Bishop Fulton Sheen tweeted, “As Religion fades, so will freedom.” His observation that religious conviction and the moral conduct it promotes is both integral and essential to free society echoes that of founder/framer John Adams who observed in 1798, “Our...
The Scientific Method Clashes With PostModernism
The Scientific Method is one of the greatest inventions of humankind. It is responsible for the development of modern science underpinning technological advances that have taken our world from one dominated by superstition, violence, and deprivation to one which welcomes open debate, peace, and a world of plenty. Rational Wiki puts it well:
“At the core of modern scientific practice method is the idea that the value of a hypothesis, theory, or concept is best determined by its ability to make falsifiable predictions that one can test against empirical reality.”
But the Scientific Method is now at risk of being completely derailed by postmodern thinkers who reject the fundamentals of the Enlightenment. Instead of comparing their theories of how the world works with real observational evidence, and then changing their theories to match the data, they change the data to match their theories. This is not the evidence-based decision-making governments boast about following. It is decision-based evidence-making, a wholly dishonest approach.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the field of climate change. In our program this week, we discuss this problem with climate, energy, and policy expert, Virginia-based Ken Haapala. For the past twelve years, Ken has been Vice President, then President of The Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP). SEPP is a non-profit 501(c) 3 educational organization founded in 1990 by atmospheric physicist Dr. S. Fred Singer. SEPP strives to clarify the diverse problems facing the planet and, where necessary, arrive at effective, cost-conscious solutions.
“… for years, SEPP has stated that the best physical evidence, over forty years of atmospheric temperature trends, where the greenhouse effect occurs, show that the globe is not warming dangerously…Carbon dioxide will not cause dangerous warming, and the greenhouse effect is not increasing significantly. Governments are fighting an enemy they do not understand.”
Join Dr. Jay Lehr, Tom Harris, and guest Ken Haapala in this week’s episode of The Other Side of the Story to learn what observational evidence really says about climate change and how we must fight back against those who would destroy the scientific method on which our survival depends.
References relevant to this show:
- “Woke Philosophy Now Threatening Science Itself,” by Dr. Jay Lehr and Tom Harris, December 7, 2021, America Out Loud
- “Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases” by W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer, preprint, submitted to Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, December 22, 2020:
- “Before committing billions to industrial wind turbines,” by KATIE SINGER, Wall Street International magazine
- 2-minute clip from Michael Moore’s 2020 documentary film, Planet of the Humans, referenced by Dr. Lehr in the interview
- Tom MacDonald – “Fake Woke” – 24 million views so far this year
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.