More on the so-called FDA approval on August 23, 2021, for Pfizer’s Covid jab for those over age 16, where it was declared “safe and effective” – without, as the Truth About Cancer reports on August 24, 2021, on their website …even allowing public discussion or...
The CIA Whistleblower is a John Brennan Hack – A Prop, a Plant and Stooge
Let’s get to the bombshell upfront⏤let me assure you that former CIA Director and Barack Obama miscreant, John Brennan owned and ran the hack who has been identified as the Whistleblower inside the White House.
As the NYT’s stated, although not totally accurate, the White House-Ukraine whistleblower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election and that the White House sought to cover it up, note a TOTALLY FALSE STATEMENT, is a CIA officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one point, this is according to those familiar with his identity. Let’s be clear of the following: Officers, agents, and analysts from the military, the intelligence, and law enforcement communities routinely work aka detailed to the White House. These individuals are assigned and serve on the National Security Council, the Situation Room, or the White House Communication Agency managing secure communications between the President, the national security community, and foreign leaders.
The individual has since returned to the CIA, yet, little else is known about him. His complaint made public Thursday suggested he is a male, was an analyst by training and made clear he was well experienced in the details of U.S. foreign policy toward Europe, and demonstrated a sophisticated understanding of Ukrainian politics, and perhaps, at least some knowledge of the law and or international law.
The whistleblower’s expertise was as I will point out, a key factor in order to add to U.S. House and Senate, and the staffers’ credibility and confidence about the merits of his complaint, and that it would be critical to tamp down any allegations that he might have misunderstood what he learned about President Trump.
The whistleblower did not listen directly to the July 25th call between President Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Nor did he have ANY of that information firsthand, it was second and thirdhand information that he was relying on.
This is at the center of the political firestorm over the President’s mixing of diplomacy with personal political gain. Despite what the mainstream media keeps trying to imply, the phone call had nothing to do with intelligence information, operations or activities. FACT: Presidential phone calls are DIPLOMATIC, period! And they are covered and protected by Executive Privilege to in fact protect our foreign allies, friends and even our enemies⏤who this particular President has no problem speaking to. Because of that, ALL diplomatic communications, foreign policy, and national security policy documents are prepared and stored on highly secured computers in the White House, as is all communications and information that deals with and pertains to the President. They are run by the White House Communications Agency (WHCA), a military organization. Despite what the whistleblower, the Democrats, and the mainstream media says and try to make of it, nothing is being covered-up. It is on classified computers for the purpose of being protected for the safety and security of the Executive Office of the President, and the institution called America.
Lawyers for the whistleblower continue to refuse, and to confirm that the he worked for the CIA. Many, particularly on the political-left and those who are deliberately protecting Joe Biden, although not surprising, are in fact, bending over backwards to protect his name. In fact, most if not all are saying that by publishing information about the whistleblower was dangerous. This is a totally new paradigm, particularly from the press, who are always ready, willing, and able to do so to embarrass and or endanger government officials and capabilities. Except of course in this case because it involves “protecting” Democrats. Funny how that works.
The whistleblower’s lead counsel, lawyer Andrew Bakaj, a Democrat noted that, “Any decision to report any perceived identifying information of the whistleblower is deeply concerning and reckless, further noting⏤as it can place the individual in harm’s way,” his lead counsel. “The whistleblower has a right to anonymity.”
Despite, the effort by some to identify the whistleblower, the CIA on Thursday referred questions to the Intelligence Community inspector general’s office. As expected, a spokeswoman for the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, said that protecting the whistleblower was his office’s highest priority. Saying, “We must protect those who demonstrate the courage to report alleged wrongdoing, whether on the battlefield or in the workplace.” Mr. Maguire said at a hearing on Thursday with the House Intelligence Committee, when asked repeatedly and incessantly by House Committee members he did not know the whistleblower’s identity.
What I do know and can reveal about the CIA officer assigned to the NSC staff is that he did not work on the communications staff at the White House which handles official calls with foreign leaders. Accordingly, as noted in complaint, he learned about the President’s conduct “in the course of official interagency business,” and of course through hearsay, as was also noted. According to the whistleblower’s 9-page complaint report, which was dotted with over a dozen footnotes pertaining to open-source (unclassified) media machinations relating to the Ukraine and reinforced with public media comments by senior Ukrainian officials.
