The State of Freedom of Religion in America

by | Apr 3, 2022 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

What is freedom of religion? How can you tell if you actually have freedom of religion? Does freedom of religion exist because of the First Amendment, or does government determine it? A recent case before the Supreme Court asked that very question. Sadly, the court decided not to consider answering it.

Our desire to worship as we please was not only one of the driving factors in the creation of the colonies in America; it’s a foundational freedom in this country. The very first freedom listed in the very first amendment in the Bill of Rights to be ratified was your freedom of religion. Specifically:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

U.S. Constitution, Amendment I

All of our states and the federal government recognize the importance of freedom of religion. Or do they? The laws of our states and of the United States provide religious organizations tax-exempt status. Under 26 USC §501(d), religious associations or corporations are exempt from federal taxation. In the Commonwealth of Virginia, not only are religious organizations exempt from taxation, but property owned and used by the organization are also tax-exempt.

Enter the case of Trustees of the New Life in Christ Church v. City of Fredericksburg, Virginia (New Life Church v. Fredericksburg).

This case began when the New Life in Christ Church in Fredericksburg, Virginia, claimed a tax exemption for a residence occupied by Josh and Anacari Storms. …

The city of Fredericksburg (City) sought to deny the churchs tax exemption. Years of litigation ensued.

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Certiorari dissent)

This case seems simple enough at first. The New Life in Christ Church claimed a tax exemption for the residence of their youth ministers, Josh and Aracari Storms, which the city of Fredericksburg denied, leading to this case. The case was heard in Virginia Circuit Court, which found for the City of Fredericksburg. After the Virginia Supreme Court declined to review the opinion, the church appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States for redress.

The process for having a case heard by the Supreme Court involves a petition for a writ of certiorari (Latin for To be informed of”), ordering that a lower court produce records for the superior courts review. In their petition, New Life Church posed two questions. First, did the city violate the First Amendment by interpreting church doctrine? And second, did the City of Fredericksburg refuse to extend tax-exempt status to the churchs property without a compelling reason and thereby violate Virginia law?

If youve followed The Constitution Study for any length of time, you probably recognize that this cannot be a First Amendment violation, since neither Congress nor the federal government had any part in this situation. While federal courts have conveniently ignored that fact for decades, I do want to look at this in the context of the Constitution and laws of Virginia. While this may not be a violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, it very well may be a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

State Interpretation of Church Doctrine

Virginia law provides an exemption from property taxes for [r]eal property and personal property owned by churches or religious bodies * * * and exclusively occupied or used * * * for the residence of the minister of any church or religious body.” Va. Code § 58.1- 3606(A)(2). When the New Life In Christ Church claimed the property tax exemption for a residence occupied by two of its ministers, the City of Fredericksburg conducted an independent inquiry into the Presbyterian Church in Americas Book of Church Order to determine whether the ministers actually are ministers” under church doctrine. The City never challenged the sincerity of the Churchs belief that the ministers are, in fact, ministers. Instead, the City denied the exemption because it read the Book of Church Order to confer that designation only on ordained church officials with specific leadership roles.

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Petition for Certiorari)

State law provides that property owned by religious bodies for the residence of ministers are exempt from property taxes. The issue that the church wanted to court to weigh in on was, does the city have the authority to determine who is or is not a minister for a church?


So how has the City sought to justify denying the tax exemption? Primarily, the City has argued that the church is not entitled to a tax credit because it misunderstands who qualifies as minister” in its own faith tradition. …

The church tried to explain that the City misunderstood its traditions and practices.

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Certiorari dissent)

Who decides who qualifies as a minister of a church? Is it the church or the government?

In sum, the Stormses perform essential religious functions” within the Church. … Indeed, there is no dispute among the parties that they are doing religious work.”

