No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Email | RSS
Did Durham avoid additional charges, knowing that the DOJ and FBI, being as corrupt as they are, would fail to prosecute? Did he realize that the actions of so many involved, including Hillary Clinton, her staff, and the senior leaders of the DOJ, FBI, and IC, the actions these people took subverted not only a national election, but represented no less than a coup against a sitting president? Did he realize that the only real recourse now is for Congress to prosecute these individuals and hold them accountable for treason?
Today’s discussion covers the following three areas:
1 – The truly subversive actions by the DOJ, FBI, and IC leaders, along with Hillary Clinton and others, in my opinion, constitutes enough evidence to try these individuals for treason.
2 – The purposeful politicization and weaponization of the DOJ, FBI, and Intelligence Community not only against a sitting president, but against America writ large.
3 – The disparate treatment, or two-tiered justice system, that allowed Hillary Clinton, her staff, and senior leaders of the DOJ, FBI, DOS, CIA, and ODNI to avoid (with one or two exceptions) any arrest. None were sent to prison. And whether or not these cases should be reopened.
As noted in the Durham report …In March 2019, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III concluded his investigation into the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, “including any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign.” … Following Special Counsel Mueller’s report, on May 13, 2019, Attorney General Barr “directed United States Attorney John Durham to conduct a preliminary review into certain matters related to the 2016 presidential election campaigns,” and that review “subsequently developed into a criminal investigation.” On February 6, 2020, the Attorney General appointed Mr. Durham “as Special Attorney to the Attorney General pursuant to 28 USC § 515.”
In this investigation, neither US law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community had any real evidence of collusion despite the often-heard statement of many of the IC leaders, including those from the DOJ and FBI.
The Durham Report Conclusion:
Based on the review of the Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence activities, we conclude that the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report. As noted, former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith committed a criminal offense by fabricating language in an email that was material to the FBI obtaining a FISA surveillance order. In other instances, FBI personnel working on that same FISA application displayed, at best, a cavalier attitude towards accuracy and completeness.
FBI personnel also repeatedly disregarded important requirements when they continued to seek renewals of that FISA surveillance while acknowledging – both then and in hindsight – that they did not genuinely believe there was probable cause to believe that the target was knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign power, or knowingly helping another person in such activities. And certain personnel disregarded significant exculpatory information that should have prompted investigative restraint and re-examination.
The National Security Hour with Edward Haugland discusses the Durham Report and the potential repercussions to our national security.
The National Security Hour on America Out Loud Talk Radio can be heard on weekdays at 7 pm ET. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. All episodes can be heard on-demand on podcast networks worldwide.
Image: Reuters / ABC
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.