As far as where and what agency the whistleblower was detailed from within the intelligence community really doesn’t matter. From a strategic stand-point, it actually doesn’t matter whether the “CIA” officer detailed to the White House was originally assigned to the NSC, DIA, or from wherever.
The whistleblower was in fact both selected and used for a specific purpose in order for him to be perceived and viewed as creditable source of information that could fit the bill and serve the “role” of a legitimate whistleblower.
This was critically necessary in order for those working behind this effort, i.e.; do not doubt the Deep State, to be able to put forth a person/individual who was deemed creditable at all levels, and across the national security community to again, be able formally file the “Whistleblower Complaint” with the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
This brings me to a number of significant and major concerns. The first major concern that I have is that as it pertains to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff. Mr. Schiff, my sources tell me has had a copy of the actual whistleblower complaint in his possession since at least mid-August 2019. Remember, the complaint is dated August 12th 2019. In fact, Chairman Schiff many times, over a number of months during the past year, has made numerous references to the Ukraine and a number of aspects as they relate are similar to what was stated in the whistleblower’s complaint. I find that interesting.
It is almost as if, this complaint, the 9-page highly classified document (which is another concern), and heavily footnoted, was drafted and prepared well before the phone call ever to place between the two presidents’. That said, thus it was only matter of time that they, those who orchestrated the creation of the whistleblower document, just needed to wait for the eventual Trump Presidential phone call to the new Ukraine President Zelensky.
As far as the identification and wherewithal of the whistleblower, from my sources, his identity is known⏤and I can say this, he is one of the former Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s hacks, planted inside the White House, to report back to Brennan, Schiff, and others involved in the effort to take down President Trump. He was in fact Brennan’s prop and stooge, just take a look at his tweets below.
Whistleblower deserves our praise & gratitude.
Donald Trump getting very sloppy & careless in corrupt practices & cover up attempts.
Democrats & Republicans (those who have a conscience) need to work together to prevent desperate moves by Trump that could wreak further havoc.
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) September 26, 2019
Impeachment hearings are essential to determine whether Donald Trump, as alleged, engaged in extortion of a foreign government for personal political gain. If the allegations are true, Trump should be impeached, convicted by the Senate, & charged with a federal crime.
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) September 24, 2019
The actual complaint against President Trump’s phone call was not prepared by the whistleblower at all, but prepared by those working against the President. So where does that leave us?
Let’s address and breakdown the rationale and the actual justification for the whistleblower complaint. As it pertains to Representative Schiff, it appears he has knowledge and access early on. I personally believe, and this is my analysis; the strategic imperative is that this was another opportunity, dreamed up by senior Democrat officials and their operatives, just like the we saw with the dirty dossier created to support the false justification to apply for and obtain FISA warrants to use the capabilities of the NSA to spy on candidate Donald Trump in order to indict him for fake crimes in order to destroy both his candidacy and later Presidency. Now it is purely piling on to justify the Democrat’s insane and maniacal mindset obsessed with Impeachment!
In an effort to support their strategy, the purpose was at a minimum two-fold;
– Get a complaint filed and subsequently get it to the various Congressional (House and Senate) Committees, in order that they will conduct, again, as we witnessed during the Russia Collusion, as well as the Mueller Special Counsel investigation. This of course would be used to further justify a Presidential Impeachment.
– At the same time, get the complaint out to the mainstream media in order to try President Trump in the court of public opinion⏤in order to justify a Presidential Impeachment.
