Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our...
Which Part of Your Genetic Makeup is Jekyll, and Which is Hyde?
Israel⏤important, as it is one of the most heavily vaccinated countries globally, reported that as of August 2, 2021, 66.9% of Israelis had received at least one dose of Pfizer’s injection, and 62.2% had received it two doses. Yet, a day earlier, August 1, the director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated. See also Bloomberg archive here. Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, Alroy-Preis noted, particularly in those over the age of 60. For more info, see Dov Lieber, Delta Variant Outbreak in Israel Infects Some Vaccinated Adults, Wall Street Journal, June 25, 2021. Yet another story, as you do your due diligence trying to get to the truth, on the vaccinated driving infections starting in late summer 2021 is here).
The fraudsters at the FDA claim 95% of the Covid infections are among the unvaccinated (or as a “public service announcement” came across on YouTube today, for my state of Illinois, 99% of new Covid cases are among the vaccinated). Leaving aside the Goebbelian “big lie” of that Illinois announcement, let’s look briefly at some simple internal logic. Once you examine the figures, you will find they simply are using data from January through June 2021, when of course, most of the American public were unvaccinated. This is the kind of “science” and “reporting” that would cause an “F” were this tried at a university in the old days. The well-known Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi said this type of Bernie Madoff meets the Covid gambit. It’s all manipulated. And, if someone wants to manipulate something and is in a position to then propagate it, you have no chance of analyzing it and telling people because we have no voice in this affair. When we stand up and tell people this, they turn around and say that’s not the truth.
Interestingly, the same week the news about Israel came out, it was also announced that 40% of migrants bused in through Texas test positive for COVID-19 (of those they actually did test.) So, no worries about the delta variant if you are here illegally. And of course, the criminals in power will then put you on a plane to fly you somewhere across the country…if not on a bus (see US border has entirely collapsed as Biden regime now busing COVID-infected migrants all across the US.) They care about “the spread?” Yes, and as Monty Python would say, “the cheque’s in the mail,” too.
The world also seems to have forgotten the lesson of Dr. Barbara Starfield, MD, of the Johns Hopkins School of Health, and her famous study published in JAMA, 2000, in her well-known (at the time) article published out of Johns Hopkins, US Healthcare Third Leading Cause of Death. To save you reading time, even then, said Starfield, the US medical system was the third leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer, killing, at time of study in 2000, 225,000 people a year. This includes 12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries, 7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals, 20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals, 80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals, 106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines. The Alliance for Human Research Protection, which advances voluntary, informed consent to medical intervention, has a summary of the data here, as does the Society for Iatrogenic Awareness in its article Medical Errors: Still the Third Leading Cause of Death.
Since we apparently need to lock down the world for Covid, perhaps we should permanently lock down the world – particularly one of the significant drivers, illegal immigration – over tuberculosis? In 2019 there were an estimated 1,418,000 deaths from TB. There has to be some way for Fauci and the WHO to milk this one!
Paired with this gene therapy Covid shot (no, it is not a vaccine; it is, as the manufacturers originally stated, gene therapy) push to change our genetic makeup, as Exhibit A, here is self-appointed Einstein heir apparent Tom Knight, professor at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab. He said in 2007 that the genetic code is 3.6 billion years old. It’s time for a rewrite. And Dr. Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, in a TED talk given in 2017, elucidates this further, saying We’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution. I’m here today to tell you that we are hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about the prevention and treatment of disease. In every cell, there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will actually do. So, we think of it as an operating system … So, if you could change that … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer … Imagine if instead of giving [the patient] the protein of a virus, we gave them the instructions on how to make the protein, how the body can make its own vaccine. Does anyone recall that “Best and the Brightest” cadre that got us into Vietnam? Perhaps the rocket scientists that managed the withdrawal from Afghanistan? It looks like we have a new replacement crew for them!
Interestingly, Zak destroys his own argument by adding What’s more alarming? A stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who just broke into your ground floor and tripped the alarm? That’s what happens with an mRNA vaccine. You’ve tripped the alarm wire, and now the cell is dialing 911, it’s calling the police — at the same time that it’s making the protein, saying, ‘That’s the bad guy.’ That’s how an mRNA vaccine works.” Well, and fine… except that this 911 is causing inflammation and cytokine storms, which may well kill you.
