes. And whether climate change is dangerous or not is a subjective and political decision, not a scientific concept. Who is at risk? When? And how do the risks created by climate change compare to other risks we face every day?
At times, consensus may have a place in science, but only in contexts different than what occurs in climate science. It is typically achieved over an extended period of time by independent scientists following the conventions of the Scientific Method, in particular not neglecting the need to entertain competing hypothesis. Consensus emerges from open debate and tolerance of new theories and discoveries; it is not handed down by an authoritative international organization tasked with defending a single paradigm. 
Yet, this is exactly what the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been charged to do; find man’s role in climate change rather than find all the factors that control climate. In following this path, the IPCC has chosen to vilify scientists who disagree with the UN body’s effort. All of their reports are framed around providing support for the hypothesis of human-caused climate change. As a result, variables that logically would be expected to impact climate change have been neglected in these assessments. The list below includes a dozen such variables about which little is understood.
1- changes in seasonal solar irradiation
2- energy flows between the ocean and atmosphere
3- energy flows between the air and land
4- the balance between the Earth’s water, water vapor, and ice
5- the impact of clouds
6- understanding the planet’s ice
7- mass change among ice sheets, sea level, and glaciers
8- the ability to factor in hurricanes and tornadoes
9- the impact of vegetation on temperature
10- tectonic movement on the ocean floor
11- the differential rotation between the earth’s surface and the planet’s core
12- the solar system’s magnetic field and gravitational interaction
Instead of experimentation and open debate, today’s science maintains that consensus brought about by deliberation among experts determines what is true enough to direct trillion-dollar public policy decisions.

This is purely politics and not real science at all. But it tempts scientists to simply sign on to the IPCC’s latest reports and pursue the research topics and methodologies approved for funding by the controlling agencies.

The result in climate science is too little hypothesis testing and too much amassing of data that can be dredged from mathematical simulations and cherry-picked observations to support the ruling world-view. US President Dwight Eisenhower famously warned of such an outcome of government funding of scientific research in his 1961 farewell address.
“The free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity… The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded.” 
The discipline of climate science is still immature, leaving many basic questions yet unanswered. Instead of conforming to a bogus consensus, climate science which is outside the IPCC’s mandate to find mankind guilty, is full of new discoveries, new theories and lively debate.
For example, Geophysical Research Letters published a paper in 2018 by Hyinskata reporting that carbon dioxide emissions from a subglacial volcanic caldera in Iceland is ten times greater than previous estimates of the total emissions from all Icelandic sources. Further measurements of subglacial volcanoes worldwide would seem to be in order to determine if Iceland is unique or if estimates of the emissions from volcanic eruptions around the world have long been underestimated.
Also in 2018, John McLean published An Audit of the Creation and Content of the HadCRUT4 Temperature Dataset. HadCRUT4 is from Hadley Centre and the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. It is the most widely used temperature data set in the world.
McLean found a great deal of erroneous data as well as sparse data heavily relied upon and adjusted to exaggerate warming. Simply cleaning up this database, which is relied upon by the IPCC, should be a high priority.
The idea that ‘the science is settled’ is an absurdity contrary to the very spirit of scientific inquiry. This is especially the case in a field that is evolving as quickly as climate science. Disagreements among scientists about methodology and the validity of claims in field make it difficult for fair-minded laypeople to judge where the truth lies. This problem is magnified when politicians and too many scientists embrace claims of a scientific consensus so as to free them of the obligation to look at the science and reach an informed decision. We must call them on it every time the argument is presented.


Note: Portions of this article were excerpted from Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels, produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) published by The Heartland Institute, with permission of the editors Joseph Bast and Diane Bast. The author strongly recommends the book for a complete exposé of the fallacies behind the climate delusion.

Avatar

Dr. Jay Lehr is a Senior Policy Analyst with the International Climate Science Coalition and former Science Director of The Heartland Institute. He is an internationally renowned scientist, author, and speaker who has testified before Congress on dozens of occasions on environmental issues and consulted with nearly every agency of the national government and many foreign countries. After graduating from Princeton University at the age of 20 with a degree in Geological Engineering, he received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Arizona. He later became executive director of the National Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers.