For those of you who have read, or for those who have not read the whistleblower complaint there are two key takeaways. As a retired career senior intelligence officer, to me, it’s glaring. This “complaint” was not written by someone who only heard about the President’s phone call by hearsay, or from a second, or third hand conversation. While they initially ‘may’ have heard it that way, so they say and claim⏤it is glaringly obvious, to sole role of the so-called “whistleblower was merely to serve as provided for the backdrop:
1. The whistleblower was the “prop,” who had zero knowledge of the phone call. He was never suppose to either. While he as an analyst, he was knowledgeable of the Ukraine and East Europe, according to what I was told, that was his cover again, he needed legitimacy as the so-called whistleblower. His complaint, i.e.; report to the ICIG was orchestrated and prepared by more senior experts and lawyers who had a background and intelligence and national experience. The 9-page document is actually an indictment, it’s deliberate, based on extensive research addressing prior circumstances leading up to the July 25 phone call. Most of it is pure lies and made up sources within the White House who were reference to be a corroborators⏤it’s pure bullshit.
2. The highly classified level of the whistleblower complaint, above Top Secret (above that of the original classification of the President’s phone call, i.e. SECRET-NOFORN-ORCON). This indicates that the whistleblower’s complaint when drafted and finalized, involved extensive research from experts within the intelligence community utilizing highly classified material to prepare the document. When you read the 9-page report, it is glaringly so obvious they have been working on this for some time.
It was more than happenstance that the whistleblower filed the complaint because of the President’s phone call with the Ukraine President. The complaint was likely in the works and perhaps written prior to the time of the phone.
Understand, it’s likely, the presidential phone call was used as the backdrop and an excuse, not the catalyst to drop the complaint for the purpose of providing further impetus, again to support the Democrat’s ongoing sole mission of their impeachment effort. With connections within the intelligence and national security community, the whistleblower and his/her lawyers would have inside knowledge when the forthcoming phone call was to occur. In fact, the whistleblower need not even had to have any knowledge albeit hearsay, second hand, or third hand knowledge of the call itself, just the date the call occurred. With that, the “whistleblower complaint” was essentially handed to him to file with the ICIG on August 12th. Hence, giving him justification for moving complaint forward to make it look like and provide believable justification. Providing for his third role as John Brennan’s STOOGE.
Let me make one other point that needs to be mentioned about Mr. Brennan. This ordeal that I guarantee he orchestrated and was involved, much more than has been addressed as of today. This effort, along with everything else he has been fingered in both as it pertains to intelligence efforts as CIA Director and his role in attempting to take down President Trump, makes Mr. Brennan the single most destructive person in history to the CIA as an organization, its operations, its performance, its integrity and trust, and its reputation and public image.
John Brennan is a gutless coward whose day is coming, and I’m sure the revelation of his involvement with this will add to his indictment, trial, and sentencing.
Finally, one caveat that I’d like to point out is to distinguish the difference between “Spy” and “Leaker” – we know the difference. I don’t consider the whistleblower to be a “spy” as he did not provide any information that we know to a foreign government, adversary or enemy of the U.S. He is however, a “leaker!” While he did not have first-hand knowledge, quite likely not even second hand information, as I noted. The fact that he participated in a scheme to go after a President who first, is above the intelligence community and second, who is protected by Executive Privilege in carrying out his role as the nation’s senior diplomat. There are in fact laws that govern and protect Presidential phone calls. Specifically those laws and directives protect and prohibit intelligence collection, access, and sharing information pertaining to such calls outside of authorized of diplomatic and policy channels.
The President’s phone call was diplomatic in nature and not an intelligence activity, period. The fact that the whistleblower is a leaker, along with those that orchestrated this as well as supported and used him, was just outright despicable, and as low as a person can get. They’re scum!
Certainly, there is still a leaking problem in the White House and across our government. That’s a trust and integrity problem the result of the further breakdown of parenting, our school system, and just bad people. Anyone who leaks classified information dealing with national security matters, regardless if it is For Official Use Only (FOUO)-to-Confidential-to-Above Top Secret information ought not to be working in the White House or any of the national security community entities. Understand, if they’re leaking something that’s supposed to be classified, then that’s criminal in nature. In fact, they can’t be trusted anywhere in or out of government, or in life.
The President and White House knew of the whistleblower and his allegations almost immediately after the call with President Zelensky. Remember what I always tell you about Donald Trump, and that is, he is always three to four steps ahead of everyone else.
This whole charade was a well-orchestrated and pre-planned effort to continue to go after this President. The question now is, by who?
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.
Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.