And Knight’s synthetic biology company Ginkgo Bioworks is using its synthetic biology tech to develop COVID vaccines. Tom knows more than God; you can be assured. And of course, the unelected master of the universe Bill Gates-funded synthetic biologists believe that they can “do better” than nature with “self-assembling nanoparticles” that will be injected into your body. With all due respect to nature, synthetic biologists believe they can do better. Using computers, they are designing new, self-assembling protein nanoparticles studded with viral proteins, called antigens: these porcupine-like particles would be the guts of a vaccine.
To which I have one word. Or make that picture:
Yep, even God Himself couldn’t sink her (vaccine)!
But let me continue with a straightforward question about epistemology: How do you know something is something? One way to do this is to compare the item in question to a known quantity of something. For example, how did the Titanic above determine its longitude? Most of us know it would gauge against a known point, Greenwich.
In the US, the government has official weights by which everything else is measured for accuracy at the official government website, NIST, or National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST actually has a standard for weight in this country, which NIST itself states. The primary standard of mass for this country is United States Prototype Kilogram 20, which is a platinum-iridium cylinder kept at NIST. How do you know if you are “officially” late to that important meeting? Many of you know there are atomic clocks that NIST also has that drop time down to something a bit less, shall we say, than a hair’s breadth. The site is simply at www.time.gov (note: Canadians will know Newfoundland is a half-hour ahead of Atlantic time!) In fact, even in the world of literature, in a similar vein, Dostoyevski wrote, “if there is no God… everything is permissible” (i.e., there is no reference point).
So, here’s the question of logic: How do we know what Covid is, or whether one has it, unless we have a purified, isolated standard to weigh it against? That is, where is the platinum/iridium cylinder for Covid infections? Where is the atomic time clock? There should be a “Certified Reference Material” of isolated Covid material, which came from an asymptomatic human who is known to have infected another. Pretty basic. But one question: Where is it? Try to get your hand on one. Or try to get a biologist, you know to get one. Newstarget asks the same question here. In fact, in the Justin Trudeau hellhole that he has turned my Canada into, someone actually tried to get that, a man named Peter King, in my old home province of Alberta. When he was ticketed $1,200 for violating the Covid Public Health Act by attending a protest greater than ten people in Red Deer, Alberta, he simply asked for the isolated Covid virus (not from the now discredited and abandoned PCR test, which the CDC removed after it was outed as bogus, and which has been used up to now to falsify positives to push the fake pandemic) from Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer, Deena Hinshaw. Of course, providing this would, ipso facto, provide the rationale for why the health act had been implemented.
When, in court, before a judge, under oath, when requesting the “evidence,” the lawyer for Alberta Health was forced to admit Mr. King is requesting evidence that we cannot give, or as you see in the screengrab below, citing from the Stew Peters Show:
Citing court records that state The CMOH Has No Material Evidence, Mr. King claims this proves the Albertan government couldn’t prove the virus has ever been isolated, and therefore never had any legal grounds to impose COVID restrictions. Of course, the frantic MSM spun it by saying only in an August 7 article published by Reuters, the office of the health minister of Alberta says that the phrase, “The CMOH Has No Material Evidence,” refers to the fact that Dr. Hinshaw did not possess material evidence relevant to the matters that would be decided at the trial…. and a representative from the office of the health minister of Alberta added, It is false to claim there is any relationship between the decision on the subpoena and the lifting of public health measures.” Of course, this is the self-same government that flew a couple of lawyers cross country from Ottawa to Alberta and then couldn’t dig up the material needed? What? Were they trying to help Indiana Jones find the lost ark? How difficult could it be just to come up with a freaking sample of something we have spent trillions of dollars to defeat? Of course, having lived for a decade in Ottawa, and trained literally thousands of government workers, the fecklessness does not surprise me.
And as one doctor wrote me (personal communication) about the above: He’s partly correct: isolating the virus from a human is a first step, but proving causation is an even weightier matter.
Mike Adams of Natural News adds… Even as a lab science founder and owner myself, I have been utterly unable to locate any isolated, physical reference standards of the claimed covid-19 virus (SARS-Cov-2). All the companies selling so-called “isolated” are admitting they are no such thing, offering bizarre disclaimers such as, “this product is not suitable as a whole-cell antigen preparation because the protein content is largely contributed by the host cell and the fetal bovine serum used during virus propagation. See an example at this link from BEI Resources. A document released by the FDA at https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples of the Chinese Virus, but rather what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.
And please, do not reply with the usual red herrings about not liking the sources cited here; just answer the freaking question raised.
I am not saying people are not getting sick and dying of something. I am saying that we simply need to…. umm… follow the science and the logic. What I am saying is that, as Mr. King says, Alberta Health Services could provide no material or scientific evidence for the lockdowns based on Covid, based on the isolation of SARS Cov 2.