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Petition for Certiorari)

This is a clear case of a government entity establishing the standards for ministers of a church. The City of Fredericksburg not only claimed the authority to interpret the Presbyterian Church in Americas Book of Church Order to the New Life Church, which is a member of that denomination, but to override the churchs interpretation of that book:

The City filed a motion for summary judgment. … In support, it relied on the Presbyterian Church in Americas Book of Church Order, which governs the Church, to argue that the Stormses are not ministers as understood by the Church. … It then proceeded to argue that [t]he Book of Church Order utilizes the term ministerin contexts that make it clear that the term refers to a duly ordained person with specific leadership duties.” …

In response, the Church argued that the City had misinterpreted the Book of Church Order. In particular, the Church explained that [w]hile it is true that in order to deliver sermons to the congregation a person doing so must be an ordainedminister, there is nothing in the Book of Church Order that prohibits a particular church from hiring ministers to serve as messengers and teachers of the faith.” … On the contrary, Section 12 of the Book of Church Order provides each church rather broad authority to govern its own affairs, which would include the ability to hire ministers to cater to specialized groups, such as youth.”

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Petition for Certiorari)

Isnt the city not only establishing a religious test for church ministers, but by interpreting their governing convention, establishing oversight of the church itself? Since the question of tax-exempt status is a state matter, such a test would be in violation of Article I, Section 16 of the Constitution of Virginia:

And the General Assembly shall not prescribe any religious test whatever or confer any peculiar privileges or advantages on any sect or denomination

Constitution of Virginia, Article I, Section 16

Furthermore, by determining who qualifies as a minister, the City of Fredericksburg further violated Article I, Section 16:

but all men shall be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities. … but it shall be left free to every person to select his religious instructor,

Constitution of Virginia, Article I, Section 16

Even in its opposition to the churchs appeal, the Virginia Supreme Court said:

The City conceded that the statute providing a limited exemption from taxation of real estate says to churches or religious bodies, you tell us who your leader is, and if they reside in church-owned property, [and], we will exempt that specific property from taxation.’”

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Petition for Certiorari)

However, the Circuit Court could not recognize this violation, not only of the laws and the constitution of Virginia, but the idea of freedom of religion. And since the Supreme Court of Virginia was unwilling to hear the case, we find ourselves at the Supreme Court of the United States.

Supreme Court Certiorari

I do not know why the Supreme Court decided not to grant certiorari in this case. Yes, the First Amendment claim fails based on the plain language of the document, but that has not stopped this court before. There can be any number of reasons why four of the nine justices were unwilling to hear the case. Since only Justice Gorsuch was willing to publish his opinion, we will never know the whys. In his dissent, Justice Gorsuch does give us a sense of the travesty of justice the court has delivered to the church.

I would grant the petition and summarily reverse it. The First Amendment does not permit bureaucrats or judges to subject” religious beliefs to verification.” About this, the Court has spoken plainly and consistently for many years. …

The Framers of our Constitution were acutely aware how governments in Europe had sought to control and manipulate religious practices and churches. They resolved that America would be different. In this country, we would not subscribe to the arrogant pretension” that secular officials may serve as competent Judge[s] of Religious truth.” … Instead, religious persons would enjoy the right to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of . . . faith and doctrine.”

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Certiorari dissent)

Since the City of Fredericksburg refused to abide by the laws of Virginia and deny the New Life Church the equal protection of the laws of the Commonwealth, I believe there is sufficient evidence to claim a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Sadly, just as the courts of Virginia have acted as accessories to this crime, the Supreme Court has allowed this injustice to proceed. I can only hope that Justice Gorsuchs conclusion is correct:

This case may be a small one, and one can hope that the error here is so obvious it is unlikely to be repeated anytime soon. But I would correct it. Bureaucratic efforts to subject” religious beliefs to verification” have no place in a free country.

New Life Church v. Fredericksburg (Certiorari dissent)


So, let us return to my opening question. How can you tell if you have freedom of religion? Neither the words in the Constitution of the United States nor those of Virginias were sufficient to protect the freedom of religion for the New Life in Christ Church. Does this mean we only have the rights our governments will allow? Is the only protection for our most precious freedoms a judicial system corrupted by politics and self-importance?

Those in the city of Fredericksburg, who have denied this church their rights, work for the citizens of that city. The governor who executes the laws of the Commonwealth work for the people. If they are unwilling to follow the laws created by the representatives of the people, they should be removed. If the people of the Commonwealth of Virginia are unwilling to hold their elected officials accountable, they have no one to blame except themselves. If we want freedom of religion, then We the People must defend it. Otherwise, we resign ourselves to being subjects of those we hired to protect our rights.

