By now, more and more people are, thankfully, starting to realize that nothing much adds up about our “Corona” experience, and in particular, that our interventions consistently made things worse. Don’t believe me? Africa, with 6% vaccination, was over Covid long ago,...
The Punch Was ‘Spiked’
Based on the current messaging from our ‘trusted’ public leaders, one would assume that the LANDMARK trial for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine measured and provided evidence of the two present arguments for getting this injection: first, that it decreases illness severity and second, that it prevents hospitalization. A quick review of the LANDMARK Trial has no such findings.
It fails even to attempt to measure those endpoints even as secondary or tertiary findings. In fact, the only thing measured is the prevention of COVID-19 infection and overall safety (https://www.pfizer.com/clinicalprotocol ). Where does the current messaging emanate from?
For Anthony Fauci to proclaim this, it must be from a double-blind placebo randomized controlled trial?
The answer is even the booster data fails to measure public health’s two ‘important’ truths about getting an injection or a booster (reliance was on immunogenicity data: antibodies ). Review the protocol and search for yourself. (https://www.pfizer.com/science/coronavirus/vaccine/about-our-landmark-trial).
Now to the heart of the matter, the actual heart. A new paper in the journal of American college of cardiology titled Myocardial Injury and Altered Gene Expression Associated with With SARS-CoV-2 Infection or mRNA Vaccination (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.08.005) finally evaluates head to head the genetic and pathological difference between myocardial injury from COVID-19 versus mRNA Vaccination.
A couple of things to notice in this study is the age difference between the groups and the existence of significant pre-existing coronary disease. The COVID-19-related injury hearts older and those with pre-existing coronary disease (avg age 53), while the mRNA Vax were younger and none had the pre-existing coronary disease (average 36).
Despite these differences, the outcome of the head-to-head comparison showed that:
Despite the variability in histopathologic findings, mRNA expression of candidate genes selected for protein gene product likelihood of producing myocardial dysfunction, I inflammation, or a prothrombotic state in response to Spike protein, exhibited similar changes, consisting of down-regulation in ACE2, ACE2/ACE ratio, AGTR1, and ITGA5 and up-regulation in ACE and F3 (tissue factor). COVID-19 and post–mRNA vaccine myocardial injury may have a common molecular pathology.
A typical molecular pathology is quite an understatement, but in layman’s terms, this is saying the injury to the heart from covid is also caused by that ‘safe and effective’ jab pushed by the public health establishment and big pharma. If the effectiveness part of the argument is either no longer valid or in the new messaging never measured, and now the safety part of the argument also seems suspect, how do the FDA, CDC, and local public health authorities continue to lead with these slogans?
Join us weekdays at 5 pm ET and the encore at 10 pm ET on America Out Loud Talk Radio. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. Discover all the episodes on podcast networks, i.e., Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora, Tunein, Stitcher, and iHeart. You’ll find them the day after they air on talk radio, available on podcast. Extraordinary voices for extraordinary times.
America Out Loud is the premier news network with a diverse array of talk shows that inform and inspire. A daily resource for smart people.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.