Strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention

by | Dec 4, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“We must simultaneously recognize that biological risks are growing. We face an increased threat of naturally occurring emerging diseases, as well as the potential for laboratory accidents and intentional misuse of life sciences and biotechnology.”

That is the statement by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on the U.S. Approach to Strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention.

Could Covid-19 be the fire drill for future BioWeapon attacks on the United States and the World?

That statement from Jake Sullivan goes on to say: “It is vital for us to work together – across the health, security, and development sectors – to enhance bio preparedness, biosafety, and biosecurity globally, and to reinforce the norm against the development and use of biological weapons.

The United States has made it clear that the weaponization of biological agents and toxins is unacceptable. Unfortunately, we are concerned that some nations still possess biological weapons programs, while other nations as well as nonstate actors seek to acquire them.”

We’ll discuss that biological threat to the U.S. and the world as well as talk on boycotting the Beijing Olympics with Dr. Li-Meng Yan on The Voice of a Nation. Dr. Li-Meng Yan is an independent virologist and whistleblower who is calling out the CCP to let everyone know the truth about COVID-19. She had accused Beijing of a massive coverup with the release of Coronavirus.

The Voice of a Nation can be heard weekdays at 6 PM ET, with an encore at 10 PM ET. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on AppleAndroid, or Alexa. You can email your questions to Talk@AmericaOutLoud.com.

Subscribe to
AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK

Or subscribe with your favorite app by using the address below

Malcolm Out Loud

Malcolm is the publisher of America Out Loud, host of ‘The Voice of a Nation’ and ‘Viewpoint This Sunday.’ He is the founder of America Out Loud Talk Radio and America Out Loud Podcast Network. Malcolm is a Speaker, Author & Founder of Brink Thinking. His previous career as the ‘big idea catalyst’ in marketing and creative director of television and radio advertising spanned over two decades.

Malcolm launched America Out Loud in April 2016 after an extensive career in broadcasting and business marketing. He has been a daily voice on the America Out Loud Talk Radio airwaves bringing some of the world's leading newsmakers and informed discussions on the issues confronting our world and nation. For over five years, Malcolm has been a driving force behind America Out Loud's growth, including bringing some of the most insightful programming and online journalism available today. America Out Loud provides an outlet for a vast and growing audience looking for news and analysis without the usual liberal media spin.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
p. gutierrez
p. gutierrez
1 month ago

Dr. Yan states in her second Yan report regarding investigating Covid-19 origin, 
                                                                                                                 
”It is imperative to investigate the scientists, laboratories, institutions,
and relevant collaborators responsible for the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and for the fabrications/cover-up…… it also needs to be investigated which ones of the scientists engaged in the promotion of the natural origin theory were purely misled by the scientific fraud and which ones were colluding with the CCP government.” –‘SARS-CoV-2 Is an Unrestricted Bioweapon:’ by Yan, page 29
 

Yan’s  first sentence is OK.    But her second sentence regarding scientists being misled, is somewhat shaky.  There is a big difference between being misled to commit a crime, and intentionally misleading those who are trying to conduct a criminal investigation.     Strengthening BWC is purely façade in these situations. 
 
Look at the facts, no theories involved here.     Bat coronavirus BtKy72 (from Kenya) is a fundamental part of Covid-19’s evolutionary history, as evidenced by all (not some) phylogenic trees created by scientists for Covid-19. There is evidence of BtKy72, in Covid-19’s genome (whether Covid-19 was laboratory made, or recombination event  in nature).   In May 2019, the Atlanta CDC tried to isolate and sequence  BtKy72 bat coronavirus for the first time, from their bat fecal swabs collected in Kenya in 2007.  The Atlanta CDC May 2019 article, ‘Complete Genome Sequence of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus from Kenyan Bats’, by Ying Tao and Suxiang Tong, stated   “Complete genome sequencing was not performed due to limited viral loads in fecal samples from the other four betacoronavirus-positive bats”.   The “limited viral loads”, was a reference to  Kenyan sister coronaviruses BtKy73, 4, 5 & 6 , whose RdRp gene sequences were filed with NCBI June 2016, but no complete genomes obtained at that time. All collected samples   (originally from 2007) lacked sufficient RNA for BtKy7* complete genome determination.  There was no misleading, by Tao and Tong in their article.  These remain as facts.  What percent of the genome for BtKy72 was ‘complete’ in May 2019, at the time of publication of their article, we don’t know.   No complete genome for BtKy72 in May 2019.      BtKy72 ‘complete’ genome virological sequences were filed with NCBI Feb 5, 2020.   No misleading information, this is a fact. One can ask how,  when,  and by whom was the BtKy72 genome completed, if the questioners have subpoenas.   Who was the BtKy72 genome given to in 2019? 
 
