No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Today, Pharma companies underwrite three-quarters of the FDA’s budget for scientific reviews (ProPublica) and fund nearly 50% of the FDA’s total annual budget through PDUFA fees. In exchange, the agency increasingly fast-tracks expensive drugs and vaccines with significant side effects and unproven health benefits. No one at FDA wins kudos for slowing down those money flows. On the contrary, according to FDA’s own employees, drug company payments bias regulators, with “an inclination toward approval.” A brief snippet from the article: Between 2000 and 2010, pharmaceutical companies paid the FDA $3.4 billion to gain rapid drug approvals.
Following on to last week’s introduction about the unholy alliance of Big Business, Big Pharma, and Big Government, The Defender has further details on the corruption of the FDA Covid gene therapy shot approval here, and also reviews how the vaccine was created, including the use of Vero monkey cells, which has the potential for cancer from the immortalized cell lines used.
One MD (personal communication) remarked on the day of the sham approval, Do they actually think that with a stroke of the pen—like a magic wand—“approval” suddenly occurs? Nothing the FDA, pharma, or otherwise says or do is a substitute for 10-12 years of research and development of a biologic. But, sadly, most of the world will believe so. But approval or not, the CDC openly admits the shot does not stop transmission or infection, only supposedly lessens symptoms – so what were they actually approving? Some type of “cure” for the problem?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in The Defender article above, then goes further down the rabbit hole of the potential for cancer generated out of the aborted fetal cells used in two of the shots here (see 14 min. mark). It isn’t just the moral issue of using aborted babies; it is now also a cancer issue as well. Having read the FDA transcripts on this, Kennedy averred that it was one of the most frightening transcripts I have ever read, because it is clear everyone in the room understands there is a risk…let’s roll the dice.
Normally, the FDA holds formal hearings to allow public and expert input before anything under their aegis is moved from EUA to full approval but, for whatever reason – you, dear reader, fill in the blank as to why – this never occurred. The FDA said it was unnecessary, as the public had the chance to comment during a December 20, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting (many weren’t even aware of this – I certainly wasn’t – and any who did comment, no doubt they would have been muzzled and dragged from the hearing, or perhaps just studiously ignored.)
The fact that this shot has killed more people in nine months than all other vaccines combined in three decades should give any thinking person pause, and even more so in that this rush job is based on six months’ worth of data from 44,047 people, where half got the jab, half placebo… except, in a slap in the face to basic high school science, in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the control group and 93% of controls opted to get the real injection.
This means we’ve had no control group since December 2020 and have nothing to compare the treatment group against. It is not for nothing that Soren Kierkegaard wrote in the mid-1880s. In the end, all corruption will come about as a consequence of the natural sciences.
More on the fake FDA approval on Aug. 23, 2021, for Pfizer’s jab for those over 16, where it was declared “safe and effective” – without, as the Truth About Cancer website writes Aug. 24, 2021, even allowing public discussion or holding a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss data. Despite the fact that the vaccinated people can still contract the virus, and despite the fact that the original safety trials aren’t scheduled to be completed until 2023.
According to the Washington Post, this vaccine approval was the fastest in FDA history, coming less than four months after Pfizer/BioNTech filed for licensing in May. The FDA has zero long-term data in hand while emerging short-term data shows the COVID-19 jab is deadly, and by the FDA’s own flawed counting system actually increasing COVID-19 cases.
This is at the same time as Pfizer is expanding its recall of the anti-smoking drug Chantix after testing found high levels of carcinogenic material in the pill. The leading prescription for smoking secession, Chantix, was prescribed to over half a million people each year and accounted for $1.1 billion in revenue for Pfizer each year. Why the disparity between the two Pfizer creations? Or is there something rotten in Kierkegaard’s Denmark of the FDA?
The goal is, per the fiasco-Marxists now running the country, to force big business to do the dirty work (recall, the dictionary definition of fascism, as originally defined by Mussolini, was the merger of the socialist state with big business (a bit more nuanced than that, of course); or as Mussolini said – taking a page from the WEF and Davos crowd, for us poor, unwashed masses here in flyover country – “Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived in their relation to the State.” Overstatement? In California, a proposed bill would make it a jailable crime to protest at vaccination sites… so yeah, that “speaking truth to power” thingy apparently is no longer applicable; rather, as with famed leftist Mario Savio’s free speech movement on the student Union steps of UC Berkeley in the 1960s, which has now morphed into the campus speech and thought police, these types have us going from Orwell’s “Oceana has always been our friend” to “We have always been at war with Oceana.” The rubes watching CNN will be none the wiser.
As if the stench wasn’t enough, until this shot’s fake approval, pushed through with the complicity of a fake president, elected by fake votes, and pushed by the fake media⏤until today the fastest approval for a vaccine ever took 5 years⏤which was for Ebola, and which kills ~50% of its victims.
By contrast, we had around just six months of safety data for the Covid shot until approval, and the survival rate is 99.997 if you are under 21, and not far below that even up to age 70. Yes, we do need to be careful for those with serious co-morbidities and the elderly… but perhaps the shot pushers should first go talk to Gov. Cuomo about that one.
In any event, Mayo Clinic just said in July this just approved Pfizer shot was only 42% effective in preventing Covid. So, as Clint Eastwood might have said, for those taking the shot… Do ya feel lucky? Well… do ya?
