Where in the Constitution is Government Given the Authority to Regulate Property?

by | Jul 19, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The State of California believes they can order their citizens to allow people on their property against their will. They believe that businesses exist solely at their discretion. At least, that is how the government of the state had been acting for the last few years. But does the State of California, or any state for that matter, have the right to grant third-party legal access to your property? The recent case of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid asked just such a question. The answer, while encouraging, shows that the courts or just as tyrannical as the State of California. They just apply it in a different way.

As I pointed out in a previous article, what California was doing with its regulation isnt so much a takingas a deprivation of property. A California regulation grants labor organizations a right to take access” to an agricultural employers property in order to solicit support for unionization.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company both filed suit claiming that Californias law represented an uncompensated easement to enter their property, and therefore constituted a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. This was denied by both the District and Circuit Courts, leading to the appeal to the Supreme Court, which found for the growers.

WATCH THE VIDEO AND SUBSCRIBE ON RUMBLE

Takings

The growerscomplaint states a claim for an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

(1) The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides: [N]or shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Lets start with the Takings Clause. As the court quotes, the Fifth Amendment says quite clearly:

… nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

U.S. Constitution, Amendment V

This cannot be a taking under the Fifth Amendment because the property wasnt taken for public use. The law specifically granted an easement to a limited list of private organizations, specifically labor unions.

The regulation mandates that agricultural employers allow union organizers onto their property for up to three hours per day, 120 days per year.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Since the property wasnt taken, it still remains the property of the growers, and since the regulation did not designate it for public use, this is not a Fifth Amendment taking. And this nonsense that somehow the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution didnt apply to the states until the Fourteenth Amendment, is just another example of the incredibly flawed Incorporation Doctrine, which I debunked in my article The Incorporation Doctrine. While the court doesnt seem to recognize it, what we have here, in their own words, is not a taking, but a deprivation of property without due process.

A different standard applies when the government, rather than appropriating private property for itself or a third party, instead imposes regulations restricting an owners ability to use his own property.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

The court is correct; a different standard applies when governments take control of property, especially for third parties. That makes this a clear violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Not because of some invented incorporation doctrine, but because its the state depriving the growers of the enjoyment of their property, not as punishment for the growers wrongdoing, but for the advantage of an ally of the Democratic Party which controls the government of California.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; 

U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV

The court even used a previous opinion in Kaiser Aetna v. United States as evidence that denying the growers the right to exclude is to deny them a fundamental element of property rights.

The right to exclude is a fundamental element of the property right.” Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U. S. 164, 179–180. …

The Court declines to adopt the theory that the access regulation merely regulates, and does not appropriate, the growersright to exclude. The right to exclude is not an empty formality that can be modified at the governments pleasure.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

If that were all, I probably wouldnt have written an entire article, but then the court asked what, to me, is a very interesting question.

What Comes Next?

The Boards fear that treating the access regulation as a per se physical taking will endanger a host of state and federal government activities involving entry onto private property is unfounded.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

One of the concerns that Californias Agricultural Labor Relations Board brought up was the concern that finding their regulations a taking would impact other state and federal activities. The court says these concerns are unfounded. I, on the other hand, find them quite compelling

First, the Courts holding does nothing to efface the distinction between trespass and takings. The Courts precedents make clear that isolated physical invasions, not undertaken pursuant to a granted right of access, are properly assessed as individual torts rather than appropriations of a property right.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

The court is correct. There is a simple distinction between trespass and takings. I have seen nothing in this opinion that would change that.

Second, many government-authorized physical invasions will not amount to takings because they are consistent with longstanding background restrictions on property rights, including traditional common law privileges to access private property.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

Heres the rub: If the government unilaterally granting an easement, a physical invasion onto private property, is a taking under Cedar Point Nursery, why is it not under other regulations? Im sure most Americans would find it distasteful for businesses to deny access to people for reasons we dont agree with. However, part of living in a free country is allowing people to do and say things we find distasteful until they cause someone actual harm. So if the government cannot grant labor unions access to agricultural businesses, why can it grant access based on race, sex, or physical disability? Why did the same court that said the State of California could not infringe on the right to exclude against labor unions, deny to hear a case that let stand an opinion that schools could grant boys access to the girlsbathrooms and locker rooms? (I will be covering the case Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board in an upcoming article.) And what about those regulations granting government actors access to private property without a warrant? If the government demands you obtain their permission, then requires you to give up the right to exclude as part of that process; is that not a deprivation of property? If governments cannot grant access to third parties, how can they grant it to themselves? Especially when such access is a direct violation of the supreme law of the land?