On January 13, 2020, Christian Drosten shows that he had full knowledge of BtKy72 coronavirus E and N genes, three weeks before they were published with NCBI, Feb. 5, 2020. See the Annex section in the article,  ’Diagnostic detection of Wuhan coronavirus 2019 by real-time RTPCR”.  See the E_Sarbeco_assay and N_Sarbeco_Oligos in the Annex section of the article, not in the middle section of the article.  
 
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/wuhan-virus-assay-v1991527e5122341d99287a1b17c111902.pdf’s January 13, 2020 article  ‘
 
 
January 17, 2020 version found at, 
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/laboratory-testing-of-2019-novel-coronavirus-(-2019-ncov)-in-suspected-human-cases-interim-guidance-17-january-2020  

 
This January 13 knowledge by Drosten is a fact. His having this ‘prior’ knowledge of BtKy72 is not in and of itself misleading, but may be part of a greater ………   Whoever gave Drosten that knowledge three weeks before BtKy72 sequences were filed with NCBI, so that Drosten could profit from his Covid-19 RT-PCR assay, may be ………..  Which may possibly implicate  a larger group of participants.   
 

The Beijing CDC had the ‘complete genome’ for BtKy72 at least by Jan 31, 2020, according to their article ‘Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding’, Figure 3 full genome phylogenic tree references BtKy72, and the accession number KY352407.1 was added by the Internet to the article, automatically after Feb 5 when it became available from NCBI.  The Jan 31, 2020 version of the article has been removed from the Internet,  and a Feb 22 version substituted.  I have already sent my Jan 31 copy to USRTK and as many senators and members of the House of Representatives as possible. Was the  removal of  the Jan 31 version of the article from the Internet, intended to mislead the American public?   Dr. Yan, who is being misled, and who is doing the misleading? 
 

No one seems astonished that two bat coronaviruses central to Covid-19 evolutionary history were in the same Atlanta CDC laboratory, five months before pandemic outbreak.  BM48-31 bat coronavirus sequences were used as primers (ie, sequence gap fillers) for the attempted sequencing of BtKy72. A sequencing that was never completed in May 2019,  after using RNA from five different bat samples. No Next Generation Sequencing possible?

Baric had prior Feb 5, 2020 knowledge of BtKY72 genome. See my other postings. Baric and Drosten both members of the Coronavirus Study Group.  
 
 
The scientists who promote the natural origin theory, Rambaut, Holmes, Anderson, Garry,  present a web of partial truths that they themselves have woven, with their eyes wide open, regarding the evolutionary history of Covid-19.  No CCP coercion involved in those partial truths.   Rambaut, Holmes, and others state in their 2020 article ‘Proximal Origin of SARS-Cov-2’ that the Covid-19 RBD and RBM (receptor binding motif) are not optimal, so Covid-19 impliedly no bioweapon. In the 2021 article, ‘Origins of Covid-19: A Critical Review’, they state the Covid-19 furin cleavage site is not optimal, so impliedly, Covid-19 is not a bioweapon. 
 
Covid-19 was created to be a non-optimal/non-lethal coronavirus, to test the world’s readiness for a true pandemic. A chimera,. hard to trace.  What may have started as an Peachtree-Rising Sun  plandemic, to test the world’s readiness for a true pandemic, went wrong because of amino acid miscalculations regarding the non-optimalness of Covid-19.    You see this miscalculation voiced throughout the apologetic toned articles of the ‘natural origin’ of Covid-19 scientists.  
 

Yet still a  highly coordinated plandemic that originated in October 2019, the exact time Event 201 pandemic exercise took place in NY, which George Gao of the Beijing CDC attended. Exact time of World Miltary Games in Wuhan, to exacerbate the spread.   A time which matches the ‘time to most recent ancestor’ (tmcra) for Covid-19, posited by many scientists as the time of pandemic origin,  when all virus alleles were still in the one originating source. 
 