Actually, we do know how lucky you might be. In Israel, one report said of those hospitalized, 59% are fully vaccinated. Dr. Kobi Haviv, world-renowned for his work on Covid-19 treatments says, as both Gateway Pundit reported and Israel’s Channel 13 News, According to Dr. Haviv, the vaccinated account for 85-90% of all new hospitalizations and 95% of “severe” cases at the Herzog Medical Center in Jerusalem. …According to their health officials, the majority of Israelis have been fully vaccinated, including 85% of those who are eligible. Out of the estimated 9.3 million citizens, 5.8 million have received at least one shot, and 5.4 million are fully vaccinated. For those frantic fake fact-checkers, other stories on the Israel issue here: “Leading Israeli Health Official: VACCINATED Account for 95% of Severe and 85-90% of New Covid Hospitalizations. VACCINE Effectiveness Is ‘Really Fading” August 9, 2021, or Wall Street Journal articles, one by Dov Lieber in the Wall Street Journal, “Delta Variant Outbreak in Israel Infects Some Vaccinated Adults” June 25, 2021, or “Israel, Widely VACCINATED, Suffers Another Covid-19 Surge” August 12, 2021, which notes: Despite most of them taking the jab, the country has seen a quick spike in cases that has resulted in more daily positive test results than they had on the same day last year. On Thursday, they had 3,843 new cases. The WSJ had yet another article corroborating this June 25, 2021, by Lieber, Delta Variant Outbreak in Israel Infects Some Vaccinated Adults.
Paired with this is Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff saying on Twitter: “In Israel, vaccinated individuals had 27 times higher risk of symptomatic COVID infection compared to those with natural immunity from prior COVID disease” and pushing people out of society is “scientific nonsense … discriminatory and unethical.”
After all, asks NaturalHealth 365 if injected people can get and are getting infected – and may even be more likely to get infected than people who recovered from a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection – then why are officials and employers only requiring un-jabbed people to get routinely tested or stay out of public spaces? To keep scientific and intellectual honesty – compared to the left – NaturalHealth also notes that the study, Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections, is still to be peer-reviewed, and appears to state the vaccinated people had a 13-fold risk of infection with the delta variant.
Need further corroboration? Over a dozen other studies – including a July study found in Cell Reports Medicine and another published in May in Nature – echo the Israeli study findings: that natural immunity is equally if not more protective against COVID-19 than the jabs.
Likewise, the Defender tells us Aug. 30. 2021 that if you got the shot, you are six to 13 times more likely to get the delta variant than those with natural immunity – this per a study published Aug. 25th, led by Tal Patalon and Sivan Gazit, with Maccabi’s research and innovation arm, KSM, which found in two analyses that people who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2 but were vaccinated in January and February were six to 13 times more likely to experience a breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to unvaccinated people who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 – and published on MedRxiv. Researchers noted increased risk was significant for asymptomatic disease as well. It’s a textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination, Charlotte Thålin, a physician and immunology researcher at Danderyd Hospital and the Karolinska Institute, told Science. To my knowledge, it’s the first time [this] has really been shown in the context of COVID-19. And the damning thing about it all is, as the Defender reports Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University who researches the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, that the Israeli study confirms laboratory findings from a series of papers in Nature and Immunity by his group, and a study by colleague Dr. Paul Bieniasz –– whose team published a preprint earlier this month showing polyclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 should be resilient to future SARS-CoV-2 variants and may confer protection against future sarbecovirus (ed. note: sarbecovirus is a strain of coronavirus that naturally infects humans, bats, and several Asian mammals) Nussenzweig said his group published data showing people who recover from a SARS-CoV-2 infection continue to develop increasing numbers and types of coronavirus-targeting antibodies for up to 12 months. By contrast, Nussenzweig said, twice-vaccinated people stop seeing increases “in the potency or breadth of the overall memory antibody compartment” a few months after their second dose.”
And why is this? The shot programs your body to make ONE type of antibody against s specific spike protein. As Dr. Mercola states, Once the spike protein, or other elements in the virus, starts to mutate, protection radically diminishes. Worse, the vaccine facilitates the actual production of the variants because it is “leaky” and provides only partial ineffective immune protection. Natural immunity is far superior, as when you recover from the infection, your body makes antibodies against all five proteins of the virus, plus memory T cells that remain even once antibody levels diminish. This gives you far better protection that will likely be lifelong, unless you have impaired immune function. Real-world data from Israel confirms this, showing those who have received the COVID jab are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than people with natural immunity.
Worse, BizpacReview notes the shot’s immunity doesn’t last. Case in point: Tennessee Titans had nine vaxxed players, and head coach Mike Vrabel has tested positive, showing it really doesn’t matter if you’re double-jabbed or not. The infection spreads among the vaxxed just the same (we also saw this on the British aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth, where 100% of the crew had the shot, yet a number still contracted delta. In an unvaccinated person, on the other hand, the virus does not encounter the same evolutionary pressure to mutate into something stronger. So, if SARS-CoV-2 does end up mutating into more lethal strains, then mass vaccination is the most likely driver. Paul Bieniasz, an investigator at the Rockefeller University, says vaccinated individuals might serve as sort of a breeding ground for the virus to acquire new mutations. This is the exact claim now being attributed to unvaccinated people by those who don’t understand.
There’s more, much more. But for the intellectually honest, this article, as well as last week’s, might well be a launch point for your further investigation.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.
Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.