The answer to these questions is quite clear. The court has assumed the authority to apply the law based solely on their own opinion and nothing else.

Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan for the Dissent

Interestingly enough, the dissent pointed out the flaw in the plaintiffs claim that Californias regulation is a taking.

Does the regulation physically appropriate the employersproperty? If so, there is no need to look further; the Government must pay the employers just compensation.”

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

I agree; the question of a taking has to do with actually taking property.

TAKING, noun The act of gaining possession; a seizing; seizure; apprehension.

Websters 1828 Dictionary

Since the California regulation did not gain possession of the property, does that mean the dissent was correct, and the court should have found for the State of California? Again, this cannot be a taking because nothing was taken. As Justice Breyer points out:

The Court holds that the provisions access to organizers” requirement amounts to a physical appropriation of property. In its view, virtually every government-authorized invasion is an appropriation.” But this regulation does not appropriate” anything; it regulates the employersright to exclude others.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

As Ive already said, and the court has noted previously, granting access to private property is a deprivation of that property. So, wherein the Constitution of California or the United States is government given the authority to regulate property?

The answer is: Nowhere.

REGULATE, verb transitive To subject to rules or restrictions;

Websters 1828 Dictionary

Since the power to regulate is the power to restrict, is it not also the power to deprive?

DEPRIVE, verb transitive To hinder from possessing or enjoying;

Websters 1828 Dictionary

Therefore, when government regulates property, placing restrictions upon your use of it, they are hindering you from possessing or enjoying it. So whenever any government regulates your property without due process, they are depriving you of it in violation of the Constitution of the United States.

due process, An established course for judicial proceedings or other governmental activities designed to safeguard the legal rights of the individual.

The Free Legal Dictionary

That means all the arguments of the court, both in favor and dissent, about the temporary or limited nature of the regulation are moot. The Constitution of the United States, the supreme law of the land, specifically prohibits governments from depriving you of your property without following due process and ensuring your rights as an individual are protected.

Once again, we have a federal court offering the right conclusion for a very wrong reason. Like the bitter medicine hidden in candy, this case is not the vindication of property rights many seem to be touting. Instead, its another nail in the coffin of the rule of law. As one more court places itself above the law they have sworn to uphold, America ceases to be a republic and moves ever closer to an oligarchy that closely resembles the tyrant we declared independence from back in 1776.

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and save 15%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.

While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.

The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.

Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.

Florida’s Gov Ron DeSantis & Lawmakers Bring 145 New Laws Into Effect July 1

Florida’s Gov Ron DeSantis & Lawmakers Bring 145 New Laws Into Effect July 1

It’s been noted that throughout the governorship of Ron DeSantis during the health crisis of COVID-19, thousands of Americans have relocated from all across the nation to reside in Florida because of the conservative God and Country values that DeSantis stands for. The Florida governor signed 269 bills in the year 2022, 11 of those measures were vetoed and 145 are new laws taking effect…

Why Roe v. Wade Will NOT Impact the Election

Why Roe v. Wade Will NOT Impact the Election

The media is trying very hard to turn the upcoming midterm elections into a referendum on abortion…A large segment of the left is once again losing its mind and proving to independent voters what independent voters were already figuring out – that the political left is led by a radicalized group of thugs who want to burn down our nation and make us live under an ultra-authoritarian communist tyranny…

American Democracy, The End of An Era

American Democracy, The End of An Era

Communism in America in 2022, at least in its early stage, is following the communist rule-book of social/political upheaval and violence. Communism is gaining control of the American government, the judicial system, and other institutions through leaps and bounds. Yet, it is achieving this through subterfuge. Let us not be deceived by…

The Elimination of Gun Owners is the Goal of Red Flag Laws

The Elimination of Gun Owners is the Goal of Red Flag Laws

Red Flag Laws are a calculated start of a slippery slope to control our young people, eliminate the 2nd amendment and disable Americans from the right to defend themselves. Every totalitarian society started by eliminating the right and/or opportunity for the populace to self-defend. So which is it? Well-intentioned ignorance? Or an insidious plot to change and control our American way of life?

