Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our...
Syria: Chemical Attacks DECEPTION
On numerous occasions during the Syrian Civil War, Bashar al Assad was accused by his very wily opponents and ALL the utterly stupid Western Media in lock step, of using Chemical Weapons to slaughter civilians.
The question I repeatedly get asked on talk radio:
Why would a very astute politician as Bashar al Assad, fighting for his very survival, knowing full well that every action of his is under a microscope waiting to accuse him of exactly such an egregious action, use Chemical Weapons just to slaughter a few dozen CIVILIANS when a single bomb on any building would accomplish exactly the same result?
Gas warfare, even under Saddam Hussein against the Kurds – was used to murder THOUSANDS of civilians⏤not a handful. I concluded every time, based entirely on how the minds of Sharia compliant Muslims work, that in each case, it was Bashar’s opponents who murdered them to blame Assad because from their point of view, the loss of a few dozen innocent Muslims is redeemed by the condemnation and anger heaped upon Bashar.
By the way, even during WWII, although the allies knew for certain where and when the Germans were going to attack Coventry in England, they refrained from warning their civilians lest the Germans find out that the British had cracked the Enigma Code.
In every case of war, it is invariably the civilians who pay the price no matter what the cause or the case of the war may be.
The latest revelations by Wikileaks regarding this very subject prove my conclusions to have been 100% spot on.
Wikileaks has published shocking leaked internal documents from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in which they covered up a dissenting report that concluded chemical weapons were not used by Bashar al Assad in the Syrian city of Duoma in 2018.
They have shown, based on four batches of leaked documents from (OPCW), that Chemical Weapons Watchdog (WW) ordered deletion of ‘all traces’ of findings that the Syrian ‘Chemical Attack’ may have been staged.
In one of the leaked e-mail exchanges, from February 27-28, 2018, between members of the fact finding mission (FFM) deployed to Douma and senior officials of the OPCW, the watchdog’s chief of cabinet, Sebastien Braha, ordered the removal of “all traces” of a report by Ian Henderson.
“Please get this document out of DRA [Documents Registry Archive]… and please remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever in DRA, and remove it from the organization secure registry” the email reads.
Henderson had inspected the sites in Douma and two cylinders that were found on the site of the alleged attack.
In his report, he had concluded that the cylinders were more likely placed there — not dropped. His findings heavily indicated that the “attack” was staged. Minutes from an OPCW meeting with toxicologists specialized in chemical weapons: “the experts were conclusive in their statements, that there was no correlation between symptoms and chlorine exposure”
The drop also includes the minutes from an OPCW toxicology meeting with “three Toxicologists/Clinical pharmacologists, one bioanalytical and toxicological chemist”, all four of whom are specialists in chemical weapons analysis.
“With respect to the consistency of the observed and reported symptoms of the alleged victims with possible exposure to chlorine gas or similar, the experts were conclusive in their statements that there was no correlation between symptoms and chlorine exposure,” the document reads.
According to the leaked minutes from the toxicology meeting, the chief expert offered “the possibility of the event being a propaganda exercise” as one potential explanation for the Douma incident. The other OPCW experts agreed that the key “take-away message” from the meeting was “that the symptoms observed were inconsistent with exposure to chlorine and no other obvious candidate chemical causing the symptoms could be identified”.
Therefore, the final OPCW’s report published in March 2019 was deliberately – with malice aforethought – totally misleading when it concluded that: The investigative team found “reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon took place. This toxic chemical contained reactive chlorine. The toxic chemical was likely molecular chlorine”
Based upon all these documents, it is evident that the whole world was LIED to by the very people who were supposed to be impartial in their investigations and conclusions. In fact, and in reality, their gross dereliction of duty could have caused a serious war between the USA and Russia over Syria.
Therefore, the order by Trump to attack Syrian military assets was based on these doctored and contorted conclusions. Even then, in my talk shows with American hosts I asserted that the events described by the opponents of Assad were malicious LIES.
Again and again and again, it is the total failure and or inability of ALL the Western leaders and ALL their Intelligence Services to follow the advice of Sun Tzu almost 2500 years ago regarding the “Art of War”:
“If you know yourself and your enemy, in 100 battles you will win 100. If you do NOT know your enemy but only yourself, in 100 battles you may win 50. If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, in 100 battles you will lose 100”
It is obvious that ALL Western leaders are between the second and third stages of ignorance.
1400 years ago Muhammad boasted repeatedly that War is DECEPTION; yet our leaders do NOT understand this basic and fundamental part of the “Art of War”; we shall therefore lose at least 50% of all our battles with Muslims until they overwhelm us demographically.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.