The UniParty globalists who worked so hard to suppress the truth about J6 are now having a meltdown about the release of surveillance video that proves their “insurrection” narrative to be entirely false. Vandalism at our nation’s capitol by rioters is shameful. Rioting is not political speech. Violence distracts from the otherwise valid demands of the people so engaged and cast aspersions on the far larger group of legitimate protesters.

So, there is little wonder why Trump supporters’ political opponents, whose focus has been on discrediting and suppressing dissent, leveraged the opportunity to facilitate, enable and record the rioters amid the enormous J6 gathering.

We have learned that the FBI had and failed to share critical info on the size and scope of the protest event in the days before Jan 6, 2021. We’ve learned that Capitol Police requested and were denied additional support by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, through whom such requests had to be made. We’ve also known that Ray Epps, a key instigator, a man filmed using a bullhorn to direct the crown into the Capitol building and subsequently pictured among both DNC operatives and FBI officials, has never been charged with any infraction at all.

Why does a key “insurrection” instigator whose easily-identifiable image is caught on film ⏤ enjoy seeming immunity from prosecution? We’ve not yet learned this because no one bothers to ask.

Law enforcement in our nation’s Capitol City has not yet identified the person(s) who planted pipe bombs at DNC and RNC HQ on the evening before J6, even though the person was briefly caught on camera by at least one of the thousands of surveillance cameras in the area. We don’t yet know how many of the J6 prisoners still rotting in custody without the benefit of having their cases adjudicated are among those who actually vandalized the Capitol, instigated, or engaged in any violence.

The combination of what we have learned and what remains concealed leads, reasonably, to the suspicion that the incoming administration, the bureaucracy, and those in the globalist-aligned UniParty intended to benefit from any unlawful behavior or violence that broke out and took steps to be sure it did. What is certain is that no insurrection attempt was made on Jan 6, 2021. The security video recently released by House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy and publicly aired by Tucker Carlson shreds that narrative.

While a large group enters the capitol building, they are shown walking past Capitol Police, who respond to them with all the alarm of a rent-a-cop overseeing a scheduled tour. Walking through Statuary Hall, the crowd compliantly observes boundaries set forth by velvet ropes. We are not witnessing “mob behavior” in this video. Nor are we seeing any effort by Capitol Police to direct the group out. What we are seeing is evidence that directly contradicts the narrative.

Officer Brian Sicknick, reported to have fallen victim to a bludgeoning death at the hands of this crowd (of velvet-rope observers), is proven not to have been killed on Jan 6 as he is shown alive and well in footage taken after his reported murder.   

Other officers reported to have been killed that day were subsequently found to have committed suicide. No one explains the improbable occurrence of several officers involved in the same incident committing suicide. No media outlets are asking serious questions. Are these “suicides” at all similar to the suicides of so many Clinton associates? Just asking!

I can almost hear the gasps from those who’ll accuse me of politicizing these tragic deaths with another conspiracy theory. But when the credentialed press corps refuses to demand answers to obvious questions, when the narrative offered by the administration is proven to be comprised of lies, conspiracy theories are inevitable.

Elon Musk recently pointed out that we’re running out of conspiracy theories because all of the ones proliferating in the wake of the botched 2020 election have been proven true. He’s right.   

“But wait,” say some whose news is supplied by the likes of CNN. “Didn’t the J6 protestors seek to overturn the results of the 2020 election? Doesn’t that mean it was an attempted insurrection?”   

No, it doesn’t. The J6 protesters demanded the invocation of Constitutional provisions for withholding Congressional approval of electors thought to be improperly selected in the states. That specific remedy is why the protest took place on Jan 6. And although that outcome, if achieved, would have delayed certification by sending electors back to the states, this demand is the opposite of insurrection in that it seeks recourse under the Constitution. An insurrection aims to replace the government by force. It is an armed attempt to overthrow the government. No serious claim can be made that the J6 crowd, armed only with signs, flags, and slogan hats, attempted to take on and overthrow the US Government. It was an absurdity even before the release of the security video. Today it’s a well-illustrated absurdity.

On Jan 6, the Federal Congress is tasked with certifying the results achieved in the states. Is this just a ceremonial rubberstamp designed to instill unfounded confidence? No, it is a meaningful affirmation that the states’ results were lawfully achieved and accurately presented.

Outstanding questions about the lawfulness of states’ process should not be swept under the rug but addressed and remanded BACK to the states if not resolved by the time Congress is asked to certify the result. People who demand a Constitutionally-provisioned process be honored ⏤ are patriots whose faith in our Constitution is demonstrated by their recourse to its provisions even when demanded by protest. That is the opposite of an insurrection.

With the record of J6 now corrected in spectacularly vivid fashion, it’s our move. We cannot continue on a course that ignores the legitimate demands – still relevant – made by the J6 protest. We still require that presidential electors selected via unlawful process be rejected and replaced by legitimately-selected electors. This is a reasonable and patriotic demand.

Will we the people, be forceful and persistent in demanding that course correction now follow?

Image: AP