There may have been ‘new intentional introductions’ of Covid-19 after pandemic origin, that ‘souped up Covid-19’ to the level of bioweapon, eg, D614G mutation, which many scientists look at with suspiciousness.   See   ‘Emerging phylogenetic structure of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic’,
Nicholas M. Fountain-Jones, Virus Evolution, 2020, Vol. 6, No. 1
    
 
One last comment on the possible origin of Covid-19.     Recently, Rambaut and Pekar research group attempted to disprove the theory that there are intermediate lineages, such as C/C and T/T, between the Covid-19 A and B basic lineages. In other words, just simple A and B basic lineages of Covid-19, ‘logical natural spillover’. But,  there are at least 77 ‘early’ homoplasies that don’t fit that logical point of view. 
                                                                            

“Of the 77 (early) mutations seen in C/C intermediate genomes, 32 (41.6%) would need to be homoplasies if these C/C intermediates actually existed. Similarly, 7 (58.3%) of the 12 mutations seen in T/T genomes would need to be homoplasies if the T/T intermediates truly existed. These apparent homoplasies can arise from issues regarding sample preparation, contamination, sequencing technology, and/or consensus calling approaches (3). …..These findings cast substantial doubt on the veracity of C/C or T/T intermediate genomes in early 2020. We suggest that these early C/C and T/T genomes are erroneous and should be excluded from phylogenetic analyses. ” —— the article ‘Evidence Against the Veracity of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes Intermediate between Lineages A and B’, by Pekar, Rambaut and others ,       https://virological.org/t/evidence-against-the-veracity-of-sars-cov-2-genomes-intermediate-between-lineages-a-and-b/754  
77  ‘early’  Covid-19 variants which are scientific facts, but should be considered to be  lies, errors, contamination according to Rambaut and Pekar. They are outside of the logical scope of  ‘natural spillover’.  77  ‘early’ eyewitness ‘intermediate’ genomes, that say, explain us!  77   ‘early’ intermediate genomes between, and at the same level, as the A and B Covid-19 basic lineages. The authors used the word ‘homoplasy’ at least three times?
                                                    
 
“A character state that evolved because of convergent evolution, but was not acquired through common evolutionary lineage is called homoplasy   
https://www.sciencedirect.com › medicine-and-dentistry
 

‘A homoplasy is a shared character between two or more animals that did not arise from a common ancestor. A homoplasy is the opposite of a homology, where a common ancestor provided the genes that gave rise to the trait in two or more animals.’ —-    https://biologydictionary.net/homoplasy/
    

Homoplasy, no common evolution, no common ancestor, another name for different/multiple Covid19 outbreak sources? ‘Natural spillover’, except for these 77 ‘early’  phylogenically intermediate, and phylogenically same level Covid-19 human genomes, which are obviously laboratory sequencing ’errors’, according to Pekar and Rambaut. A lot to sweep under the rug.    
                                                                                                         
 
Don’t look at those 77 ‘early’ sequencing errors, that got all 9,900 Covid-19 amino acids right, except one.  Wow!   Be good U.S. citizens, keep your heads stuck in the sand!  Those 77 homoplasies just mutated very quickly at plandemic origin, each showing just one sequencing error!  Shame on anyone who thinks otherwise.
                                                                       
 
Figure 2 of the Pekar article,  shows many of the genomes that are said to be in ‘error’, are at the same phylogenic level of the first Covid-19 mutation, T28144C , and do not contain that mutation. Multiple outbreak sources?    No natural spillover?   Who is misleading who?  Who is sweeping what under the rug?   
 
Li-Men Yan herself found BstEII restriction site at 1509 nt/503 aa (ggttacc) of Covid-19. EcoRI (gaatcc) at 1307 nucleotide of the Covid-19 Spike gene.      Figure 5a in her article,  “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”.
 

This is the exact location of the RBM (receptor binding motif) for Covid-19.  Based on the location of these restriction sites, that Covid-19 RBM , that binds to human ACE2, was most likely laboratory swapped into the Covid-19 genome, as Dr. Yan stated.    
 
 
We need prosecuting attorneys trained in virology sciences.    We need new Martha Clarks like in the OJ trial, who swiftly rose to the occasion to understand the science of DNA, and present scientific evidence to a jury.  We need federal investigators trained in the sciences, with the power of subpoena, independent of the NIH and NIAID, to go after rascal virologists who use their ‘superior’ scientific knowledge to place the rest of the world at risk. These types of investigations  should not be a matter for the Senate, nor the House of Representatives, nor the executive branch of government.   These virologists are in bed with federal agencies, each one scratching the other’s back, and until this bond is broken, we will be making new vaccines until doomsday.  
 
