The utility companies have thus far had little to say about the alarming cost projections to operate electric vehicles (EVs) or the increased rates that they will be required to charge their customers. It is not just the total amount of electricity required⏤but the...
Obama-Era Iran Appeasement Under Biden Undermines Trump Middle East Peace
An obvious goal behind Tehran’s backing of recent Palestinian Hamas rocket attacks against Tel Aviv population centers is to blow up last year’s Abraham Accords between Israel and several Arab states, which afford the best opportunity for Jewish-Arab peace in decades as a potential united front against Iran’s designs for regional dominance.
With the Trump administration that midwifed the Abraham Accords now succeeded by the same cast of characters that negotiated the toothless Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — more broadly known as the “Iran Nuclear Deal ” — Iran now sees a chance to advance that agenda.
Getting nothing for something
On the campaign trail, Joe Biden said he would rejoin JCPOA with other world powers on one key condition: “If Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the United States will rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations.”
On the other hand, Tehran has declared that it wants all of its demands met before returning to compliance.
Although Iran has said it won’t meet with the U.S. face-to-face until that happens, officials from the U.K., France, and Germany, acting as intermediaries, shuttled between two hotels in Vienna to initiate indirect discussions, including Russian and Chinese diplomats.
The Vienna talks reportedly addressed prospects for a quick return to JCPOA terms in return for lifting tough Trump administration sanctions on Iran. Not discussed was a big technical problem, namely that there is no way to return to the 2015 status quo because Iran has already enriched its uranium far too much since then.
According to Abbas Araghchi, one of Tehran’s leading nuclear negotiators, Iran will soon begin enriching some of its uranium stock to 60% purity, closer than ever before to a 90% threshold required for weapons-grade material.
So far, the Iranians are unwilling even to discuss their ballistic missile program or their support to proxy terrorist forces.
For a most recent example, Iran supplied Hamas militants with the designs and know-how to launch the rockets from Gaza into Tel Aviv. In some cases, these were cobbled together from common materials such as pipes, castor oil, and scavenged spent Israeli munitions.
Other more advanced Hamas rockets — called the Badr-3 — appear to be based on an Iranian model, known as the al-Qasim, which has been used by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq.
The Badr-3 is less sophisticated than rockets used by Iran’s own armed forces … the simple design is likely meant to allow groups like Hamas to build them.
So, what has JCPOA actually achieved?
Flashback to January 17, 2016, when the Obama-Biden administration secretly paid $400 million in extortion money to Tehran to secure the release of four American prisoners. Although the administration denied that the payment was ransom money, the cash was withheld in Geneva until the hostages were released from Tehran on a Swiss Air Force plane.
Altogether, the Obama-Biden administration paid Iran $1.7 billion, with second and third cargo aircraft shipments of wooden pallets stacked with Swiss francs, euros, and other currencies on January 22, 2016, and February 5, 2016.
The timing of those payments was notably suspicious. The first occurred on the same weekend that provisions that formally established the JCPOA with Iran were implemented on January 16, 2016. Once that happened, an Iranian cargo plane was allowed to bring the cash back home from a Geneva airport the next day, on January 17.
Incidentally, all this occurred soon after the humiliating spectacle of Iran’s release of 10 captured American sailors in the Persian Gulf on January 13, 2016. This was just hours before President Obama delivered his final State of the Union address.
Nevertheless, the Obama-Biden White House took a position that such rogue actions should have no effect upon the Iran nuclear pact, essentially arguing that America and other parties should simply lower expectations.
Although U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231 of the Iran pact “called upon” Iran not to build or test nuclear-capable missiles for eight years, Russia, which has veto power, has taken the position that the violations really don’t count. As their ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, explained, “A call is different from a ban because you cannot violate a call.”
Perhaps Russia’s generous leniency on the matter becomes more understandable given that they then negotiated a separate deal of their own … a more than $8 billion Iranian purchase of Russian fighter jets, other aircraft, and helicopters.
Together with the $1.7 billion in U.S. taxpayer extortion payments and at least $150 billion of sanction money released by the JCPOA, Tehran can now well afford those purchases.
Following that less-than-auspicious beginning, Tehran has been very busy putting these JCPOA gifts to bad uses.
In addition to supporting Palestinian Hamas, Lebanese Hezbollah, and other Middle East terrorist groups, Iran is also known to have been providing financing for North Korea’s nuclear military program in return for missile technology over at least the past two decades.
So, indeed, what has JCPOA achieved?
It has funded Middle East Mullah proxy exploits, allowed Tehran to continue to enrich uranium while restricting access to U.N. weapons inspectors, and has ignored Iran’s ballistic missile development program altogether.
Dangers of Desperate Diplomacy
As reported by the Associated Press, the Biden administration is considering a near wholesale rollback of “some of the most stringent Trump-era sanctions” imposed on Iran in a bid to get the Islamic Republic to return to compliance with JCPOA.
It’s hardly encouraging that, as described by State Department spokesman Ned Price, “Any return to the JCPOA would require sanctions relief, but we are considering removing only those sanctions that are inconsistent with the JCPOA.”
Given past JCPOA history, this gives them enormous latitude.
Nor is there any reason to expect a different outcome with any Biden administration JCPOA redux.
The U.S. negotiating team is being headed by Iran envoy Robert Malley who helped craft the original JCPOA as a member of Obama’s National Security Council. Malley is known as a great supporter of “diplomacy” over sanctions or military actions, and he has an obvious vested interest in restoring the original terms.
The Mullahs must already be madly mulling over future malevolent Middle East mayhem to monetize with more cargo pallets of American taxpayer money.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.
Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.