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Notify of
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 months ago

The problem is all of those “Christians” out there who’ve never read the books they claim to revere that apparently have no idea that Yahweh forbids “religion”, and that “Christianity” (an incorrect Catholic term) is a Jewcorrupted ideology.

The “Bible” (more properly called “the testaments” or “the covenants”) is the story of the WHITE RACE. Not the “Jew race”, the WHITE RACE. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John?

Maybe folks should stay away from the 501c state approved “churches” and start reading the testaments with a good concordance and maybe, just MAYBE, they’ll find truth.

Here’s a primer to get you all started…it’s a pivotal verse for true scriptural understanding:

Genesis 3:13 states “And the LORD God said to the woman, what is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, the serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.”

This is what Jewscribes changed in Gen 3:13:
1: replaced Yahweh’s name with LORD, which means Ba’al.
2: replaced Satan’s name with “serpent”. This should be obvious.
3: changed the word “seduced” to the word “beguiled”, from the Hebrew word “nawshaw”.
4: changed the word “lay with” to “eat”, from the Hebrew word “awkal”.

These changes modified the original text from a story of satanic deception and seduction, to a story about a talking snake and a magic apple.

HERE is what Genesis 3:13 REALLY states:

Genesis 3:13 (corrected translation): “And Yahweh Elohim said to the woman, what is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, Satan seduced me, and I did lay with him.”

Suddenly, the things “Jesus” (not his name) said in John chapter 8 seem to make a whole lot more sense…the things like “you are not of my flock” and “you are of your father THE DEVIL”. “Jesus” apparently knew that the Pharisees were the descendants of Satan himself. Something none of you apparently know, believing that the Pharisees (Jews today) are some “chosen people”, lol.

Oh, they’re (the Jews) are the “chosen people” all right. Just not “chosen” by the god you THINK they’re chosen by. But rather by their progenitor, Satan himself.

This is the real stuff you won’t hear in your government approved churches.

Last edited 3 months ago by letmepicyou

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.
America’s Brown Shirts?

America’s Brown Shirts?

Does Maxine Waters represent her version of America’s Brown Shirts? The rash of organized deranged fascists screaming in the faces of Trump supporters, Republican officials and anyone with a MAGA hat, is emblematic of Ernst Rohm’s Brown Shirts of a bygone era in a...

Drama Queens and Manufactured Outrage

Drama Queens and Manufactured Outrage

Recently as a country we’ve been subjected to an outbreak of outrage over the treatment of illegal aliens – YES ILLEGAL ALIENS – that have been detained trying to cross into the United States from Mexico, all illegally instead of through an official Port of Entry.  ...

Inciting Violence

Inciting Violence

Shortly after my last article about the children separated from parents who illegally enter our country, President Trump signed an order to re-unite the children with their parents, and that has moved along expeditiously. That however did not quell the vicious attacks...

The Derangement of Compassionate Fascists

The Derangement of Compassionate Fascists

As a conservative, I could not be more grateful or pleased for their contributions to Trump’s continued Presidency and the assurance of his re-election in 2020, then that provided by the continuing Mueller circus, the daily visual presence of Hillary Clinton and the...

No Elijah, It’s About Seeking Justice

No Elijah, It’s About Seeking Justice

During the Congressional hearings with FBI Inspector General Horowitz concerning the investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation into Hillary Clinton’s improper handling of e-mail communications during her tenure as Secretary of State, Democrat Congressman...

The Political Pendulum is Swinging Right

The Political Pendulum is Swinging Right

I watched the historic meeting between President Trump and Kim Jong Un in its entirety but the attached link is the best of all of them. Although it is most certainly a propaganda piece for the North Korean people and the commentator was lauding the greatness of demi...

Twenty-Five Years

Twenty-Five Years

Ever wonder where the vitriolic hatred displayed daily towards President Trump by the liberal left, Hollywood, the traditional news media, and from the Democrat Party comes from? The answer is really pretty simple. Certainly President Trump’s brashness and his...

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.
America Out Loud 6 years

Celebrating 6 incredible years fighting to restore liberty and justice to our beloved America.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.


Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!


The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link