The Constitution Will Win the Election for President Trump

by | Dec 14, 2020 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Over the last several days since the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) voted not to hear the lawsuit filed by Texas, many have asked me to explain first what actually happened with SCOTUS and their decision not to hear the Texas case. And secondly, what’s next, and if there is a strategy for Trump to win?
The U.S. Constitution never granted SCOTUS the authority for deciding an Election. That authority lies in the House of Representatives to be addressed on January 6. There is “no higher or final authority” than the state legislatures when it comes to elections. Again, not even the Supreme Court has the final say in this, believe it or not. That’s a fact.
I believe President Trump knew the case would get thrown out, and here is why:

1) One of Trump’s lawyers is Mark Levin’s wife. Those of us who follow internal presidential politics and those who have people on the inside know that the Levins are leading authorities on Constitutional law, as are several others on the Trump legal team.

2) Many other Constitutional attorneys and Constitutional scholars knew this before the SCOTUS lawsuit was even filed.

Why is this important? The Texas filing was weak. Their argument was feeble, so weak that both Levins and the President’s other attorneys would have told President Trump days ago that this case wasn’t going to get heard. In fact, Mark Levin did say that it would not get heard on his radio show, and he was right.
Supreme Court Justice Alito was right in his decision. He argued that Texas’s state wasn’t as serious about a resolution as they pretended to be. In fact, it would have set a horrible precedent to accept the case based on how it was written and presented.
Justice Alito stated that just as in Arizona vs. California 589 U.S., where they disputed over the distribution of the water from the Colorado River, the actions of one state could not disenfranchise the actions of another.
The point is⏤Texas cannot say they were wronged because they voted for Trump, and Pennsylvania voted for Biden, even if their election laws were illegal. One state cannot dictate another state’s actions; otherwise, we would have precedence for states’ individuality. Further, Texas was not a grieved or injured state in this election.
What would be next? California suing Nevada for having more favorable tax breaks, drawing California businesses to register there instead of California, disenfranchising the other taxpayers and programs in California that need the tax dollars?
In the legal process, the “accuser” has the greatest amount of pressure in the case. The accused is innocent by default, so all of the pressure of proving their side⏤rides on the accuser. Simultaneously, if the Judge throws the accuser’s case out with prejudice, the accuser cannot bring that complaint up again.
What I’m saying is the “greatest risk” to a case is to become the prosecutor. As a matter of fact, it’s easier to ‘defend’ yourself than it is to ‘prove’ that the person you are accusing ‘the accused’ is guilty. Whoever brings the case first runs the highest risk of losing before they even have a chance to fight. Why is this important? Because President Trump stands a better chance of winning this as a defendant than he does as an accuser.
Now comes the good part… President Trump does not need the courts to win. He only needs the “state legislatures” to do their jobs. Of course, if he gets a SCOTUS hearing, so be it⏤that’s just icing on the cake. Now, let me explain to you what’s about to happen.

SCOTUS ruled to not hear the first case. SCOTUS may or may not hear the second resubmitted case. If Texas refiles as the SCOTUS recommended. Either way, it will not change the outcome.

Note that the state legislatures will likely not be too happy about this. They may feel as if they have been disenfranchised, and either sometime this week, and more so on January 6th (when Congress counts the votes), the state legislatures will CHANGE their certifications to President Trump; i.e., those four states included in the original Texas lawsuit to the SCOTUS, and likely, even Arizona and Nevada.
Certainly, this will cause an internal legal battle within the states. But under Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution, the state legislatures have the final say on who they want to certify as the winner of their states. This will undoubtedly anger the governors of the affected states⏤who have all “illegally certified,” mind you, and the states that illegally passed state laws that strip the state legislatures of their Article 2, Section 2 of the constitutional authority. The states will say, “we have the right. We are not backing down.” I expect the State AG’s will say ‘see you in court.’
Now comes that ‘second scenario’ that I mentioned. Understand the SCOTUS is between a rock and a hard spot. The SCOTUS does not have the authority to tell the state legislatures to ignore the Constitution and follow Federal law. Remember, because the Constitution automatically overrides federal law. So, they can do one of two things:

1) Take the case, and no matter what they ruled, the state legislatures can ignore it since they have Constitutional rights.

2) The SCOTUS can do what I thought they would end-up doing, throw the case out. The SCOTUS was able to justify further throwing the lawsuit out. Again, in summary, SCOTUS rejected the Texas case because Texas filed their case as a “motion for leave to file a bill of complaint” and because However, SCOTUS “signals to Texas and the other states that if they file their cases as a “motion to file the bill of complaint,” then their cases will be heard.

As a result, you cannot say the SCOTUS was politicized since they threw out both cases. But in throwing out the case, they legitimized the state legislature’s decisions. With that, President Trump wins.
But what if they take the case after the state of Texas re-files the lawsuit? Remember when I said it’s harder to win as an accuser than a defendant? Certainly, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (for example) will have to explain why and how any Federal law can override the Constitution. He can’t.
With that, I’m betting five of those Justices will disagree with that, and they can literally cite the Constitution as precedence and final authority. Hence, President Trump wins. I believe that the SCOTUS will keep out of this for the sake of not showing partiality.
But if they DO get involved, it will be after January 6th where a Constitutional crisis will exist, and then they will need to step in and settle the matter in three possible ways.