This would mean no masks, no lockdowns, no forced vaccines, no “nuthin.” In fact, hopefully, this might even mean a Nuremberg-style trial for Fauci and his ilk. I understand there is scientific contention right now on this issue of the existence of the Sars-Cov-2 virus. At present, I am open either way, awaiting more scientists weighing in. However, several doctors I am in communication with have indicated the virus ‘SARS-CO V-2’ has never been isolated in humans; instead, it was the genome of SARS-Cov-2 was mapped out from samples taken from Vero Monkey DNA, and therefore a true CRM (Certified Reference Material) of SARS COV-2 has never been obtained, despite requesting same from CDC.
Technocracy News, with Julie Beal as the writer, has a lengthy write-up on this genetic over-write topic in depth here, if you want a deeper dive on this. Beal warns us the coronavirus vaccines could cause serious illness for which there is no cure, and they could cause weird mutations in the natural world which we cannot control – which perhaps we are already seeing as we move from delta, to mu to nu… and possibly soon needing to use the Klingon alphabet.
Beal’s concerns include cancer and auto-immune problems – there’s a lot that could go wrong, as a result of genetic changes brought about by the lab-made sequences in the vaccines. Of course, doctors and other health professionals won’t understand and won’t be able to help because the changes cannot be undone.
The shots use vectors, and are what is used to contain the fabricated genes and get them inside your cells. The three main types are i) synthetic viruses, as used by J&J and AstraZeneca shot; ii) lipid nanoparticles, as used by Pfizer, Curevac, and Moderna for their mRNA ronavax; and, iii) bacterial plasmids supplemented with electrical stimulation (electroporation), as used by Inovio. Different vectors have different risks, as well as the other “stuff” that’s added. The newness is also a concern, because while there is a lot, we know about the viral and plasmid vectors, but very little is known about mRNA. And in terms of the additives (adjuvants), most of them haven’t been licensed before, so information on those is also limited. However, lipid nanoparticles have been used for over a decade, and they don’t have a good track record. This is why it all gets a bit complicated, but don’t let that put you off…. just picture Bill Gates’ smiling face and remember the reset cabal are relying on everyone being bamboozled.
Although adenoviruses are popular as vectors for gene delivery, lots of other viruses are used too. Some being used for ronavax include measles, rabies, and parainfluenza viruses. Early clinical trials using adenoviral vectors had to be scrapped, “because of acute inflammatory responses and toxicity”:
In fact, Beal tells us that since Edward Tatum’s initial proposal to repurpose viruses for therapeutic gene delivery in 1966 …. gene therapy has experienced a few undesired clinical outcomes due to off-target effects, cytotoxicity, viral transmissibility, impurity, and an immune response to the viral vector itself. Because it often uses repurposed viruses to deliver therapeutic genes, gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle …. owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off-target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes (ranging from illness to death of participants in clinical trials), and patchy regulations.
What could go wrong, as we race to defeat a virus that may be a little more lethal than a bad flu season? A virus is a tiny piece of genetic code, smaller than bacteria. It’s not alive, so it doesn’t reproduce; rather, it replicates inside cells. The synthetic chimpanzee adenoviruses used are designed to be ‘non-replicating.’ However, the FDA still advises the gene therapy industry to monitor adenoviruses in cell substrates during production to see if some of them are becoming replication-competent as a result of recombination between the vector genome and the cellular genome. If this is starting to evoke shades of Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel Frankenstein, you just may be howling up the right tree. Another potential problem with viral vectors, Beal worries, is that they could undergo changes that make them revert back to their original ‘virulent’ form. An example of virulence reversion was documented with the use of recombinant vaccinia–rabies glycoprotein virus vaccine prepared for wild raccoons and foxes. A 28-yr-old pregnant woman was infected with this live, recombinant rabies–vaccinia virus when it contacted her open wound.
Not worried yet? With both adenoviruses and bacterial plasmids, there is a risk of integration of vaccine DNA in the host genome. And according to the WHO, bacterial DNA can promote the production of IgG anti-DNA auto-antibodies, which is associated with the development of auto-immune diseases such as lupus. An article published in Nature said the adenovirus might cause, a significant number of cells [to] acquire genome-integrated vector fragment and that DNA plasmids could also cause the integration of vector sequences into the host-cell genome.
What makes up the human part of Frankenstein, and what part is the non-human? Which part of your genetic makeup is Jekyll, and which is Hyde? And more importantly, will Hyde turn on himself in a mad frenzy at some point?
Right now, we just don’t know.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.