Tom Harris is Executive Director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition, and a policy advisor to The Heartland Institute. He has 40 years experience as a mechanical engineer/project manager, science and technology communications professional, technical trainer, and S&T advisor to a former Opposition Senior Environment Critic in Canada’s Parliament.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and save 15%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave James
Dave James
2 years ago

Dr. Jay Lehr and Mr. Tom Harris assert the scientific consensus regarding climate change has been “..handed down by an authoritative international organization…” If fact, the scientific consensus is based on robust and compelling evidence of human-caused climate change. “Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.” (Source “Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming” NASA)
Mr Harris and Dr. Lehr assert that there is not such thing as global temperature, “…it is difficult or meaningless to ascribe a single temperature to the globe…” Their assertion is not supported by the scientific evidence. “The three most highly cited combined land temperature and SST data sets are NOAA’s MLOST, NASA’s GISTEMP, and the UK’s HadCRUT. A new merged land-ocean temperature data set is available from the Berkeley Earth group.” (Source “GLOBAL TEMPERATURE DATA SETS: OVERVIEW & COMPARISON TABLE” NCAR UCAR Climate Date Guide)
Dr. Lehr’s and Mr. Harris contend climate scientist ignores their list of 12 variables but they are mistaken. For example: The impact of solar irradiance on climate is well understood by scientists. “The Sun provides the primary source of energy driving Earth’s climate system, but its variations have played very little role in the climate changes observed in recent decades. Direct satellite measurements since the late 1970s show no net increase in the Sun’s output, while at the same time global surface temperatures have increased.” (Source “Climate Change: Evidence & Causes” An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences)
Mr. Harris’ and Dr. Lehr’s opinion piece consists of excerpts from the Heartland Institute’s “Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels” report. Acting as PR agents for the Heartland Institute is nothing new for Dr. Lehr and Mr. Harris. Their opinion piece titled, “Climate Realists To Debate Empty Chairs In Times Square Event” was basically an press release from the Heartland Institute promoting one of their up-comming events. (Source “Climate Realists To Debate Empty Chairs In Times Square Event” By Dr. Jay Lehr & Tom Harris, Sep 18, 2019, America Out Loud)
To their credit Dr. Lehr and Mr. Harris disclose the close connection to the Heartland Institute in their by-line. (If Dr. Lehr wished to be fully transparent, then he would describe his on going relationship with the Heartland Institute as well as his former relationship.)

Tom Harris
2 years ago

Great to see the ‘Dave James’ taking so much time trying to refute us. As my WWII Lancaster bomber pilot friend said, “If we returned from bombing raids over Germany and were not shot up badly, we knew we were not over the target. No one wastes ammunition if you are bombing a cow pasture.”
‘Dave James’ clearly recognizes we are right over the target, the shaky science underpinning the entire climate scare.

Dave James
Dave James
Reply to  Tom Harris
2 years ago

It does not take much time to see the flaws in his and Dr. Lehr’s opinion pieces. Mr. Harris disputes none of my comments. Mr. Harris asserts that I recognize he and Dr. Lehr are “right over the target.” However, as my posts show Dr. Lehr’s and Mr. Harris’ opinion piece is false and misleading.
In the marketplace of ideas, weak arguments based on unsupported assertions and falsehoods can only succeed if they are not counter by strong arguments based on facts and evidence.
Mr. Harris rejects the scientific evidence of human-caused climate change and embraces false conspiracy theories. For example: Mr. Harris and Dr. Lehr blame Al Gore for “the dangerous mythology of dangerous manmade global warming.” (Source “HOW AL GORE BUILT THE GLOBAL WARMING FRAUD” Oct 19, 2018, The Heartland Institute)
However, Mr. Harris also claims “man-made carbon dioxide causing global warming” was a “myth” created by Maurice Strong. (Source “$312 Billion: Green Energy Makes Ontario the Most Debt-Ridden Province on Earth” by Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris, Jun 18, 2018, PJ Media)

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Saving Lost Souls; The Story of Turhan Tirana

Saving Lost Souls; The Story of Turhan Tirana

Turhan Tirana, now 86 years old, has been guided by the confidence he learned at the General Seminary where he studied and the degree he earned confirming it. He believes he is as qualified as anyone to be doing this new work and says he is enriched beyond his prior imagination. As a result, some 600 students have benefitted in varying ways from his teachings…

Jan. 6 Theater Showcases Violently Political Anti-Trump Agenda

Jan. 6 Theater Showcases Violently Political Anti-Trump Agenda

Cheney quoted Trump tweeting: “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously and viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly and unfairly treated for so long.” Cheney conveniently omitted Trump’s final sentences where he tweeted to protestors to “Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

The “Presidential Emergency Action Documents” Threaten America’s Future

The “Presidential Emergency Action Documents” Threaten America’s Future

America stands on the precipice. Multiple presidential administrations have set in place rules and orders to effectively take over and rule this country. They did this behind closed doors, not even letting Congress know what their plans are. All it would take is the right person and the right conditions, for someone in the office of President to declare a national emergency and activate these despotic powers…

Quo Vadis America?