Dr. Peter McCullough Testifies in Texas…”Pandemic Lessons Learned”

Dr. Peter McCullough Testifies in Texas…”Pandemic Lessons Learned”

Even a data-model expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center did not consider early treatment in models to predict hospitalization. This was a stunning revelation as modern estimates have early treatment resulting in a 95% reduction in the risk of hospitalization and death. This means any COVID-19 data model is useless unless it considers…

Biden Must Stop Sharing Our Nation’s Intelligence with the World

Biden Must Stop Sharing Our Nation’s Intelligence with the World

Damaging articles on U.S. information-sharing with Ukraine told Russia what we were sharing with Kyiv. While clearly, the administration did not want to escalate the war, sharing information that we planned to contribute over a dozen Polish fighter planes was extremely helpful to Russian strategists. It is a real mystery how this administration could have been so wrong on…

The American Communist Party Must Be Defeated

The American Communist Party Must Be Defeated

Once the world’s preeminent fighting force, our Armed Forces are now seemingly more concerned with teaching members to use the correct pronouns and promoting ‘letters of the alphabet’ to command positions than in protecting America and winning wars. Now we find ourselves under attack from outside our country, as well as from within…

Wind Energy or Blowing Smoke Up Our Arses!

Wind Energy or Blowing Smoke Up Our Arses!

Among the most significant weaknesses of the horizon blotting Chinese windmills from hell are those 120 to 200-foot-long blades and what to do with them when they wear out, break, get dented, or get a bullet hole in them? Every time a blade chops up an eagle or other large bird (what’s the avian death count now, 500,000 birds annually) gets even slightly dented, it needs to…

Recognize the Real Red Flags on the Rights of all Americans

Recognize the Real Red Flags on the Rights of all Americans

Many well-intentioned psychologists and medical doctors suggest that mental illness is a serious problem that can lead to violent acts, particularly depression. Dr. Joseph Mercola, a popular osteopathic physician calls antidepressants the elephant in the room. He rightly states that antidepressants can cause suicidal and homicidal thoughts, agitation, impulsivity, and a…

The Marxist Revolution in California Threatens Its Very Existence

The Marxist Revolution in California Threatens Its Very Existence

The state is tumbling over three critical issues. First, the human-caused climate change fraud promotes the end of life as we know it if we continue to burn fossil fuels and emit life-giving carbon dioxide, the only reason mankind can inhabit Earth. Second, the Critical Race Theory that is turning citizen against citizen as either oppressed or oppressors, and third is the covid China virus that has disrupted all normal life and…

The Warning Signs Make Monkeypox the New SARS-CoV-2

The Warning Signs Make Monkeypox the New SARS-CoV-2

In November 2021, a report was issued by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, which, along with the Munich Security Conference, held a tabletop exercise to consider responses to a fictional monkeypox outbreak that was posited to occur in May 2022. Stretching credulity, fiction has now been replaced by fact as the world experiences a genuine explosion of the monkeypox disease starting on the exact assigned date. Could this exact prediction be one more big coincidence?

America Out Loud 6 years

Celebrating 6 incredible years fighting to restore liberty and justice to our beloved America.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations. Please consider making a contribution in the fight for liberty!

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP
Healthycell

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Truth For Health

Apple Podcasts

COVID Solution Summit

Apple Podcasts

Evacuating Americans & fully-vetted Afghan's at Risk - Help Us!

Apple Podcasts

Empowering and mentoring conservative trailblazers from Generation Z to win!

Apple Podcasts

Turning Point Action is Recruiting Precinct Chairs - Become a Grassroots Warrior Today!

Apple Podcasts

URGENT - KEEP NINE
Please join us to protect the Supreme Court:
Sign the Petition!

Apple Podcasts

The LATINO USA EXIT from the Democrat Party, click for details...

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Wounded Blue
Share via
Copy link