1) Ignore the complaints. President Trump wins.

2) Take the case, invalidate the Election, give it to the state legislatures to vote. Again, President Trump wins, as we have a state majority of 30.

3) Take the case, order a nationwide audit, and recertify all the massive widespread fraud. President Trump wins.

In the end, President Trump will win. You can roll these dice as many times as you want.
The Constitution will win this election for President Trump.


Jim Waurishuk is a retired USAF Colonel, serving nearly 30-years as a career senior intelligence and political-military affairs officer and special mission intelligence officer with expertise in strategic intelligence, international strategic studies and policy, and asymmetric warfare. He served as a special mission intelligence officer assigned to multiple Joint Special Operations units and with the CIA’s Asymmetric Warfare Task Force and international and foreign advisory positions. He served as Deputy Director for Intelligence for U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) during the peak years of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Global War on Terrorism.

Waurishuk is a former White House National Security Council staffer and a former Distinguished Senior Fellow with the Atlantic Council, Washington, D.C. He served as a senior advisor to the Commander U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and served as Vice President of the Special Ops-OPSEC.

Currently, he is the Chairman of the Hillsborough County (FL) Republican Executive Committee and Party and serves on the Executive Board of the Republican Party of Florida.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and save 15%
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Having Fun
Having Fun
1 year ago

Is the author the same person who showed that melting ice in a glass of water doesn’t raise the height of the water to “prove” that melting ice will not raise oceans’ levels?

David Q
David Q
Reply to  Having Fun
1 year ago

Are you hinting that Joe “Pedophile” Biden is being displaced by this article???

1 year ago

What dope are you having? Please send me some.

Patrick Rodgers
Patrick Rodgers
1 year ago

Excellent commentary and I hope your analysis is correct. I f you are correct, while there will be initial violence, protesting and burning, hopefully the President will get tough as nails this time. Use the military to put down the insurrection and then start cleaning up the Soros Operations across the country.

Bugs Bunny
Bugs Bunny
1 year ago

Considering he’s a Colonel in the USAF, I would guess he has his finger on it better than most. However, there is another choice he doesn’t detail. One in which the military would be much more involved. Personally, I like that one best, so we can clear out some of the riff raff quicker.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Exposing Russia as a Military Fraud, Is China Next?

Exposing Russia as a Military Fraud, Is China Next?

If we had looked closely in those intervening years, we could have seen the clues of their demise. Many in my field (CE/CI) did, but the world had changed. Politicians facing the prospective loss of political control through fear-mongering of something ⏤ Russia then and China now ⏤ limited any real responses that could have achieved a safe world with Russia in it…

Take a Look at the Positive Side of Anarchy

Take a Look at the Positive Side of Anarchy

The only way to achieve liberty and peace is to restore law and order. And the only way to restore law and order is to literally crush the forces of evil. When that begins to happen, we do actually see the positive side of tyranny and anarchy. Conflict is a bedfellow of oppression. Therefore we must end the conflict and, in doing so, end the tyranny. Here’s the positive side of this war…

It’s a LONG-HAUL with COVID-19

It’s a LONG-HAUL with COVID-19

The context is that about 50% of those hospitalized with COVID-19 develop post-COVID symptoms. Severe outpatients also are affected. Characteristic symptoms include headache, hearing loss, tinnitus, loss of olfactory function, sleep disturbance, muscle aches, weakness, fatigue, and chest or abdominal pain…

Be the One.

Be the One.

Be the one — no longer willing to huddle together in the helpless band — the one who dares to join the fight. Another will follow you and then another, and in a flash of time, that bleeding hulk of our nation — once the great light of liberty to the world, now barely flickering — will rise again to throw off the wolves like it has done before, sending them scurrying for safety…

Major Medical Mystery: Why Some People Despite Exposure Don’t Get COVID

Major Medical Mystery: Why Some People Despite Exposure Don’t Get COVID

A small fraction of Americans have escaped COVID infection. CDC uses a figure of 60% for those infected, while the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington says that 76% have been infected. The remainder may have escaped exposure or been exposed but escaped infection. The latter people are the subject of the medical mystery…

Correcting America’s Course Back to the Constitutional Rule of Law

Correcting America’s Course Back to the Constitutional Rule of Law

The US Constitution must scrupulously be followed, especially by the judiciary. It is not for judges to make laws; it is for them to observe and rule on the constitutionality of issues before them. Their oaths, taken upon their confirmations, should include the understanding that their failures to follow judicial protocols would end in their termination…

Does Joe Biden Aspire to be America’s Last President?

Does Joe Biden Aspire to be America’s Last President?

Most ominously, no American administration has ever seemed so entirely unconcerned about hemorrhaging political capital. And that lack of concern about voters’ approval can only mean that this administration no longer believes it relies on political capital (the consent of the governed) for power. We can only assume that this Marxist-aligned administration intends to authorize itself with whatever power it requires to achieve its ends…

America Out Loud 6 years

Celebrating 6 incredible years fighting to restore liberty and justice to our beloved America.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.


Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!


The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link