LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

March 29, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Are Vaccines Fueling New Covid Variants? Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some studies suggest it is as different from the original Covid strain from Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried? It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution. (WSJ)

Is this the first time in medical history the variant mutant is stronger than the original? And what about reports from China… China CDC claims there will be new COVID variants soon, which will escape all the current immunity.

Why did so many in healthcare go along with failed policies and death sentences for innocent people that could have been saved?

Marla – Hi Malcolm and Dr. McCullough, Like many nurses, I receive the Medscape emails with updates and articles. It’s so disturbing to see the narrative that is continually pushed. Seminar after seminar on how to overcome vaccine hesitancy, all sponsored by Moderna, in very fine print at the bottom of the page. So not surprising when I noticed an article with the title “5 thoughts on the Damar Hamlin collapse.” The first 4 were the obvious….have personnel and equipment available etc…but it was the 5th one that took me back. The last bullet point was, “Pre-screening athletes for cardiac issues is a bad idea.”

In what world have we entered that we no longer look for issues that might save someone?

It’s no wonder my nurse colleagues are blinded to the truth; the propaganda is constant and everywhere! It’s so difficult to convince nurses that every institution we always trusted is compromised: the CDC, FDA, medical journals, AMA, ANA, and on and on. You finally get someone’s attention, and then they go check Snopes or some other “fact” checker, and they are told what you are saying is a conspiracy theory. It all makes you sound and look like a lunatic. After all this time of fighting the narrative, do you have any suggestions on the best way to talk with friends, family, and colleagues that have completely bought into all the lies? Thank you from a grateful nurse!

Questions can be sent to any of the hosts to be answered on air. Submit your America Out Loud PULSE questions here.

Sandra – Trying to find out if the following email address in your name is real or a scam [email protected]? I have been trying to get covid meds, and they keep asking me for more money… I don’t know who to contact to find out if the above email is really from you. Help me! Please advise.

Karen – I hear there is good research on the positive effect of pomegranate juice on the cardiovascular system. Has anyone considered its possible effect to help against the clots seen in Long Haul and/or C-19 vaccine patients?

Nydia – Are there blood tests to see if one has mRNA or spike protein in one’s blood?

James – Is there a blood test that can detect the presence of mRNA? Thanks to both Dr. McCullough and Malcolm for your wonderful show!

Brigid – I listen to the Q & A sessions on Pulse weekly. My question focuses on the overall harm factor of the DNA shot (J&J) versus MRNA (Pfizer & Moderna). Most conversations on this program focus on mRNA shots and the harm they can cause. Is it accurate to say the MRNA repercussions also apply to the J&J shot? I always thought the J&J was less dangerous as it was a lower dose and one shot only, albeit a totally different formulation than MRNA options. Many people took it to fulfill work obligations in hopes of it having fewer negative side effects. So if you took just 1 dose of J&J’s DNA shot, are you more in the clear than with higher dose, muti-shot MRNA formulas in terms of long-term health issues like blood cancer? Thank you & God bless you for faithfully doing these Q&As.


Join us on weekdays at 5 pm ET on America Out Loud Talk Radio. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on AppleAndroid, or Alexa. Discover all the episodes on podcast networks, i.e., Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora, Tunein, Stitcher, and iHeart. You’ll find them the day after they air on talk radio, available on podcast. Extraordinary voices for extraordinary times.

AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK
AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK

America Out Loud is the premier news network with a diverse array of talk shows that inform and inspire. A daily resource for smart people.

  • Dr. Peter McCullough

    Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist managing the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine in Dallas, TX, USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection,” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has dozens of peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has extensively commented on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill, America Out Loud, NewsMax, One America News, Victory Channel, NTD, and FOX NEWS Channel. Dr. McCullough has testified on pandemic response multiple times in the US Senate, Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Arizona Senate, Colorado General Assembly, New Hampshire Senate, Pennsylvania Senate, and South Carolina Senate. On December 7, 2022, Dr. McCullough co-moderated a Senate Panel and concluded that all COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market for excess mortality. Dr. McCullough has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, and press releases, and has been considered among the world's top experts on COVID-19.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helen coleman
helen coleman
1 year ago

The only difference between the Covid-19 spike gene and the vaccine spike gene is the proline proline added at 986 and 987.
 
“These amino acid sites correspond to sites 986 and 987 in SARS-2-S (Figure 5), located at
the central helix (Figure 3)….. stabilize the resulting spike protein
in the prefusion state and contribute to vaccine efficiency. The mutant SARS-2-S spike
protein with these proline replacements is referred to as S-2P [85,86], which is encoded in
the mRNA vaccine from both Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273). A
new spike protein variant (HexaPro) that includes four additional amino acid replacements
by proline (F817P, A892P, A899P, and A942P) is even more stable and expressed more than the original S-2P [35].” —in the article, ‘Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in SARS-Cov-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design’, by Xuhua Xia

The vaccine is supposed to ‘trick’ the human body into making more CD4 T cells to combat Covid-19.  The vaccine is not supposed to replicate in the human cell, because the NSP (non-structural proteins) and RdRp genes are not being sent in the lipid encapsulated spikes. Covid-19 E and M genes are not supposed to be in the vaccine.   Are the  vaccines driving new mutations, because cell antigenic processing is not cleaning up unprocessed or already processed vaccine spikes genes or lipids?  Are cells attempting to process vaccine spikes, at the same time they process Covid-19 genes, driving random recombination events?   
 
For Moderna patent ‘WO2021159130 – CORONAVIRUS RNA VACCINES AND METHODS OF USE’, click on DESCRIPTION,  Table 3 shows sequence ids 6,7,8 (at the very bottom) encoding spike proteins for their vaccines. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2021159130 
“In some embodiments, a composition comprises an RNA (e.g., mRNA) that encodes an S protein that comprises a sequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or 100% identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8.”

For Pfizer, one of the spike genes for their vaccination, go to https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/es/detail.jsf?docId=WO2021213924&_fid=JP345592198 
Click on PCT Biblio Data, to verify Biontech 
Click on DOCUMENTS  toggle down until you see a 879 page ‘Priority Document’. Download the PDF, and at line 802 you will see Spike protein version 3.5 for vaccination. 

The recent preprint, ‘Inspiration of SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein mutations on pathogenicity of Omicron XBB’, Yi Wang, Hongying Ji, and others traces Covid-19 cell lethality to the presence of mutations in the Covid-19 E gene. 

“As an important virulence factor, SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein (2-E) causes cell death and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like pathological damages…..We proposed the five mutations in Class II (P71L and P71S) and (Class) III (T9I, S55F and S50G) may act as pathogenicity markers of SARS-CoV-2…..We found that T9I mutation is still conserved in these sub-variants, e.g. BA.5.2 (91.68%) and BF.7 (91.44%)….we found that XBB retained the mutation T9I and notably, gained a new mutation T11A, and the frequency reached to 90.50%…….in comparison with WT 2-E protein, T11A expression significantly alleviated cell death and caused less cytokine release. In addition, the capability of virus releasing and virulence were also weakened.”

Cell lethality was calculated through the ratio of cell death rate to the protein expression level.   Figure 1B shows rate of cell death, based on mutations in the E gene.   A11 amino acid in the E gene seemingly alleviated human cell death. 

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link