What will we have learned; how long will we remember, and how far back from neo-Marxist extremism will the political pendulum swing before we lose the current American generations so fortunately inherited? Conditions must sometimes get very bad before we wake up to...
U.S. Military, the Kurds, and Syria – the Withdrawal, here’s the Reality –
THE U.S. IS NOT ABANDONING THE KURDS. The U.S. will continue to provide the best military assistance, aid, and training to the Kurds, as we have for many years.
It is a fact⏤U.S. military forces were never deployed to “directly” support the Kurds in combat operations. Ever! Since 2003, the U.S. and the Kurds have worked together against Saddam’s forces, Iranian militias, al-Qaeda, and ISIS in Iraq and Syria. During that time, U.S. forces NEVER conducted deliberate defensive operations to defend the Kurds, or their territory. The Kurds are highly capable of conducting offensive operations, and of defending themselves and their autonomous region in northern Iraq. They are actually better trained and capable in numbers, situation awareness in the region, and through their own intelligence network across a vast region of Iraq, Iraq, and Syria. In fact, they’ve actually come to our aid in difficult situations for American forces over the course of our time in Iraq and Syria.
The reality is this⏤a few hundred actual U.S. combat troops are not going have a significant impact on defending the Kurds. Period. Nor has our ‘Return On Equity’ ever addressed that either. Certainly, not with respect as an option, to remain or withdraw from the region.
Secondly, America military forces are not in Syria for the purpose of dying for the Kurds. I’m sorry, but that has NEVER BEEN THEIR MISSION, EVER! Nor does dying along side a supported ally make one a good ally, either. At the same time, it does not mean we’ve abandoned them. If that’s the case, if that is how we measure friendship, then we should be deploying U.S. forces right now, to die along side of Ukraine soldiers at the hands of the Russians. Can someone please answer that?
Further, for those of us who focus on the geo-political, strategic impact, and the consequences posed to vital U.S. security interests both in Syria and the region, there is a critical denominator…what is not realized by most is that we have reached a point of diminishing returns. It is necessary to understand fully, that those interest would be seriously further undermined by a never-ending and long enduring military presence in that country. Certainly, the continued U.S. military presence and involvement would only contribute to prolonging the Syria civil war, not change the outcome, and we would likely endure and promulgate further U.S. casualties and death with no return or direct benefit to this country or the region, let alone the Kurds, or our overall regional U.S. interests in the Middle East.
Also realize that U.S. forces remain in Turkey on the ready because of our NATO commitment, and as part of our agreement continue to provide whatever support is necessary to the Kurds. Likewise, the U.S. will continue to provide the best equipment, training, and advisory support as we have for the past 16-years to our friends the Kurds. While, the sensationalism and headlines are playing out in the media, what most fail to realize and what you are not aware of and are not seeing and hearing from the mainstream media, is what has been worked out and arranged between the U.S. by the Trump administration and the Kurds.
Over the course of the last three years of this administration this eventual withdrawal, following the defeat of ISIS and its caliphate has been discussed at length with the Kurds, the Turkish government and other U.S. allies in the region. In the final decision. The Kurds are fine with it. They have agreed to it as part of the overall process. Again, this change in U.S. policy was and has been in the works since we first went down this road, when President Trump declared his promise to destroy ISIS, during his Presidential campaign.
Today, President Trump in defending his decision — coupled it with a warning to “totally destroy and obliterate” the economy of Turkey if he’s unhappy with how Turkish government and military carry out their planned operations in Syria, particularly if they bring any harm to the Kurdish fighters.
Turkey is a NATO member country and has a responsibility to conduct itself according. The U.S. also is the largest NATO member force embedded inside Turkey, with much oversight and advisory support to the Turkish Military.
President Trump made the right decision to pull-back and withdraw our troops from the Syrian-Turkish border, inside of Syria. It is not in our national interest, nor is it prudent to continue to have a small U.S. force in the middle of the long-running dispute between Turkey and certain various Kurdish groups in Syria. That in and of itself is a long and historical debate that was never part of the equation to defeat and destroy ISIS. Likewise, with the continued long standing and ongoing civil war inside Syria, it is not America’s job to sort out the future of Syria. As I noted, we were in Syria for a very limited and specific reason – to eliminate ISIS’s territorial caliphate. The U.S. military has accomplished that goal.
With that complete, now it is time to bring our troops from that country home as President Trump promised at the end of last year. President Trump’s plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria should be commended. Don’t let the neo-cons and perpetual war mongers trick you. Note, of those screaming otherwise, most are Democrats, using the opportunity to bash Trump…they’d love your support. Go for it.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.