The Consequences of a SCOTUS Empty Chair

by | Sep 27, 2020 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The President is hoping to fill the empty seat of the late liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Conservative Judge Amy Coney Barrett, but the Democrats who will interview her are saying, “Not so fast!”  
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a liberal by nature and she devoted her life to liberal causes, particularly those relating to women. Now her seat on the Supreme Court is empty, and the choice of a new justice is up to the President, with the Advice and Consent of the U.S. Senate. The timing couldn’t be more difficult, but there is some question as to whether this will make any difference in the acceptance by the left for any appointment made by President Trump. 

This has happened before. When Justice Antonin Scalia died on February 13, 2016, his death was sudden and shocking. It also happened in an election year, but because he died in February, there were still more than eight months until the election. President Obama’s appointment to replace Justice Scalia, a conservative, was Judge Merrick Garland, who was considered a moderate, but his nomination was never allowed to proceed. There was a Democrat President and a Republican Senate, and the nomination was held back by a determined Mitch McConnell, who refused to bring it to the floor. It was only in 2017, after the election of Donald Trump to the Presidency, that Judge Neil Gorsuch was nominated to replace Justice Kennedy. There was a Republican President and a Republican Senate and his nomination hearings went relatively smoothly, ending in his confirmation.
But when Justice Anthony Kennedy retired at the end of June 2018, Trump’s nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, met with astonishing hostility by virtually every Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. The hostility turned into attacks on his character and hinged on events which they claimed had happened decades ago when he was still a teenager. In the end, the attacks proved to be baseless and Kavanaugh’s appointment was confirmed, but during the Advise and Consent process, the Democrats put him and his family through hell. At one point, the attacks were so vicious that they brought him to tears as he defended his own reputation and tried to protect his family from the lies and slander coming from the left.

Donald Trump’s most recent appointment, Amy Coney Barrett, will no doubt face similar hysterical accusations and she will have to have a strong constitution to weather that storm. 
The Republicans have promised a four day hearing, beginning on October 12, but it remains to be seen whether they will succeed in keeping the Democrats in check as they interview Judge Barrett. 

One interesting tactic that they used, several months ago when they interviewed U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, was to ask long drawn out questions that stated their case but used up almost all of the time allotted to them, giving him little or no time to respond.

They may try that tactic again with Judge Barrett, although it is more likely that they will try to dig up something else in her past that will damn her with either a crime or at least some misbehavior on her part, that will (they hope) undermine her candidacy.  
Here’s the problem:  The Democrats in the Senate are liberals, who now lean very far to the left, and they are supporting the ideas of their socialist members. They want the Supreme Court to be an activist court, one which considers the Constitution a ’living document’. That means that whatever was written at the end of the eighteenth century needs to be updated to have context in modern 21st century terms. That all sounds reasonable, unless you subscribe to the idea that the Constitution was the brilliant work of brilliant men, who dealt in timeless concepts that remain true – as much today as they did back then. Conservative Senators want the Supreme Court to maintain the intentions of the original signers – the founding fathers – and hold true to their principles insofar as it is possible to do so. They are called ‘originalists’. 
So, for example, the founding fathers could not have had any understanding of our technology or our medical advances, they couldn’t understand our speed of communication or our speed of travel. But they did understand communication between people, and they understood the basic issues relating to life and death. They also understood greed and corruption, and they understood tyranny, from which they were planning to escape. So  they created a document that protected the people who lived in America from all of the evils that they had experienced in Europe. 
What they created was called “The Great Experiment”, and it designed a new form of government. What made it unique was that the people chose their government and not the other way around, as it had been in Europe. In America, the government was answerable to the people who elected it. It was all about personal freedom linked to personal responsibility.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a liberal judge, who believed in an activist court that could change the law from the bench. Amy Coney Barrett is a conservative judge, an “originalist”, who believes that the court should judge the law based on the Constitution “as written”, who sees her role as one in which she interprets the law under Constitutional standards as it was intended by the original framers. 

The Democrats have many arguments against her appointment:  that it is too soon after Ginsburg’s death, that it is too close to the 2020 election, that this new justice should be chosen by the next president, that it is against precedent, and, worst of all, because Barrett is an observant Catholic and, as Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) once told her, “The dogma lives loudly within you”. 

All of these arguments can be countered with reasonable rebuttals, and they have been. There is certainly precedent for a speedy nomination to fill an empty chair on the Supreme Court, and a judge’s religion should have no bearing at all on his or her appointment. Judge Barrett has herself answered the issue of her religion. When Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked when it would be “proper for a judge to put their religious views above applying the law,” Barrett responded unequivocally, “Never.” She said, “It’s never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions, whether they derive from faith or anywhere else, on the law.”
Unless there is some unforeseen weapon that the Democrats bring to the hearings against Judge Barrett, she will win her appointment and add a clear and honest voice to the Supreme Court. It is the President’s hope that the hearings will be over quickly and her appointment will give the court the ninth justice that he believes they will need, following contested election results after November 3. The results are predicted to be muddy and may take weeks if not months to sort out. 
A Supreme Court with nine Justices will be a voice of authority that a split court never could be. And more than anything, we will need judicial clarity after the elections.