Quo Vadis America?

For the first time in 150 years, the Democrats lost this seat in Texas to Republicans. For the first time ever, a Mexican-born American has been elected to Congress. Rep.-Elect Mayra Flores (R-TX) argued Democrats have “walked away from the Hispanic community. They’ve gone so far left, and they don’t represent our values.”

Rescue Cash—Prevent Digital Slavery

Rescue Cash—Prevent Digital Slavery

By resisting these efforts to digitalize our money, we are taking a stand against the stranglehold that the globalists are continuing to tighten around our necks. When enough of us are using cash for most of our expenditures, we will have created a barrier to the most extreme financial takeover of our personal lives. Banks around the world are moving toward digital cash. The fact that China has already implemented digital currency is a grave warning for the future…

Rising Inflation, Supply Chain Disruptions, Workforce Shortages: The US Needs Less Red Tape, Not More

Rising Inflation, Supply Chain Disruptions, Workforce Shortages: The US Needs Less Red Tape, Not More

The “left” and radical environmentalists are essentially widening these considerations to embrace the wrong-headed idea that any and all increases in greenhouse gas emissions run counter to the “imperative” of achieving “net-zero” emissions. President Biden and his puppet masters have now placed the “climate consideration” into the Law of The Land…

Governments Willfully Blind – World Council for Health Calls for Global Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines

Governments Willfully Blind – World Council for Health Calls for Global Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines

No government agency has done a safety review of their mass vaccination program. After a series of analyses and statements from alarmed physicians and public health groups, the World Council for Health has stepped up and called for a global recall of all COVID-19 vaccines. With >3.5 million injuries and >40,000 deaths, which are believed to be a gross underestimate, the toll taken on…

Thought Leaders on the Biopharmaceutical Complex and Pandemic Response

Thought Leaders on the Biopharmaceutical Complex and Pandemic Response

America Out Loud PULSE with Dr. Peter McCullough – We cover the biopharmaceutical complex working as a vaccine syndicate to capitalize on the “business opportunity” of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and how the same mindset is being applied to the rare and much less transmissible illness of monkeypox. We will give an update on monkeypox cases in the US and finish tackling the most…

Alarming New Data Confirms COVID Vaccine Link to Fatal Brain Disorder

Alarming New Data Confirms COVID Vaccine Link to Fatal Brain Disorder

The disease is incurable as once one prion becomes infected, it will continue to propagate to other prions with no treatment capable of stopping its progress. Here is the big news. A peer-reviewed study in Turkey and the French preprint have identified sudden CJD cases appearing after getting the Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines, suggesting links between getting vaccinated and being infected…

Novavax Approval, CDC Trust, Vaccine Uptake and Q & A 27

Novavax Approval, CDC Trust, Vaccine Uptake and Q & A 27

America Out Loud PULSE with Dr. Peter McCullough and Malcolm Out Loud – For a pregnant woman, what adjustments need to be made to your early treatment protocol? Can the Provolone Iodine solution for nasal wash, once mixed, be kept for a few days, or should it be mixed up daily? On the show today, we’ll discuss the latest with Novavax, regaining lost trust with the CDC, and vaccine uptake, and we’ll answer your questions…

Using the Israeli Model and Common Sense to Stop Mass School Shootings

Using the Israeli Model and Common Sense to Stop Mass School Shootings

Why would a powerful organized group sacrifice the lives of children by stopping methods to keep the children safe? As horrible as this is to think about or say, school shootings are useful to Marxists in government, the teachers union, and the media. Useful in that each school shooting moves them closer and closer to their dream of disarming the American people…

America Out Loud 6 years

Celebrating 6 incredible years fighting to restore liberty and justice to our beloved America.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP
Healthycell

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link