                                                                                                  
 May the Lord bless  ‘MalcolmOutLoud’, who allows me to continue to post comments on his website.   Your enemies regarding my postings and comments,  are my enemies.  We both seek the truth, and justice for those six million people who have died premature deaths, due to this  plandemic pandemic.       
other postings–  
 
https://www.americaoutloud.com/organized-scientific-fraud-sars-cov-2-is-an-unrestricted-bioweapon/
 
https://www.americaoutloud.com/it-is-no-great-mystery-sars-cov-2-origin-is-the-wuhan-lab-3rd-yan-report/
 
https://scitechdaily.com/wuhan-lab-leak-theory-rare-genetic-sequence-doesnt-mean-the-covid-virus-was-engineered/     points to NIAID paper where they swap RBDs
 
 

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Justice Will Be Restored

Justice Will Be Restored

In this issue of the McCullough Report, we will learn firsthand what the outcome of that approach was delivered to the faith community. We will also hear about the book by Robert F. Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci. We listen in on RFK’s speech in Milan, Italy, where he indicates as a seeker of justice, how in 22 months we have had a progressive…

The Root Cause Of COVID

The Root Cause Of COVID

Dr. Marz highlights a great COVID resolution for a high-risk patient of his and hear his sage advice when it comes to fasting, which is one of the most powerful natural medicines we can use as we do all we can, to help you tap into the healing power you already possess. Could it really be that the root cause for severe COVID cases is severe nutrient deficiency?

Electric Vehicles Will Never Dominate the Streets of America

Electric Vehicles Will Never Dominate the Streets of America

EVs are hugely expensive, have limited range, don’t work well in either hot or cold weather, and burn furiously when the battery ignites. There is not now, nor ever will there ever be, sufficient electric power for us to travel hither and yon with battery-powered vehicles. And EVs can never be produced in the numbers the government wants because…

Senator Ron Johnson, Dinesh D’Souza & Dr. Henry Ealy

Senator Ron Johnson, Dinesh D’Souza & Dr. Henry Ealy

We’ll talk about Joe Biden’s very bad week with Senator Ron Johnson. After his fiery Atlanta speech, Biden all but concedes defeat on voting election bills, Dinesh D’Souza will be here on that story, and much more. And Dr. Henry Ealy will join us to explain in more detail why the Supreme Court ruling on Biden’s forced vaccine mandates on private businesses is only a first step…

Gifts, Ministries, Activities

Gifts, Ministries, Activities

When you accept the truth, God wants to teach us and receive the gift God gives us, everything changes. Today we explore one of the most affirming and encouraging concepts the Bible teaches. It’s the path toward personal maturity and strengthening your church. Join Pastor Rick Stevens…

No Official Wants to Take Responsibility for Lockdowns

No Official Wants to Take Responsibility for Lockdowns

The man who considers himself the embodiment of science has made it clear that he’s not about to accept any responsibility for the carnage that he and other health officials unleashed in their Covid response. Fauci’s Nuremberg moment may yet be approaching but in the meantime, Joakim Book asks, is anyone going to accept responsibility for this?

Question Your Doctor Today, Plus Clay Clark Talks End Times

Question Your Doctor Today, Plus Clay Clark Talks End Times

Those who know the truth but are either being bribed, bullied, or blackmailed into spreading lies must be made to feel the pain for aiding the false narrative. As our readers and listeners are very well aware, the vaccines are neither safe nor effective. Why are they being pushed by trusted doctors onto children and others who take greater risks by getting jabbed than by avoiding them?

The Trojan Horse of Tyranny

The Trojan Horse of Tyranny

Now, almost two years after the start of the COVID scaredemic, more and more evidence of the lies, exaggerations, and manipulations are exposed, what are the American people going to do? Will we sit back and watch while tyrants ignore the Constitution and chip away at our rights faster and faster, or will we stand our ground and regain the liberty that is our birthright as Americans?

Blowing Up The Filibuster

Blowing Up The Filibuster

They are pushing for election reform under the guise of making elections fair. In actuality, a fair election is the last thing on their agenda. They want to move the elections from state control and make them federal. They want to allow non-citizens the right to vote, increase the number of days to vote, allow for mail-in ballots. In short, they are looking at a power grab…

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough #13

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough #13

Is the new Paxlovoid pill just a “reworked” ivermectin? What do you think of the data? Love the show. My question is, is it safe to take the provolone iodine with hypothyroid? There is a history of heart disease in my husband’s family so the thought of my boys getting any vac scares me, especially since I have 3 teenage sons. Will there be a ‘safe’ alternative? Will Novovax or Covax be safer?

The Federal Government v. The American People

The Federal Government v. The American People

From all sides generally ignoring the Constitution to the hyperbolic lies used to justify the mandates, this case shows the rot and corruption at the heart of our government. The question we should be asking is, can freedom and liberty in America survive when those in our government are so corrupted?

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

Header

Peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we arrive at that goal. - Martin Luther King Jr.

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link