Ilana Freedman

Ilana Freedman is a veteran intelligence analyst with more than thirty years in the field. She was trained in Israel, where she lived and worked for sixteen years. After returning to the U.S., she served as CEO of Gerard Group International in Massachusetts, providing major corporations and government agencies with intelligence-led support for their homeland security programs. Her global network of specialists and field assets has provided her with an ongoing resource of critical, real-time intelligence and domain expertise. Today, Ilana is an independent consultant and author of hundreds of articles on terrorism and the geopolitical landscape. She has written four books on Islamic terrorism, and is currently working on a comprehensive book on China - past, present, and future.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Send Our Athletes to Beijing? Hell No!

Send Our Athletes to Beijing? Hell No!

We know that all their explanations about how safe the 2022 Winter Games are going to be⏤are pure CCP propaganda, the choice for America is clear. COVID-19 and all its variants, combined with the Nipah virus, and the hemorrhagic fever virus, are now raging through China. The Chinese government is reportedly in a panic because it has been unable to…

Edicts Gone Wild – Statehouses, City Halls, Kingdoms or Oligarchies?

Edicts Gone Wild – Statehouses, City Halls, Kingdoms or Oligarchies?

When the CDC’s data shows that children under 5 are less than 3% of the cases and have a statistically zero percent death rate, I wonder what experts Secretary Becerra has been consulting. And since these mandates reduce parental involvement, along with social, educational, and health quality, I think the Secretary has missed the boat on this one…

Americans are Experiencing the Toxic Taste of Socialism in 2022

Americans are Experiencing the Toxic Taste of Socialism in 2022

Top leaders entrusted to protect our safety and liberties have turned blind eyes to the lawlessness that advances their political agenda narratives, condoned neo-Marxist indoctrination of children, and weaponized police state intimidation of those who resist. President Ronald Reagan issued an urgent reminder that “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Studies Show Horrific Contaminations of PCR Test Swabs

Studies Show Horrific Contaminations of PCR Test Swabs

This swab appears to have a fiberglass coating. This, of course, could rip, cut, and tear flesh, causing bleeding. Broken pieces could become lodged in the nose causing infection. This additional study concludes that material and chemical abnormalities in the material at the tip of the swab are likely responsible for damage to the nasal passage, resulting in bleeding and other injuries…

Myocarditis Adverse Events in VAERS

Myocarditis Adverse Events in VAERS

We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ~80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of...

The Electric Vehicle Scam

The Electric Vehicle Scam

In order to match the 2,000 cars that a typical filling station can service in a busy 12 hours, an EV charging station would require 600, 50-watt chargers at an estimated cost of $24 million and a supply of 30 megawatts of power from the grid. That is enough to power 20,000 homes. It can take 30 minutes to 8 hours to recharge a vehicle between empty or just topping off. What are the drivers doing during that time?

False Narratives Have Been Exposed – Live and Let Live

False Narratives Have Been Exposed – Live and Let Live

We were told the virus was not treatable, and we should stay in lockdown, wear masks, and wait in sheer terror for the virus to come get us and ultimately ravage our bodies driving us into hospital isolation. Once in the hospital, we could never see our loved ones again and were sentenced to death alone in sterile isolation. As we have progressed along on the pandemic…

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough #13

COVID Q & A with Dr. Peter McCullough #13

Is the new Paxlovoid pill just a “reworked” ivermectin? What do you think of the data? Love the show. My question is, is it safe to take the provolone iodine with hypothyroid? There is a history of heart disease in my husband’s family so the thought of my boys getting any vac scares me, especially since I have 3 teenage sons. Will there be a ‘safe’ alternative? Will Novovax or Covax be safer?

Will Omicron Become Nature’s Miracle Vaccine?

Will Omicron Become Nature’s Miracle Vaccine?

After nearly two years into this pandemic, with the U.S. reporting a record high of more than 1 million new COVID-19 cases earlier this month, many are wondering when a sufficient number of the population will reach a level of “herd immunity” so that the virus can no longer find a place to reproduce. Might omicron actually be a blessing…

Why Intelligence Agencies Thrive – Because They Hold Secrets

Why Intelligence Agencies Thrive – Because They Hold Secrets

The black book(s) of Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffery Epstein’s partner in predatory sex services for influential people in and out of government, are the gifts that keep on giving, exposing the sexual predators, pedophiles, and rapists in the seats of power who command our patronage and pass our laws. Epstein and Maxwell’s purpose was to use these names to blackmail important politicians for money and influence…

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

Header

America without her Soldiers would be like God without His angels. - Claudia Pemberton

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link